| Literature DB >> 25710011 |
Christophe P M Jayle1, Géraldine Allain2, Pierre Ingrand3, Leila Laksiri4, Emilie Bonnin2, Jamil Hajj-Chahine2, Olivier Mimoz4, Pierre Corbi2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Conservative management of patients with flail chest is the treatment of choice. Rib fracture repair is technically challenging; however, with the advent of specially designed molding titanium clips, surgical management has been simplified. Surgical stabilization has been used with good outcomes. We are reporting on our institutional matched-case-control study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25710011 PMCID: PMC4331314 DOI: 10.1155/2015/624723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 13D-computed tomography bony thorax reconstruction (a) demonstrating flail chest and facilitating the surgical approach and (b) demonstrating flail chest reconstruction, with good cosmetic and functional results.
Figure 2Surgical view after flail chest reconstruction with Stracos. Only one to two ribs were treated with the molding titanium plate, while the other one was stabilized on suture plate.
Premanagement data of the 10 patients with flail chest on admission and paired matched patients.
| Medical group | Surgical group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex ratio ( | 8 80% | 8 80% | 1 |
| Age(1) | 50.5 ± 12.5 | 47.9 ± 10.6 | 0.48 |
| Number of ribs fractured(1) | 6.6 ± 2.9 | 7.7 ± 2.4 | 0.39 |
| Abdominal injury ( | 2 20% | 2 20% | 1 |
| Neurological injury ( | 5 50% | 5 50% | 1 |
| Vertebral injury(1) | 4 40% | 6 60% | 0.69 |
| Hemothorax ( | 7 70% | 8 80% | 1 |
| Pneumothorax ( | 8 80% | 8 80% | 1 |
| Pulmonary contusion | 9 90% | 8 80% | 1 |
| Arm trauma(1) | 6 60% | 6 60% | 1 |
| Limb trauma(1) | 3 30% | 2 20% | 1 |
| Glasgow score | 14.4 ± 1.6 | 14.0 ± 2.1 | 1 |
| ISS | 26.1 ± 6.2 | 28.6 ± 8.7 | 0.41 |
| RTS | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 0.12 |
| TRISS | 7.6 ± 7.1 | 11.4 ± 15.3 | 1 |
ISS: injury severity score, RTS: revised trauma score, and TRISS: trauma injury severity score.
(1)Matching criteria.
Postmanagement data in 20 patients.
| Medical group | Surgical group |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICU stay (days) | 12.3 ± 8.5 | 9.0 ± 4.3 | 0.421 | 0.076 |
| Ventilator time (hours) | 141.6 ± 224.4 | 73.5 ± 124.7 | 0.699 | 0.026∗ |
| Total hospital stay (days) | 32.3 ± 19.3 | 21.7 ± 7.8 | 0.250 | 0.024∗ |
| Pulmonary infection ( | 3 30% | 4 40% | 1 | |
| Number of Stracos | — | 3.3 ± 0.6 [ | — | |
| Diaphragmatic break | — | 3 | — |
(1)Multivariate analysis by analysis of covariance adjusted on prognosis factors (ISS, RTS, and TRISS) and taking into account the matching. ∗Significant P value.
Pulmonary function tests in the 10 patients, three months after surgery.
| Means ± SD |
| |
|---|---|---|
| FVC | 90.2 ± 13.2 | 9 |
| FEV1 | 77.6 ± 12.1 | 7 |
| TLC | 93.1 ± 7.6 | 9 |
| PEFR | 92.2 ± 2.2 | 10 |
Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), total lung capacity (TLC), and peak expiratory flow rates (PEF).