Literature DB >> 25709535

Effects of fuels, engine load and exhaust after-treatment on diesel engine SVOC emissions and development of SVOC profiles for receptor modeling.

Lei Huang1, Stanislav V Bohac2, Sergei M Chernyak1, Stuart A Batterman1.   

Abstract

Diesel exhaust emissions contain numerous semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) for which emission information is limited, especially for idling conditions, new fuels and the new after-treatment systems. This study investigates exhaust emissions of particulate matter (PM), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitro-PAHs (NPAHs), and sterane and hopane petroleum biomarkers from a heavy-duty (6.4 L) diesel engine at various loads (idle, 600 and 900 kPa BMEP), with three types of fuel (ultra-low sulfur diesel or ULSD, Swedish low aromatic diesel, and neat soybean biodiesel), and with and without a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and diesel particulate filter (DPF). Swedish diesel and biodiesel reduced emissions of PM2.5, Σ15PAHs, Σ11NPAHs, Σ5Hopanes and Σ6Steranes, and biodiesel resulted in the larger reductions. However, idling emissions increased for benzo[k]fluoranthene (Swedish diesel), 5-nitroacenaphthene (biodiesel) and PM2.5 (biodiesel), a significant result given the attention to exposures from idling vehicles and the toxicity of high-molecular-weight PAHs and NPAHs. The DOC + DPF combination reduced PM2.5 and SVOC emissions during DPF loading (>99% reduction) and DPF regeneration (83-99%). The toxicity of diesel exhaust, in terms of the estimated carcinogenic risk, was greatly reduced using Swedish diesel, biodiesel fuels and the DOC + DPF. PAH profiles showed high abundances of three and four ring compounds as well as naphthalene; NPAH profiles were dominated by nitro-naphthalenes, 1-nitropyrene and 9-nitroanthracene. Both the emission rate and the composition of diesel exhaust depended strongly on fuel type, engine load and after-treatment system. The emissions data and chemical profiles presented are relevant to the development of emission inventories and exposure and risk assessments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiesel; Diesel particulate filter (DPF); Hopanes; Nitro-PAHs (NPAHs); Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Steranes

Year:  2015        PMID: 25709535      PMCID: PMC4335681          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of exhaust emissions from Swedish environmental classified diesel fuel (MK1) and European Program on Emissions, Fuels and Engine Technologies (EPEFE) reference fuel: a chemical and biological characterization, with viewpoints on cancer risk.

Authors:  R Westerholm; A Christensen; M Törnqvist; L Ehrenberg; U Rannug; M Sjögren; J Rafter; C Soontjens; J Almén; K Grägg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Regulated and unregulated emissions from highway heavy-duty diesel engines complying with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2007 emissions standards.

Authors:  Imad A Khalek; Thomas L Bougher; Patrick M Merritt; Barbara Zielinska
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Gaseous and Particulate Emissions from Diesel Engines at Idle and under Load: Comparison of Biodiesel Blend and Ultralow Sulfur Diesel Fuels.

Authors:  Jo-Yu Chin; Stuart A Batterman; William F Northrop; Stanislav V Bohac; Dennis N Assanis
Journal:  Energy Fuels       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Size-resolved emissions of organic tracers from light- and heavy-duty vehicles measured in a California roadway tunnel.

Authors:  Harish C Phuleria; Michael D Geller; Philip M Fine; Constantinos Sioutas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Source apportionment of fine (PM1.8) and ultrafine (PM0.1) airborne particulate matter during a severe winter pollution episode.

Authors:  Michael J Kleeman; Sarah G Riddle; Michael A Robert; Chris A Jakober; Phillip M Fine; Michael D Hays; James J Schauer; Michael P Hannigan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of exhaust particulate matter of biodiesel compared to fossil diesel fuel.

Authors:  J Bünger; J Krahl; H U Franke; A Munack; E Hallier
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Impact of low- and high-oxidation diesel particulate filters on genotoxic exhaust constituents.

Authors:  Norbert V Heeb; Peter Schmid; Martin Kohler; Erika Gujer; Markus Zennegg; Daniela Wenger; Adrian Wichser; Andrea Ulrich; Urs Gfeller; Peter Honegger; Kerstin Zeyer; Lukas Emmenegger; Jean-Luc Petermann; Jan Czerwinski; Thomas Mosimann; Markus Kasper; Andreas Mayer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Characterising vehicle emissions from the burning of biodiesel made from vegetable oil.

Authors:  L Zou; S Atkinson
Journal:  Environ Technol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.247

9.  Composition and Integrity of PAHs, Nitro-PAHs, Hopanes and Steranes In Diesel Exhaust Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Stanislav V Bohac; Sergei M Chernyak; Stuart A Batterman
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air particulate matter: decadal and seasonal trends, chemical degradation, and sampling artifacts.

Authors:  Christian Schauer; Reinhard Niessner; Ulrich Pöschl
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of biodiesel on PAH, OPAH, and NPAH emissions from a direct injection diesel engine.

Authors:  Xinling Li; Ye Zheng; Chun Guan; Chun Shun Cheung; Zhen Huang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Airborne Dioxins, Furans, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Exposure to Military Personnel in Iraq.

Authors:  Mauro Masiol; Col Timothy M Mallon; Kevin M Haines; Mark J Utell; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.