| Literature DB >> 25709083 |
Bin Li1, Zimin Nie1, M Vijayakumar1, Guosheng Li1, Jun Liu1, Vincent Sprenkle1, Wei Wang1.
Abstract
Redox flow batteries are receiving wide attention for electrochemical energy storage due to their unique architecture and advantages, but progress has so far been limited by their low energy density (~25 Wh l(-1)). Here we report a high-energy density aqueous zinc-polyiodide flow battery. Using the highly soluble iodide/triiodide redox couple, a discharge energy density of 167 Wh l(-1) is demonstrated with a near-neutral 5.0 M ZnI2 electrolyte. Nuclear magnetic resonance study and density functional theory-based simulation along with flow test data indicate that the addition of an alcohol (ethanol) induces ligand formation between oxygen on the hydroxyl group and the zinc ions, which expands the stable electrolyte temperature window to from -20 to 50 °C, while ameliorating the zinc dendrite. With the high-energy density and its benign nature free from strong acids and corrosive components, zinc-polyiodide flow battery is a promising candidate for various energy storage applications.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25709083 PMCID: PMC4346617 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Zn–I RFB and its electrochemical performance.
(a) Schematic representation of the proposed ZIB system. (b) CV of 0.085 M ZnI2 on a glassy carbon electrode at the scan rate of 50 mV s−1. (c) Typical charge–discharge curves at 1.5 M ZnI2 at a current density of 20 mA cm−2. (d) The charge and discharge energy densities as a function of the concentration of I−. The inset lists concentration versus energy density of several current aqueous RFB chemistries for comparison3678.
ZIB performance as a function of ZnI2 concentration.
| ZnI2 (M) | CE (%) | VE (%) | EE (%) | OCV (V) | Avg. charge voltage (V) | Avg. discharge voltage (V) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 99.5 | 91.3 | 90.9 | 1.430 | 1.399 | 1.265 |
| 1.5 | 99.3 | 88.7 | 88.2 | 1.330 | 1.343 | 1.185 |
| 2.5 | 99.0 | 85.7 | 84.8 | 1.285 | 1.321 | 1.132 |
| 3.5 | 99.2 | 76.6 | 76.0 | 1.270 | 1.362 | 1.066 |
| 5.0 | 96.3 | 70.4 | 67.8 | 1.220 | 1.330 | 0.960 |
CE, coulombic efficiency; EE, energy efficiency; OCV, open-circuit voltage; VE, voltage efficiency.
Figure 2Cycling performances of the Zn–I flow batteries.
(a) Charge/discharge curves for the cell with 5.0 M ZnI2 and Nafion 115 as membrane operated at the current density of 5 mA cm−2. (b) Cycling performances for efficiencies of the cell with 3.5 M ZnI2 and Nafion 115 as membrane under the current density of 10 mA cm−2. (c) Cycling performances for discharge energy densities and capacities of the cell with 3.5 M ZnI2 and Nafion 115 as membrane under the current density of 10 mA cm−2. (d) Efficiencies of the cell with (2.5 M ZnI2+10 vol% EtOH) and Nafion 115 as membrane tested under the current density of 10 mA cm−2 at different temperatures.
Figure 3Raman study.
Raman spectra of catholytes at different state-of-charges (SOCs) from 0 to 100% SOC.
Figure 4NMR and DFT studies of ZnI2 catholyte.
(a) Chemical shift of 67Zn NMR for both standard Zn(NO3)2 and ZnI2 solutions at different zinc ion concentrations. The parent 2.5 M ZnI2 aqueous solution is used as reference (diso=0 p.p.m.). DFT-optimized molecular structure of the (b) triiodide-complexed zinc cation and (c) EtOH-complexed zinc cation formed in the catholyte during the charging process. (d) 67Zn NMR peaks of the pristine and fully charged ZnI2 catholytes with and without EtOH. The lines represent pristine samples and dashes represent charged catholytes (at 100% SOC).