Literature DB >> 25709034

Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations for fragment-based drug design.

Christina E Faller1, E Prabhu Raman, Alexander D MacKerell, Olgun Guvench.   

Abstract

Fragment-based drug design (FBDD) involves screening low molecular weight molecules ("fragments") that correspond to functional groups found in larger drug-like molecules to determine their binding to target proteins or nucleic acids. Based on the principle of thermodynamic additivity, two fragments that bind nonoverlapping nearby sites on the target can be combined to yield a new molecule whose binding free energy is the sum of those of the fragments. Experimental FBDD approaches, like NMR and X-ray crystallography, have proven very useful but can be expensive in terms of time, materials, and labor. Accordingly, a variety of computational FBDD approaches have been developed that provide different levels of detail and accuracy.The Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) method of computational FBDD uses all-atom explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify fragment binding. The target is "soaked" in an aqueous solution with multiple fragments having different identities. The resulting computational competition assay reveals what small molecule types are most likely to bind which regions of the target. From SILCS simulations, 3D probability maps of fragment binding called "FragMaps" can be produced. Based on the probabilities relative to bulk, SILCS FragMaps can be used to determine "Grid Free Energies (GFEs)," which provide per-atom contributions to fragment binding affinities. For essentially no additional computational overhead relative to the production of the FragMaps, GFEs can be used to compute Ligand Grid Free Energies (LGFEs) for arbitrarily complex molecules, and these LGFEs can be used to rank-order the molecules in accordance with binding affinities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25709034      PMCID: PMC4685950          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2486-8_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  60 in total

Review 1.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

2.  Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection.

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; Colin R Groom; Alexander Alex
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

4.  Quantitative conformationally sampled pharmacophore for delta opioid ligands: reevaluation of hydrophobic moieties essential for biological activity.

Authors:  Denzil Bernard; Andrew Coop; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Calculations on folding of segment B1 of streptococcal protein G.

Authors:  F B Sheinerman; C L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ranking Reversible Covalent Drugs: From Free Energy Perturbation to Fragment Docking.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Wenjuan Jiang; Payal Chatterjee; Yun Luo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  Driving Structure-Based Drug Discovery through Cosolvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

5.  Free Energies and Entropies of Binding Sites Identified by MixMD Cosolvent Simulations.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Debarati DasGupta; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Assessing hERG1 Blockade from Bayesian Machine-Learning-Optimized Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation Simulations.

Authors:  Mahdi Mousaei; Meruyert Kudaibergenova; Alexander D MacKerell; Sergei Noskov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Identification of multiple substrate binding sites in SLC4 transporters in the outward-facing conformation: insights into the transport mechanism.

Authors:  Hristina R Zhekova; Alexander Pushkin; Gülru Kayık; Liyo Kao; Rustam Azimov; Natalia Abuladze; Debra Kurtz; Mirna Damergi; Sergei Noskov; Ira Kurtz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.883

9.  Intermolecular Interactions in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosteric Sites at the Membrane Interface from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Quantum Chemical Calculations.

Authors:  Tianyi Ding; Dmitry S Karlov; Almudena Pino-Angeles; Irina G Tikhonova
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.162

10.  STACKED - Solvation Theory of Aromatic Complexes as Key for Estimating Drug Binding.

Authors:  Johannes R Loeffler; Monica L Fernández-Quintero; Michael Schauperl; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.956

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.