Nils Thoeni1, Tobias Piegeler1, Martin Brueesch1, Simon Sulser1, Thorsten Haas2, Stefan M Mueller3, Burkhardt Seifert4, Donat R Spahn1, Kurt Ruetzler5. 1. Institute of Anaesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Department of Anaesthesia, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Schutz und Rettung, Ambulance Service, Zurich, Switzerland. 4. Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Institute of Anaesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: kurt.ruetzler@usz.ch.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In the prehospital setting, advanced airway management is challenging as it is frequently affected by facial trauma, pharyngeal obstruction or limited access to the patient and/or the patient's airway. Therefore, incidence of prehospital difficult airway management is likely to be higher compared to the in-hospital setting and success rates of advanced airway management range between 80 and 99%. METHODS: 3961 patients treated by an emergency physician in Zurich, Switzerland were included in this retrospective analysis in order to determine the incidence of a difficult airway along with potential circumstantial risk factors like gender, necessity of CPR, NACA score, GCS, use and type of muscle relaxant and use of hypnotic drugs. RESULTS: 692 patients underwent advanced prehospital airway management. Seven patients were excluded due to incomplete or incongruent documentation, resulting in 685 patients included in the statistical analysis. Difficult intubation was recorded in 22 patients, representing an incidence of a difficult airway of 3.2%. Of these 22 patients, 15 patients were intubated successfully, whereas seven patients (1%) had to be ventilated with a bag valve mask during the whole procedure. CONCLUSION: In this physician-led service one out of five prehospital patients requires airway management. Incidence of advanced prehospital difficult airway management is 3.2% and eventual success rate is 99%, if performed by trained emergency physicians. A total of 1% of all prehospital intubation attempts failed and alternative airway device was necessary.
INTRODUCTION: In the prehospital setting, advanced airway management is challenging as it is frequently affected by facial trauma, pharyngeal obstruction or limited access to the patient and/or the patient's airway. Therefore, incidence of prehospital difficult airway management is likely to be higher compared to the in-hospital setting and success rates of advanced airway management range between 80 and 99%. METHODS: 3961 patients treated by an emergency physician in Zurich, Switzerland were included in this retrospective analysis in order to determine the incidence of a difficult airway along with potential circumstantial risk factors like gender, necessity of CPR, NACA score, GCS, use and type of muscle relaxant and use of hypnotic drugs. RESULTS: 692 patients underwent advanced prehospital airway management. Seven patients were excluded due to incomplete or incongruent documentation, resulting in 685 patients included in the statistical analysis. Difficult intubation was recorded in 22 patients, representing an incidence of a difficult airway of 3.2%. Of these 22 patients, 15 patients were intubated successfully, whereas seven patients (1%) had to be ventilated with a bag valve mask during the whole procedure. CONCLUSION: In this physician-led service one out of five prehospital patients requires airway management. Incidence of advanced prehospital difficult airway management is 3.2% and eventual success rate is 99%, if performed by trained emergency physicians. A total of 1% of all prehospital intubation attempts failed and alternative airway device was necessary.
Authors: Simon Sulser; Dirk Ubmann; Martin Brueesch; Georg Goliasch; Burkhardt Seifert; Donat R Spahn; Kurt Ruetzler Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Marcin Madziala; Jacek Smereka; Marek Dabrowski; Steve Leung; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Tobias Piegeler; Nils Thoeni; Alexander Kaserer; Martin Brueesch; Simon Sulser; Stefan M Mueller; Burkhardt Seifert; Donat R Spahn; Kurt Ruetzler Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Martin Christ; Katharina Isabel von Auenmueller; Scharbanu Amirie; Benjamin Michel Sasko; Michael Brand; Hans-Joachim Trappe Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2016-06-13
Authors: Alexander R Schmidt; Lea Ulrich; Burkhardt Seifert; Roland Albrecht; Donat R Spahn; Philipp Stein Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 2.953