Literature DB >> 25708794

Sex life and the Oswestry Disability Index.

Michelle Costa1, Laurence A G Marshman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Despite the option to not answer, there is widespread anecdotal belief that the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Section 8 (ODI-8/sex life) is answered inaccurately (ie, in relation to psychosocial factors, not pain) or that it repels ODI participation. Oswestry Disability Index versions have therefore been created that omit ODI-8; however, no evidence base justifies this. Interestingly, one recent study reported an ODI-8 response rate (RR) of 97%.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to measure RR to sex life questions in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to validate that ODI-8 is answered appropriately and represents a specific measure of CLBP-mediated sexual inactivity. STUDY
DESIGN: Original. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eighty-eight patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures used in this study were the ODI, the Sexual Quality of Life Scale-version 2 (SQOL-2), the Short Form-12 version 2 (mental and physical), the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-version 2, the Opioid Risk Tool, and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (work and physical).
METHOD: Chronic low back pain patients older than 18 years attending a multicultural Western spinal clinic were prospectively offered the aforementioned questionnaires. Sex life disability questions--pain dependent (ODI-8) and pain independent (SQOL-2)--appeared first and fifth in every sequence.
RESULTS: Results were obtained in 65 patients (male 29, female 36). Despite expected response attrition with battery progression (RRs for the first and eighth questionnaires were 100% and 64.61%, respectively), RRs for ODI-8 (52.31%) and SQOL-2 (52.31%) were equal and significantly lower than others (p<.001). Nonresponders to ODI-8 (60.57±13.3 years) and SQOL-2 (59.68±13.34 years) were significantly older than responders (ODI-8: 47.82±12.17 years, p<.001; SQOL-2: 48.27±12.76 years, p=.001). Among ODI-8 or SQOL-2 responders, ODI-8 and SQOL-2 were not correlated (r=-0.340, p=.104). Although ODI-8 significantly correlated with prospectively identified pain-correlated questionnaires, ODI-8 did not correlate significantly with non-pain-correlated questionnaires.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous findings, 47.69% of CLBP patients specifically ignored ODI-8; however, 100% completed the ODI remainder. Among "responders," ODI-8 was validated as having measured CLBP-mediated sexual inactivity. The ODI-8 was therefore treated consistently, as directed: It was either answered appropriately (ie, in relation to pain) or it was ignored (respecting the clause "if applicable"). No ODI modification therefore appears required for adults older than 18 years attending a multicultural Western CLBP clinic: One standard form including ODI-8 appears to yield appropriate ODI-8 response-treatment, with unaffected ODI participation. Multiple ODIs circumventing ODI-8 appear unnecessary and redundant in this population. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental; ODI; Pain; Physical; Psychosocial; Sex life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25708794     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  7 in total

1.  Risk factors for worsening sexual function after lumbar spine surgery and characteristics of non-responders to the questionnaire of sex life.

Authors:  Koji Nakajima; Hideki Nakamoto; Hiroyuki Nakarai; Kosei Nagata; So Kato; Toru Doi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Yuki Taniguchi; Naohiro Kawamura; Akiro Higashikawa; Yujiro Takeshita; Masayoshi Fukushima; Takashi Ono; Nobuhiro Hara; Seiichi Azuma; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b.

Authors:  Karlen K P Law; P L Lee; W W Kwan; K C Mak; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Development of a Modified Disability Questionnaire for Evaluating Disability Caused by Backache in India and Other Developing Countries.

Authors:  Janardhana P Aithala; Suraj Kumar; Shodhan Aithal; Shashidhar M Kotian
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  The effect of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on oswestry disability index scores: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Joshua Filer; Thomas Fleming; Stephen Morris; Neil Upadhyay; Priyan Landham; Michael Katsimihas; Ian Harding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Does the severity of pain correlate with severity of functional disability? Factors influencing 'patient reported outcome measures' in spinal patients.

Authors:  Andrew P MacCormick; Himanshu Sharma
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 6.  Association between low back pain and various everyday performances : Activities of daily living, ability to work and sexual function.

Authors:  Igor Grabovac; Thomas Ernst Dorner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Validation of the Nepali versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for Neck Pain.

Authors:  Dipak Shrestha; Rohit Shrestha; Margreth Grotle; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.