Kristen K Lee1, Lina Jandorf2, Steven H Itzkowitz1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A resect and discard strategy for diminutive (≤5 mm) colon polyps has been proposed to save costs of screening colonoscopy (SC). Prior studies on neoplasia prevalence based on polyp size have involved mostly white patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of adenomas and advanced histologic features by size among primarily black and Latino patients enrolled in a prospective SC study. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from a prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Urban academic medical center. PATIENTS: Average risk, asymptomatic, minority patients aged ≥50 years undergoing SC. INTERVENTIONS: Screening colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of neoplasia and advanced histologic features (villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer) by polyp size and location. RESULTS: A total of 566 polyps from 295 patients were analyzed. Diminutive polyps and small (6-9 mm) polyps had lower prevalence of ≥1 advanced feature compared with large (≥10 mm) polyps (0.9% and 2.7%, respectively, vs 13.6%; P < .001 for both comparisons). Distal polyps were less likely to be neoplastic (31.7% vs 61.4%; P < .001) than proximal polyps in all size categories (P < .001 for all comparisons). After adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, and location, large polyps were more likely to have ≥1 advanced feature than diminutive polyps (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 19.5; 95% CI, 4.4-85.6) or small polyps (adjusted OR 6.1; 95% CI, 2.2-16.9). LIMITATIONS: Use of pathology reports for polyp size. CONCLUSION: Among a cohort of minority patients, advanced histologic features were very rare in diminutive polyps. Distal polyps were less likely to be neoplastic than proximal polyps in all size categories. This supports a resect and discard strategy for diminutive polyps, especially in the distal colon.
BACKGROUND: A resect and discard strategy for diminutive (≤5 mm) colon polyps has been proposed to save costs of screening colonoscopy (SC). Prior studies on neoplasia prevalence based on polyp size have involved mostly white patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of adenomas and advanced histologic features by size among primarily black and Latino patients enrolled in a prospective SC study. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from a prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Urban academic medical center. PATIENTS: Average risk, asymptomatic, minority patients aged ≥50 years undergoing SC. INTERVENTIONS: Screening colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of neoplasia and advanced histologic features (villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer) by polyp size and location. RESULTS: A total of 566 polyps from 295 patients were analyzed. Diminutive polyps and small (6-9 mm) polyps had lower prevalence of ≥1 advanced feature compared with large (≥10 mm) polyps (0.9% and 2.7%, respectively, vs 13.6%; P < .001 for both comparisons). Distal polyps were less likely to be neoplastic (31.7% vs 61.4%; P < .001) than proximal polyps in all size categories (P < .001 for all comparisons). After adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, and location, large polyps were more likely to have ≥1 advanced feature than diminutive polyps (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 19.5; 95% CI, 4.4-85.6) or small polyps (adjusted OR 6.1; 95% CI, 2.2-16.9). LIMITATIONS: Use of pathology reports for polyp size. CONCLUSION: Among a cohort of minority patients, advanced histologic features were very rare in diminutive polyps. Distal polyps were less likely to be neoplastic than proximal polyps in all size categories. This supports a resect and discard strategy for diminutive polyps, especially in the distal colon.
Authors: A Fatehullah; S Sharma; I P Newton; A J Langlands; H Lay; S A Nelson; R K McMahon; N McIlvenny; P L Appleton; S Cochran; I S Näthke Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 4.379