| Literature DB >> 25708547 |
Abstract
Although Pilati et al.'s (2014) findings question the strong quantitative universality of the attribution-affect model of helping, they are consistent with a weak form of quantitative universality, as well as with the qualitative universality of the theory. However, universality is put into question by previous studies revealing significant and sizeable between-study differences in the strength of the causal paths postulated by the theory. These differences may in part reflect differences in the type of helping situations studied.Keywords: Anger; Attribution-affect model of helping; Cross-cultural research; Helping; Qualitative and quantitative universality; Responsibility; Sympathy
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25708547 DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Psychol ISSN: 0020-7594