Literature DB >> 25708503

Safe and cost-effective ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device: our experience.

Usha Verma1, Fausto E Astudillo-Dávalos2, Sabrina A Gerkowicz3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and difference in cost of ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device (IUD). STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 23 women underwent ultrasound-guided retrieval of retained IUDs between January 2013 and March 2014. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed in all cases to assess the localization of the IUD. Under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, either the crochet type IUD hook (Gyneas, Goussainville, France) or Alligator forceps were used to grasp the IUD and remove it from the uterine cavity. The costs of the ultrasound guided procedure and the hysteroscopic removal of the IUD were compared.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients who failed IUD removal in the clinic were referred to our department for ultrasound-guided removal. All patients had an IUD present in the uterine cavity. Eleven patients had Paragard IUDs (48%), eight had Mirena IUDs (35%), three had Lippes loop (13%), and one had a ring IUD (4%). The patients' ages ranged from 20-56 years. The IUDs were in place for 8 months to 23 years. Of the 23 patients with retained IUDs, 19 were successfully removed (83%), and 4 underwent hysteroscopic removal of IUD. The IUD removal cost in the operating room on average was $3562 US dollars and the cost of ultrasound-guided removal was $465 US dollars.
CONCLUSIONS: Retained intrauterine devices with or without strings can often be safely removed in an office-based setting under ultrasound guidance at less cost than in the operating room, even in cases with embedded IUDs. IMPLICATIONS: Our experience leads us to propose in-office IUD removal under ultrasound guidance as the first line in management of retained IUDs after failed removal by conventional practices. Ultrasound provides numerous advantages including direct visualization in a less invasive manner than hysteroscopy. Three-dimensional imaging can also be used for enhanced perspective.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; IUD removal; Missing strings; Retained IUD; Ultrasound guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25708503     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  2 in total

1.  Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report.

Authors:  Jordan Sarver; Melissa Cregan; Daniel Cain
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-23

2.  Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Ma Rosielyn D Asto; Maria Antonia E Habana
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2018-05-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.