Literature DB >> 25708388

A probabilistic method to report predictions from a human liver microsomes stability QSAR model: a practical tool for drug discovery.

Ignacio Aliagas1, Alberto Gobbi, Timothy Heffron, Man-Ling Lee, Daniel F Ortwine, Mark Zak, S Cyrus Khojasteh.   

Abstract

Using data from the in vitro liver microsomes metabolic stability assay, we have developed QSAR models to predict in vitro human clearance. Models were trained using in house high-throughput assay data reported as the predicted human hepatic clearance by liver microsomes or pCLh. Machine learning regression methods were used to generate the models. Model output for a given molecule was reported as its probability of being metabolically stable, thus allowing for synthesis prioritization based on this prediction. Use of probability, instead of the regression value or categories, has been found to be an efficient way for both reporting and assessing predictions. Model performance is evaluated using prospective validation. These models have been integrated into a number of desktop tools, and the models are routinely used to prioritize the synthesis of compounds. We discuss two therapeutic projects at Genentech that exemplify the benefits of a probabilistic approach in applying the models. A three-year retrospective analysis of measured liver microsomes stability data on all registered compounds at Genentech reveals that the use of these models has resulted in an improved metabolic stability profile of synthesized compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25708388     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9838-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  38 in total

1.  DEGAS: sharing and tracking target compound ideas with external collaborators.

Authors:  Man-Ling Lee; Ignacio Aliagas; Jennafer Dotson; Jianwen A Feng; Alberto Gobbi; Timothy Heffron
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Similarity to molecules in the training set is a good discriminator for prediction accuracy in QSAR.

Authors:  Robert P Sheridan; Bradley P Feuston; Vladimir N Maiorov; Simon K Kearsley
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

3.  The importance of the domain of applicability in QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Shane Weaver; M Paul Gleeson
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.518

4.  Predicting human liver microsomal stability with machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Yojiro Sakiyama; Hitomi Yuki; Takashi Moriya; Kazunari Hattori; Misaki Suzuki; Kaoru Shimada; Teruki Honma
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 5.  High throughput ADME screening: practical considerations, impact on the portfolio and enabler of in silico ADME models.

Authors:  Cornelis E C A Hop; Mark J Cole; Ralph E Davidson; David B Duignan; James Federico; John S Janiszewski; Kelly Jenkins; Suzanne Krueger; Rebecca Lebowitz; Theodore E Liston; Walter Mitchell; Mark Snyder; Stefan J Steyn; John R Soglia; Christine Taylor; Matt D Troutman; John Umland; Michael West; Kevin M Whalen; Veronica Zelesky; Sabrina X Zhao
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Development of QSAR models for microsomal stability: identification of good and bad structural features for rat, human and mouse microsomal stability.

Authors:  Yongbo Hu; Ray Unwalla; R Aldrin Denny; Jack Bikker; Li Di; Christine Humblet
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Significant species difference in amide hydrolysis of GDC-0834, a novel potent and selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Authors:  Lichuan Liu; Jason S Halladay; Young Shin; Susan Wong; Melis Coraggio; Hank La; Matthew Baumgardner; Hoa Le; Sashi Gopaul; Jason Boggs; Peter Kuebler; John C Davis; X Charlene Liao; Joseph W Lubach; Alan Deese; C Gregory Sowell; Kevin S Currie; Wendy B Young; S Cyrus Khojasteh; Cornelis E C A Hop; Harvey Wong
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Comparison of metabolic soft spot predictions of CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 substrates using MetaSite and StarDrop.

Authors:  Young G Shin; Hoa Le; Cyrus Khojasteh; Cornelis E C A Hop
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 9.  Computer systems for the prediction of xenobiotic metabolism.

Authors:  Jan Langowski; Anthony Long
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-03-31       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  The identification of 2-(1H-indazol-4-yl)-6-(4-methanesulfonyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-4-morpholin-4-yl-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (GDC-0941) as a potent, selective, orally bioavailable inhibitor of class I PI3 kinase for the treatment of cancer .

Authors:  Adrian J Folkes; Khatereh Ahmadi; Wendy K Alderton; Sonia Alix; Stewart J Baker; Gary Box; Irina S Chuckowree; Paul A Clarke; Paul Depledge; Suzanne A Eccles; Lori S Friedman; Angela Hayes; Timothy C Hancox; Arumugam Kugendradas; Letitia Lensun; Pauline Moore; Alan G Olivero; Jodie Pang; Sonal Patel; Giles H Pergl-Wilson; Florence I Raynaud; Anthony Robson; Nahid Saghir; Laurent Salphati; Sukhjit Sohal; Mark H Ultsch; Melanie Valenti; Heidi J A Wallweber; Nan Chi Wan; Christian Wiesmann; Paul Workman; Alexander Zhyvoloup; Marketa J Zvelebil; Stephen J Shuttleworth
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  3 in total

1.  An integrated suite of modeling tools that empower scientists in structure- and property-based drug design.

Authors:  Jianwen A Feng; Ignacio Aliagas; Philippe Bergeron; Jeff M Blaney; Erin K Bradley; Michael F T Koehler; Man-Ling Lee; Daniel F Ortwine; Vickie Tsui; Johnny Wu; Alberto Gobbi
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Advances in the study of drug metabolism - symposium report of the 12th Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics (ISSX).

Authors:  Laura E Russell; Mary Alexandra Schleiff; Eric Gonzalez; Aaron G Bart; Fabio Broccatelli; Jessica H Hartman; W Griffith Humphreys; Volker M Lauschke; Iain Martin; Chukwunonso Nwabufo; Bhagwat Prasad; Emily E Scott; Matthew Segall; Ryan Takahashi; Mitchell E Taub; Jasleen K Sodhi
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.518

3.  chemalot and chemalot_knime: Command line programs as workflow tools for drug discovery.

Authors:  Man-Ling Lee; Ignacio Aliagas; Jianwen A Feng; Thomas Gabriel; T J O'Donnell; Benjamin D Sellers; Bernd Wiswedel; Alberto Gobbi
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.514

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.