Literature DB >> 25708180

First trimester screening for other trisomies than trisomy 21, 18, and 13.

Niels Tørring1, Olav Bjørn Petersen2, Naja Becher3, Ida Vogel3, Niels Uldbjerg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of first trimester combined screening in cases of placental/fetal, mosaic or non-mosaic, autosomal trisomy other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13, and in cases of aneuploidy for a marker chromosome with focus on biochemical markers.
METHOD: We identified 66 cases in three large databases including 357 675 pregnancies from October 2003 to January 2014.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of the 66 cases were screened positive at the combined first trimester screening (cFTS) for trisomy 21 or trisomy 18 or 13. The multiple of median (MoM) of Pregnancy Associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) of the different aneuploidy groups ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 MoM, whereas the MoM of maternal serum free - β - human chorionic gonadotropin (FβhCG) was approximately 1.0 MoM. The exceptions being 0.2 MoM for cases involving chromosome 8 (n = 7) and 0.5 MoM for cases involving chromosome 9 (n = 3). The nuchal translucency MoM was approximately 1.0 MoM in all aneuploidy groups.
CONCLUSION: The cFTS program for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 is also sensitive to a broad range of rare chromosomal trisomies and chromosomal mosaicisms, primarily because of a strong detection capacity of PAPP-A MoM.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25708180     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  The utility of nuchal translucency ultrasound in identifying rare chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  Victoria K Berger; Mary E Norton; Teresa N Sparks; Monica Flessel; Rebecca J Baer; Robert J Currier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Partial trisomy 9: prenatal diagnosis and recurrence within same family.

Authors:  Jana López-Félix; Leticia Flores-Gallegos; Luz Garduño-Zarazúa; Teresa Leis-Márquez; Luz Juárez-García; Ricardo Meléndez-Hernández; Ernesto Castelazo-Morales; Dora Mayén-Molina
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-10

3.  Factors associated with common and atypical chromosome abnormalities after positive combined first-trimester screening in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Annisa Mak; Helena Lee; C F Poon; S L Kwok; Teresa Ma; K Y K Chan; Anita Kan; Mary Tang; K Y Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Cell-free DNA testing of an extended range of chromosomal anomalies: clinical experience with 6,388 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Graziano Pescia; Nicolas Guex; Christian Iseli; Liam Brennan; Magne Osteras; Ioannis Xenarios; Laurent Farinelli; Bernard Conrad
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Antenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Karl Oliver Kagan; Jiri Sonek; Peter Kozlowski
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.