Literature DB >> 25708034

Cementless revision for infected hip arthroplasty: an 8.6 years follow-up.

Peng Li1, Ming Hou, Zhi-Qi Zhu, Zhan-Jun Shi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cementless revision for postoperative infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: From November 1997 to December 2009, 10 patients (10 hips; four males, six females) of mean age 58 years (36-73 years) with infection after THA were treated. Six of the 10 hips underwent revision total hip arthroplasty, two only received new acetabular components and two underwent stem revision. One-stage revision was performed in six cases and two-stage revision in four. Consecutive radiographs were compared to evaluate component conditions. Harris hip scores were determined before surgery and at final follow-up. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were assessed.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up for a mean duration of 8.6 years (6.5-15.6 years). The mean Harris hip score improved from 35 (18-63) points preoperatively to 89 (60-99) points at final follow-up. No re-infection occurred. Femoral component exsertion was occurred in one asymptomatic patient. Hip joint pain resolved in seven cases; three patients had mild pain when walking long distances. At final follow-up, six patients still had slight limps. Heterotopic ossification developed in two hips. Mean polyethylene liner wear was 0.08 mm per year at final follow-up. Deep vein phlebothrombosis and nerve injury did not occur.
CONCLUSION: One- or two-stage revisions using cementless prosthesis can produce satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with infection after THA. Whether the original prosthesis can be partially retained when attached tightly to the femur or acetabular bone needs further investigation.
© 2015 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Infection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25708034      PMCID: PMC6583115          DOI: 10.1111/os.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  4 in total

1.  One-stage exchange with antibacterial hydrogel coated implants provides similar results to two-stage revision, without the coating, for the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection.

Authors:  Nicola Capuano; Nicola Logoluso; Enrico Gallazzi; Lorenzo Drago; Carlo Luca Romanò
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moataz El-Husseiny; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Does cemented or cementless single-stage exchange arthroplasty of chronic periprosthetic hip infections provide similar infection rates to a two-stage? A systematic review.

Authors:  D A George; N Logoluso; G Castellini; S Gianola; S Scarponi; F S Haddad; L Drago; C L Romano
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  One-Stage Arthroplasty or Revision for Seronegative Infections in Hip and Knee.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Wang; Rui Zhang Md; Ze-Yu Luo; Duan Wang Md PhD; Fu-Xing Pei; Xin Tang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.