Literature DB >> 25707337

DNA copy number variations are important in the complex genetic architecture of müllerian disorders.

Ruth McGowan1, Graham Tydeman2, David Shapiro3, Tracey Craig4, Norma Morrison4, Susan Logan5, Adam H Balen6, S Faisal Ahmed7, Miriam Deeny8, John Tolmie9, Edward S Tobias10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clinically and genetically investigate women with müllerian disorders, including Mayer-Rokitanksy-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome.
DESIGN: Two-year prospective clinical and laboratory study.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Thirty-five women over 16 years of age with a müllerian disorder, including MRKH. INTERVENTION(S): Women were recruited from specialist gynecology clinics or identified from the Scottish Disorders of Sex Development Register (www.sdsd.scot.nhs.uk/index.html). Associated abnormalities were detected by clinical examination, imaging studies, and biochemical analyses. Chromosomal microduplications and microdeletions were detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and validated by fluorescence in situ hydridization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Identification of associated congenital and biochemical abnormalities and identification of regions of genomic imbalance using array CGH. RESULT(S): Associated congenital anomalies were common, present in 25/35 (71%) of affected women, particularly renal and skeletal abnormalities, which were present in 15/35 (43%) and 17/35 (49%) women, respectively. Using array CGH, novel or recurrent regions of genomic imbalance were identified in 4/11 (36%) women with MRKH and in 5/24 (21%) women with other müllerian abnormalities. CONCLUSION(S): Additional congenital abnormalities and regions of genomic imbalance are common in women with müllerian disorders, including MRKH. Recurrent microdeletions and microduplications associated with MRKH implicate specific possibly causative genes. The investigation of women with müllerian disorders should be thorough, and array CGH should be considered, given the potential highly significant familial implications of a chromosomal abnormality.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNV; MRKH; Müllerian; array CGH

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25707337     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanistic Drivers of Müllerian Duct Development and Differentiation Into the Oviduct.

Authors:  Laura Santana Gonzalez; Ioanna A Rota; Mara Artibani; Matteo Morotti; Zhiyuan Hu; Nina Wietek; Abdulkhaliq Alsaadi; Ashwag Albukhari; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler; Ahmed A Ahmed
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-08

2.  Genetics of agenesis/hypoplasia of the uterus and vagina: narrowing down the number of candidate genes for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome.

Authors:  Sasha Mikhael; Sonal Dugar; Madison Morton; Lynn P Chorich; Kerlene Berwick Tam; Amy C Lossie; Hyung-Goo Kim; James Knight; Hugh S Taylor; Souhrid Mukherjee; John A Capra; John A Phillips; Michael Friez; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.881

Review 3.  Vertebral defect, anal atresia, cardiac defect, tracheoesophageal fistula/esophageal atresia, renal defect, and limb defect association with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in co-occurrence: two case reports and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer; Morten Herlin; Niels Qvist; Michael B Petersen
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-21

4.  Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia.

Authors:  Durkadin Demir Eksi; Yiping Shen; Munire Erman; Lynn P Chorich; Megan E Sullivan; Meric Bilekdemir; Elanur Yılmaz; Guven Luleci; Hyung-Goo Kim; Ozgul M Alper; Lawrence C Layman
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Detection of de novo genetic variants in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome by whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Hong-Xin Pan; Guang-Nan Luo; Sheng-Qing Wan; Cheng-Lu Qin; Jie Tang; Meng Zhang; Min Du; Ke-Ke Xu; Jin-Qiu Shi
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-08-02

6.  Clinical and Radiological Findings in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome Type 2: Case report.

Authors:  Samih A Odhaib; Miaad J Mohammed; Ahmed J H Al-Ali; Abbas Ali Mansour
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 7.  Identification of Genetic Causes in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Varvara Ermioni Triantafyllidi; Despoina Mavrogianni; Andreas Kalampalikis; Michael Litos; Stella Roidi; Lina Michala
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 8.  Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update.

Authors:  Morten Krogh Herlin; Michael Bjørn Petersen; Mats Brännström
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 9.  Studying Müllerian duct anomalies - from cataloguing phenotypes to discovering causation.

Authors:  Laura Santana González; Mara Artibani; Ahmed Ashour Ahmed
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.758

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.