| Literature DB >> 25706999 |
Mayilvahanan Shanmugam1, Prerna Gopal1, Faiha El Abbar1, Helen C Schreiner1, Jeffrey B Kaplan1, Daniel H Fine1, Narayanan Ramasubbu1.
Abstract
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans a causative agent of periodontal disease in humans, forms biofilm on biotic and abiotic surfaces. A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilm is heterogeneous in nature and is composed of proteins, extracellular DNA and exopolysaccharide. To explore the role played by the exopolysaccharide in the colonization and disease progression, we employed genetic reduction approach using our rat model of A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced periodontitis. To this end, a genetically modified strain of A. actinomycetemcomitans lacking the pga operon was compared with the wild-type strain in the rat infection model. The parent and mutant strains were primarily evaluated for bone resorption and disease. Our study showed that colonization, bone resorption/disease and antibody response were all elevated in the wild-type fed rats. The bone resorption/disease caused by the pga mutant strain, lacking the exopolysaccharide, was significantly less (P < 0.05) than the bone resorption/disease caused by the wild-type strain. Further analysis of the expression levels of selected virulence genes through RT-PCR showed that the decrease in colonization, bone resorption and antibody titer in the absence of the exopolysaccharide might be due to attenuated levels of colonization genes, flp-1, apiA and aae in the mutant strain. This study demonstrates that the effect exerted by the exopolysaccharide in A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced bone resorption has hitherto not been recognized and underscores the role played by the exopolysaccharide in A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25706999 PMCID: PMC4338281 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Scheme for colonization and bone resorption.
Fig 2Sites for A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced bone-loss measurement.
Three molars of one side of the rat maxillae are shown. Sites A through J were numbered similarly in side of the jaw and measurements were taken from the CEJ to the ABC. Dashed lines indicate where additional measurements were made as and when necessary.
Primers used for qPCR analysis.
| Gene | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
|---|---|---|
|
| ATCAGCCCTTTGTCTTTCCTAG | TGACCAAGTAAACTATCGCCG |
|
| TGGTGCTACTTCTGTTTCCTC | ATCTTGAACCTAGTGTGGCTG |
|
| TGCATTAAGACAGGAACCCG | TGCTCTCGACGTGGTAAATG |
|
| CTCTACATCAGCCTTATCCGC | TGATGGAAATCTGGAAGGCG |
|
| TCAAAGCAGCTGAAGCAATC | GCGATAAAACCATTGTTGCTG |
|
| TGGCAGCCGTTTAAATGTTG | ATTTCGCGAGTCATAGAACC |
|
| AATTCAAATCATGCCGGAAG | TGCGATTCAGTTCCAATACG |
|
| AAATGCGTAGAGATGTGGAGG | TATCTAATCCTGTTTGCTCCCC |
Fig 3Confocal scanning laser microscopic image of biofilms.
Biofilm growth was imaged at seven different locations and averaged for analysis.
A. actinomycetemcomitans induced colonization, antibody level and bone resorption.
| Group | Disease | Disease site | Total bone resorption (mm) | Antibody Concentration 12 weeks (post inoculation) (μg/mL) | Colonization (cfu/mL) 2 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | |||||
| 1–1 | No | None | 143.7 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 1–2 | No | None | 153.7 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 1–3 | No | None | 147.1 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 1–4 | No | None | 141.5 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 1–5 | No | None | 114.6 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 1–6 | No | None | 157.2 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Mean ± SD | 142.9 ± 15.1 | ||||
| EA1002 | |||||
| 2–1 | No | None | 141.9 | 193 | 0 |
| 2–2 | No | None | 130.4 | 438 | 0 |
| 2–3 | No | None | 129.3 | 228 | 0 |
| 2–4 | No | JL | 144.5 | 119 | 0 |
| 2–5 | No | None | 138.8 | 244 | 260 |
| 2–6 | No | None | 134.3 | 364 | 20 |
| Mean ± SD | 136.5 ± 6.2 | 263 ± 116 | |||
| Wild-type | |||||
| 3–1 | Yes | IL,JL, GR,HR,IR | 172.4 | 134 | 0 |
| 3–2 | Yes | IR,JR | 160.1 | 322 | 240 |
| 3–3 | Yes | EL—JL; DR—JR | 200.4 | 194 | 70 |
| 3–4 | Yes | AL-CL, FL; AR, DR-GR, | 184.0 | 594 | 70 |
| 3–5 | No | JL, JR | 156.5 | 300 | 350 |
| 3–6 | No | JL, AR, JR | 156.05 | 414 | 20 |
| Mean ± SD | 171.6 ± 17.8 | 326 ± 124 | ND |
† P = 0.0006, 0.0029, against control and EA1002, respectively.
‡ L = left; R = right; A-J = sites for bone resorption analysis [24].
$$ P = 0.741 for EA1002 vs. wild-type; P = 0.001 for wild-type vs. Control and P = 0.004 for EA1002 vs. Control.
Fig 4Amplification of leukotoxin gene using genomic PCR for recovery of A. actinomycetemcomitans from rats at 12-weeks post infection.
The A. actinomycetemcomitans genomic DNA was used as a positive control. Only wild-type (IDH781) fed rats show the presence of ltxA.
Fig 5Expression of virulence genes in the A. actinomycetemcomitans strains.
Total mRNA was isolated, and relative levels of the genes were quantified by qPCR as described in the text. Results are means ± standard deviations for triplicate cultures normalized to the result with 16S rRNA. The fold changes in the mRNA levels of the genes that are significantly different between the strains are shown by asterisks as measured by Student’s t test.