OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the learning needs of pediatric critical care (PCC) physicians in bedside ultrasound (BUS) use. METHODS: This was a survey-based study conducted at an academic center with a PCC fellowship program. We surveyed PCC fellows and faculty to elicit their views on BUS and asked them about the frequency of use, their perception of the clinical utility, and their level of confidence in performing different BUS applications. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the self-reported use of BUS applications in the faculty and fellows, except for cardiac arrest, which 66.7% of the faculty used but none of the fellows did (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between perceived usefulness and confidence in the performance of BUS applications between the fellows and faculty. The largest gaps between perceived usefulness and confidence in performing BUS applications were for left ventricle ejection fraction (Δ = 2.72), inferior vena cava collapse (Δ = 2.67), pulmonary edema (Δ = 2.22), and pneumothorax (Δ = 2.11). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric critical care providers report limited confidence in several applications that they perceive as useful and are therefore likely motivated to learn BUS applications. Concentrating curricula on those applications with the greatest differences between usefulness and confidence and building on the confidence of those applications the PCC providers are already using will serve to expand availability and increase use of this high-impact technology.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the learning needs of pediatric critical care (PCC) physicians in bedside ultrasound (BUS) use. METHODS: This was a survey-based study conducted at an academic center with a PCC fellowship program. We surveyed PCC fellows and faculty to elicit their views on BUS and asked them about the frequency of use, their perception of the clinical utility, and their level of confidence in performing different BUS applications. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the self-reported use of BUS applications in the faculty and fellows, except for cardiac arrest, which 66.7% of the faculty used but none of the fellows did (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between perceived usefulness and confidence in the performance of BUS applications between the fellows and faculty. The largest gaps between perceived usefulness and confidence in performing BUS applications were for left ventricle ejection fraction (Δ = 2.72), inferior vena cava collapse (Δ = 2.67), pulmonary edema (Δ = 2.22), and pneumothorax (Δ = 2.11). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric critical care providers report limited confidence in several applications that they perceive as useful and are therefore likely motivated to learn BUS applications. Concentrating curricula on those applications with the greatest differences between usefulness and confidence and building on the confidence of those applications the PCC providers are already using will serve to expand availability and increase use of this high-impact technology.
Authors: Ryan L DeSanti; Eileen A Cowan; Pierre D Kory; Michael R Lasarev; Jessica Schmidt; Awni M Al-Subu Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Delia L Gold; Jennifer R Marin; Demetris Haritos; L Melissa Skaugset; Jennifer M Kline; Rachel M Stanley; David P Way; David P Bahner Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2017-08-29
Authors: Elsa A van Wassenaer; Joost G Daams; Marc A Benninga; Karen Rosendahl; Bart G P Koot; Samuel Stafrace; Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-04-10
Authors: Amy Z Zhou; Robert S Green; Elizabeth J Haines; Michelle N Vazquez; Ee T Tay; James W Tsung Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.454