Literature DB >> 25706720

Magnetically Inserted Neural Electrodes: Tissue Response and Functional Lifetime.

Ian D Dryg, Matthew P Ward, Kurt Y Qing, Henry Mei, Jeremy E Schaffer, Pedro P Irazoqui.   

Abstract

Neural recording and stimulation have great clinical potential. Long-term neural recording remains a challenge, however, as implantable electrodes eventually fail due to the adverse effects of the host tissue response to the indwelling implant. Astrocytes and microglia attempt to engulf the electrode, increasing the electrical impedance between the electrode and neurons, and possibly pushing neurons away from the recording site. Faster insertion speed, finer tip geometry, smaller size, and lower material stiffness all seem to decrease damage caused by insertion and reduce the intensity of the tissue response. However, electrodes that are too small result in buckling, making insertion impossible. In this paper, we assess the viability of high-speed (27.8 m/s) deployment of 25 μm, ferromagnetic microelectrodes into rat brain. To characterize functionality of magnetically inserted electrodes, 4 Long-Evans rats were implanted for 31 days with impedance measurements and neural recordings taken daily. Performance was compared to 150 μm diameter PlasticsOne electrodes since 25 μm electrodes buckled during "slow speed" insertion. Platinum-iron magnetically inserted electrodes resolved single unit activity throughout the duration of the study in one rat, and saw no significant change (p=0.970) in impedance (4.54% increase) from day 0 (Z0 ≈ 144 kΩ,Z31 ≈ 150 kΩ). These findings provide a proof-of-concept for magnetic insertion as a viable insertion method that enables nonbuckling implantation of small (25 μm) microelectrodes, with potential for neural recording applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25706720     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2399856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

1.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Recent Advances in Neural Electrode-Tissue Interfaces.

Authors:  Kevin Woeppel; Qianru Yang; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-23

Review 3.  A comparison of insertion methods for surgical placement of penetrating neural interfaces.

Authors:  Brianna Thielen; Ellis Meng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A Mosquito Inspired Strategy to Implant Microprobes into the Brain.

Authors:  Andrew J Shoffstall; Suraj Srinivasan; Mitchell Willis; Allison M Stiller; Melanie Ecker; Walter E Voit; Joseph J Pancrazio; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes.

Authors:  Nicholas V Apollo; Brendan Murphy; Kayla Prezelski; Nicolette Driscoll; Andrew G Richardson; Timothy H Lucas; Flavia Vitale
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Slow insertion of silicon probes improves the quality of acute neuronal recordings.

Authors:  Richárd Fiáth; Adrienn Lilla Márton; Ferenc Mátyás; Domonkos Pinke; Gergely Márton; Kinga Tóth; István Ulbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Alexey Mikhaylov; Alexey Pimashkin; Yana Pigareva; Svetlana Gerasimova; Evgeny Gryaznov; Sergey Shchanikov; Anton Zuev; Max Talanov; Igor Lavrov; Vyacheslav Demin; Victor Erokhin; Sergey Lobov; Irina Mukhina; Victor Kazantsev; Huaqiang Wu; Bernardo Spagnolo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.