Literature DB >> 25706404

The time window of multisensory integration: relating reaction times and judgments of temporal order.

Adele Diederich1, Hans Colonius2.   

Abstract

Even though visual and auditory information of 1 and the same event often do not arrive at the sensory receptors at the same time, due to different physical transmission times of the modalities, the brain maintains a unitary perception of the event, at least within a certain range of sensory arrival time differences. The properties of this "temporal window of integration" (TWIN), its recalibration due to task requirements, attention, and other variables, have recently been investigated intensively. Up to now, however, there has been no consistent definition of "temporal window" across different paradigms for measuring its width. Here we propose such a definition based on our TWIN model (Colonius & Diederich, 2004). It applies to judgments of temporal order (or simultaneity) as well as to reaction time (RT) paradigms. Reanalyzing data from Mégevand, Molholm, Nayak, & Foxe (2013) by fitting the TWIN model to data from both paradigms, we confirmed the authors' hypothesis that the temporal window in an RT task tends to be wider than in a temporal-order judgment (TOJ) task. This first step toward a unified concept of TWIN should be a valuable tool in guiding investigations of the neural and cognitive bases of this so-far-somewhat elusive concept. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25706404     DOI: 10.1037/a0038696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  22 in total

1.  Impaired timing of audiovisual events in the elderly.

Authors:  Gillian Bedard; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The processing of visual and auditory information for reaching movements.

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Timothy N Welsh; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-08

3.  Multisensory integration is independent of perceived simultaneity.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Atypical audiovisual temporal function in autism and schizophrenia: similar phenotype, different cause.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Computational principles and models of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues.

Authors:  Vincent Hoofs; Ivan Grahek; C Nico Boehler; Ruth M Krebs
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  To bridge or not to bridge the multisensory time gap: bimanual coordination to sound and touch with temporal lags.

Authors:  C Roy; S Dalla Bella; J Lagarde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Behavioral, perceptual, and neural alterations in sensory and multisensory function in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Visual and Auditory Components in the Perception of Asynchronous Audiovisual Speech.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-11-30

10.  Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects.

Authors:  Nestor Matthews; Leslie Welch; Rebecca Achtman; Rachel Fenton; Brynn FitzGerald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.