Literature DB >> 25706363

ACR appropriateness Criteria® infertility.

Darci J Wall1, Marcia C Javitt, Phyllis Glanc, Priyadarshani R Bhosale, Mukesh G Harisinghani, Robert D Harris, Nadia J Khati, Donald G Mitchell, David A Nyberg, Pari V Pandharipande, Harpreet K Pannu, Thomas D Shipp, Cary Lynn Siegel, Lynn Simpson, Jade J Wong-You-Cheong, Carolyn M Zelop.   

Abstract

Appropriate imaging for women undergoing infertility workup depends upon the clinician's suspicion for potential causes of infertility. Transvaginal US is the preferred modality to assess the ovaries for features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the leading cause of anovulatory infertility. For women who have a history or clinical suspicion of endometriosis, which affects at least one third of women with infertility, both MRI and pelvic US can provide valuable information. If tubal occlusion is suspected, whether due to endometriosis, previous pelvic inflammatory disease, or other cause, hysterosalpingogram (HSG) is the preferred method of evaluation. To assess for anatomic causes of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) such as Müllerian anomalies, synechiae, and leiomyomas, saline infusion sonohysterography, MRI and 3-D US are most appropriate. Up to 10% of women suffering recurrent pregnancy loss have a congenital Müllerian anomaly. When assessment of the pituitary gland is indicated, MRI is the imaging exam of choice.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25706363     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of uterine and tubal pathology identified by transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, and hysteroscopy in female patients with infertility.

Authors:  Catherine H Phillips; Carol B Benson; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Mary C Frates
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-23

2.  Niche role of MRI in the evaluation of female infertility.

Authors:  Shabnam Bhandari Grover; Neha Antil; Amit Katyan; Heena Rajani; Hemal Grover; Pratima Mittal; Sudha Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2020-03-30

3.  Application of transvaginal two-dimensional fundamental sonosalpingography in infertile women with tubo-ovarian cyst.

Authors:  Zining Xu; Ya'er Lv; Qiongxiao Huang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-10

Review 4.  Hysterosalpingography using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for infertility patients.

Authors:  Leandro Accardo de Mattos; Luísa Jacques Sauer; Roberto Blasbalg; Carlos Aberto Petta; Ricardo Mendes Pereira; Luiz Fernando Pina de Carvalho
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-07-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.