Nanna Rolving1, Claus Vinther Nielsen, Finn Bjarke Christensen, Randi Holm, Cody Eric Bünger, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard. 1. *Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark †Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; and §Elective Surgery Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial including 90 patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a preoperative cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBT) for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few published studies have looked at the potential of rehabilitation to improve outcomes after LSF. Rehabilitation programs using CBT are recommended. Furthermore, initiating interventions preoperatively seems beneficial, but only limited data exist in the field of spine surgery. METHODS:Patients with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis undergoing LSF were randomized to usual care (control group) or preoperative CBT and usual care (CBT group). Primary outcome was change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were catastrophizing, fear avoidance belief, work status, and back and leg pain. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference between the CBT group and the control group in Oswestry Disability Index score (P = 0.082). However, the CBT group had achieved a significant reduction of -15 points (-26; -4) already at 3 months (between group difference P = 0.003), and this reduction was maintained throughout the year. There were no differences between groups at 1-year follow-up with regard to any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Participating in a preoperative CBT intervention in addition to usual care did not produce better outcomes at 1-year follow-up for patients undergoing LSF. Although the reduction in disability was achieved much faster in the CBT group, resulting in a significant difference between groups already 3 months after surgery, it did not translate into a faster return to work. Our findings support the need for further research into the use of targeted rehabilitation interventions among patients with elevated levels of catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial including 90 patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a preoperative cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBT) for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few published studies have looked at the potential of rehabilitation to improve outcomes after LSF. Rehabilitation programs using CBT are recommended. Furthermore, initiating interventions preoperatively seems beneficial, but only limited data exist in the field of spine surgery. METHODS:Patients with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis undergoing LSF were randomized to usual care (control group) or preoperative CBT and usual care (CBT group). Primary outcome was change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were catastrophizing, fear avoidance belief, work status, and back and leg pain. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference between the CBT group and the control group in Oswestry Disability Index score (P = 0.082). However, the CBT group had achieved a significant reduction of -15 points (-26; -4) already at 3 months (between group difference P = 0.003), and this reduction was maintained throughout the year. There were no differences between groups at 1-year follow-up with regard to any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Participating in a preoperative CBT intervention in addition to usual care did not produce better outcomes at 1-year follow-up for patients undergoing LSF. Although the reduction in disability was achieved much faster in the CBT group, resulting in a significant difference between groups already 3 months after surgery, it did not translate into a faster return to work. Our findings support the need for further research into the use of targeted rehabilitation interventions among patients with elevated levels of catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Authors: Dean A Tripp; Edward Abraham; Maude Lambert; Kate Wagg; Erin Bigney; Eden Daly; Phylicia Verreault; Neil Manson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jennifer A Rabbitts; Rachel V Aaron; Emma Fisher; Emily A Lang; Caroline Bridgwater; Gabrielle Ghafari Tai; Tonya M Palermo Journal: J Pain Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Leeanne Nicklas; Mairi Albiston; Martin Dunbar; Alan Gillies; Jennifer Hislop; Helen Moffat; Judy Thomson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Zeeshan Butt; Andrea F DiMartini; Qian Liu; Mary Ann Simpson; Abigail R Smith; Jarcy Zee; Brenda W Gillespie; Susan Holtzman; Daniela Ladner; Kim Olthoff; Robert A Fisher; Silvia Hafliger; Chris E Freise; Mercedes Susan Mandell; Averell H Sherker; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Rogelio A Coronado; Dawn M Ehde; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Clinton J Devin; Stephen T Wegener; Kristin R Archer Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-09-28
Authors: Basma Mohamed; Ramani Ramachandran; Ferenc Rabai; Catherine C Price; Adam Polifka; Daniel Hoh; Christoph N Seubert Journal: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 3.956