Maksym Seredyuk1, M Carmen Muñoz2, José A Real3, Turganbay S Iskenderov1. 1. National Taras Shevchenko University, Department of Chemistry, Volodymyrska str. 64, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine. 2. Departamento de Fisica Aplicada, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain. 3. Institut de Ciencia Molecular (ICMol), Departament de Quimica Inorganica, Universitat de Valencia, C/Catedratico José Beltran Martinez, 2, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract
The title complex, poly[dodeca-μ-cyanido-diiron(III)triplat-inum(II)], [Fe(III) 2{Pt(II)(CN)4}3], has a three-dimensional polymeric structure. It is built-up from square-planar [Pt(II)(CN)4](2-) anions (point group symmetry 2/m) bridging cationic [Fe(III)Pt(II)(CN)4](+) ∞ layers extending in the bc plane. The Fe(II) atoms of the layers are located on inversion centres and exhibit an octa-hedral coordination sphere defined by six N atoms of cyanide ligands, while the Pt(II) atoms are located on twofold rotation axes and are surrounded by four C atoms of the cyanide ligands in a square-planar coordination. The geometrical preferences of the two cations for octa-hedral and square-planar coordination, respectively, lead to a corrugated organisation of the layers. The distance between neighbouring [Fe(III)Pt(II)(CN)4](+) ∞ layers corresponds to the length a/2 = 8.0070 (3) Å, and the separation between two neighbouring Pt(II) atoms of the bridging [Pt(II)(CN)4](2-) groups corresponds to the length of the c axis [7.5720 (2) Å]. The structure is porous with accessible voids of 390 Å(3) per unit cell.
The title complex, poly[dodeca-μ-cyanido-diiron(III)triplat-inum(II)], [Fe(III) 2{Pt(II)(CN)4}3], has a three-dimensional polymeric structure. It is built-up from square-planar [Pt(II)(CN)4](2-) anions (point group symmetry 2/m) bridging cationic [Fe(III)Pt(II)(CN)4](+) ∞ layers extending in the bc plane. The Fe(II) atoms of the layers are located on inversion centres and exhibit an octa-hedral coordination sphere defined by six N atoms of cyanide ligands, while the Pt(II) atoms are located on twofold rotation axes and are surrounded by four C atoms of the cyanide ligands in a square-planar coordination. The geometrical preferences of the two cations for octa-hedral and square-planar coordination, respectively, lead to a corrugated organisation of the layers. The distance between neighbouring [Fe(III)Pt(II)(CN)4](+) ∞ layers corresponds to the length a/2 = 8.0070 (3) Å, and the separation between two neighbouring Pt(II) atoms of the bridging [Pt(II)(CN)4](2-) groups corresponds to the length of the c axis [7.5720 (2) Å]. The structure is porous with accessible voids of 390 Å(3) per unit cell.
Coordination compounds have interesting properties in catalysis (Kanderal et al., 2005 ▸; Penkova et al., 2009 ▸) or as photoactive materials (Yan et al., 2012 ▸). Magnetically active polycyanidometallate network complexes of FeII [FeII
L
2{M
I(CN)2}2] or [FeII
L
2{M
II(CN)4}] (M
I = Ag, Au; M
II = Ni, Pd, Pt; L = N-heterocyclic ligand) have been studied because they show versatile polymeric structures (Piñeiro-López et al. 2014 ▸; Seredyuk et al., 2007 ▸, 2009 ▸), spin transition (Muñoz & Real, 2013 ▸) and functionalities such as sorption–desorption of organic and inorganic molecules (Muñoz & Real, 2013 ▸) or reversible chemosorption (Arcís-Castillo et al., 2013 ▸).
Oxford Diffraction Gemini S Ultra diffractometerAbsorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995 ▸) T
min = 0.611, T
max = 0.7723358 measured reflections1909 independent reflections1568 reflections with I > 2σ(I)R
int = 0.038
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999 ▸); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▸); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▸) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸).Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014026188/wm5094sup1.cifStructure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014026188/wm5094Isup2.hklClick here for additional data file.Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014026188/wm5094Isup3.cdxClick here for additional data file.x y z x y z x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014026188/wm5094fig1.tifDisplacement ellipsoid plot (30% probability level) of the principal building units of the structure of the title compound. [Symmetry codes: (i) + x, + y, 1 + z; (ii) 0.5 – x, + y, 1 – z, (iii) x, 1 – y, 1 + z.]Click here for additional data file.c 6 4 . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989014026188/wm5094fig2.tifA fragment of three-dimentional coordination polymer of the title compound in a perspective view along c. Polyhedra correspond to FeN6 and PtC4 chromophores.CCDC reference: 1036669Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.106
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0615P)2 + 15.455P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.97
(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1909 reflections
Δρmax = 1.25 e Å−3
71 parameters
Δρmin = −1.33 e Å−3
0 restraints
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be
even larger.
Authors: Zulema Arcís-Castillo; Francisco J Muñoz-Lara; M Carmen Muñoz; Daniel Aravena; Ana B Gaspar; Juan F Sánchez-Royo; Eliseo Ruiz; Masaaki Ohba; Ryotaro Matsuda; Susumu Kitagawa; José A Real Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Olga M Kanderal; Henryk Kozlowski; Agnieszka Dobosz; Jolanta Swiatek-Kozlowska; Franc Meyer; Igor O Fritsky Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Maksym Seredyuk; Matti Haukka; Igor O Fritsky; Henryk Kozłowski; Roland Krämer; Vadim A Pavlenko; Philipp Gütlich Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Larysa V Penkova; Anna Maciag; Elena V Rybak-Akimova; Matti Haukka; Vadim A Pavlenko; Turganbay S Iskenderov; Henryk Kozłowski; Franc Meyer; Igor O Fritsky Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 5.165