Literature DB >> 25705235

In vivo and in vitro metabolites from the main diester and monoester diterpenoid alkaloids in a traditional chinese herb, the aconitum species.

Min Zhang1, Chong-Sheng Peng1, Xiao-Bo Li1.   

Abstract

Diester diterpenoid alkaloids (DDAs), such as aconitine (AC), mesaconitine (MA), and hypaconitine (HA), are both pharmacologically active compounds and toxic ingredients in a traditional Chinese herb, the Aconitum species. Many DDA metabolism studies have been performed to explore mechanisms for reducing toxicity in these compounds and in Aconitum species extracts for safe clinical administration. In this review, we summarize recent progress on the metabolism of toxic AC, MA, and HA and corresponding monoester diterpenoid alkaloids (MDAs) in the gastrointestinal tract and liver in different animal species and humans in vivo and/or in vitro, where these alkaloids are primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes, carboxylesterases, and intestinal bacteria, which produces phase I metabolites, ester hydrolysed products, and lipoalkaloids. Furthermore, we classify metabolites detected in the blood and urine, where the aforementioned metabolites are absorbed and excreted. Less toxic MDAs and nontoxic alcohol amines are the primary DDA metabolites detected in the blood. Most other DDAs metabolites produced in the intestine and liver detected in the urine have not been reported in the blood. We propose an explanation for this nonconformity. Finally, taking AC, for instance, we generalize a process of toxicity reduction in the body after oral AC administration for the first time.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25705235      PMCID: PMC4332761          DOI: 10.1155/2015/252434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med        ISSN: 1741-427X            Impact factor:   2.629


1. Introduction

Diester diterpenoid alkaloids (DDAs, Table 1), such as aconitine (AC), mesaconitine (MA), and hypaconitine (HA), are a family of highly toxic alkaloids from the root of a traditional Chinese herb, the Aconitum species (sp.), which has been used clinically for years. Monoester diterpenoid alkaloids (MDAs, Table 1) are the ester hydrolysis products of DDAs at the C-8 position, which are also components of this herb. Both DDAs and MDAs exhibit excellent pharmacological effects, including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and cardiotonic activities [1, 2].
Table 1

DDA, MDA, and alcohol amine chemical structures.


CompoundsR1 R2 R3 R4 FormulaMass

DDAs
 Aconitine (AC)Ethyl (Et)Hydroxy (OH)Acetyl (Ac)Benzoyl (Bz)C34H47NO11 645.3149
 Mesaconitine (MA)Methyl (Me)OHAcBzC33H45NO11 631.2992
 Hypaconitine (HA)MeHydrogen (H)AcBzC33H45NO10 615.3043
MDAs
 Benzoylaconine (BAC)EtOHHBzC32H45NO10 603.3043
 Benzoylmesaconine (BMA)MeOHHBzC31H43NO10 589.2887
 Benzoylhypaconine (BHA)MeHHBzC31H43NO9 573.2938
Alcohol amines
 AconineEtOHHHC25H41NO9 499.2781
 MesaconineMeOHHHC24H39NO9 485.2625
 HypaconineMeHHHC24H39NO8 469.2676
However, these compounds, especially DDAs, have narrow therapeutic windows. For example, a single lethal AC dose for humans is estimated at 2–6 mg [3, 4] with poisoning symptoms, such as hypotension, palpitations, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, asystole, and numbness of the face and limbs [1]. Severe poisoning may occur after improper ingestion of DDA-containing drugs or prescriptions, such as Chuanwu [5], Caowu [6], and Fuzi [7]. Therefore, Aconitum herbs are traditionally boiled or steamed before oral administration to ensure safety [8]. During this process, DDAs are mainly hydrolysed to less toxic MDAs. Further MDA hydrolysis yields almost nontoxic alcohol amines (Table 1), such as aconine, mesaconine, and hypaconine [3, 9, 10]. In contrast with AC, the half-maximal lethal dose (LD50, mg/kg, i.v. mice) of 14-benzoylaconine (BAC) and aconine increases by approximately 38- and 430-fold, respectively [11]. On the other hand, many valuable studies have recently been performed on DDA and MDA metabolism to explore the toxicity reduction mechanisms and obtain information for clinical guidance. In this paper, we review for the first time the metabolites biotransformed in the gastrointestinal tract and liver from toxic AC, MA, and HA of DDAs as well as their corresponding ester hydrolysed products, BAC, 14-benzoylmesaconine (BMA), and 14-benzoylhypaconine (BHA) of MDAs, in different animal species and humans in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we classify the metabolites detected in the blood and urine, in which these metabolites are absorbed and excreted. Our study will be fundamental and helpful for further studies on reducing the toxicity of DDA-containing drugs compatible with other medicine based on DDAs absorption and metabolism [12, 13].

2. Metabolism in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Liver

Traditional Chinese prescriptions are commonly prepared through decoction and ingested orally. The active compounds are unavoidably converted in the gastrointestinal tract.

2.1. Metabolism in the Stomach

The stomach provides an acidic environment for drug dissolution and absorption; however, studies on stomach metabolism are typically ignored. Only one study has focused on AC metabolism in the stomach. In this study, 14 metabolites and 2 ester hydrolysis products are identified in gastric content in rabbits after oral AC administration [14]. Metabolism includes hydroxylation, deoxylation, demethylation, didemethylation/deethylation, and ester exchange at the C-8 position with long chain fatty acids (Table 2). The enzymes responsible for metabolism have not been reported. The aforementioned metabolic process may be catalysed by CYP2C9 and CYP2C8 that are expressed in parietal gastric cells [15] and by bacteria that are located in the human stomach [16].
Table 2

AC metabolites produced in rabbit stomachs.

DDAs m/z(ESI+)FormulaIdentificationNeutral loss (Da), identification of fatty acidMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences
AC662C34H47NO12 2′-Hydroxy AC or 3′-AC (M1)a NAb Rabbits and rats; ig, in vivo.IT, FT-ICR [14]
3′-Hydroxy AC or 2′-hydroxy AC (M3)a
4′-Hydroxy AC (M6)a
632C33H45NO11 Demethyl AC (M4)NA
630C34H47NO10 Indaconitine (15-deoxy AC, M5)c NA
Deoxyaconitine (3-deoxy AC, M7)
618C32H43NO11 Didemethyl AC or N-deethyl AC (M2)NA
604C32H45NO10 BAC (hydrolysis product 2)NARabbits and rats; ig, in vivo.IT, FT-ICR
542C27H43NO10 14-O-Debenzoyl AC (hydrolysis product 1)NARabbits and rats; ig, in vivo.IT, FT-ICR
828C47H73NO11 8-O-Pentadecanoyl BAC (M10)242, pentadecanoic acidRabbits and rats; ig, in vivo.IT, FT-ICR
842C48H75NO11 8-O-Palmitoyl BAC (M12)256, palmitic acid
864C50H73NO11 8-O-Linolenoyl BAC (M9)278, linolenic acid
866C50H75NO11 8-O-Linoleoyl BAC (M11)280, linoleic acid
868C50H77NO11 8-O-Oleoyl BAC (M13)282, oleic acid
870C50H79NO11 8-O-Stearoyl BAC (M14)284, stearic acid
978 C58H91NO11 8-O-Hexacosandienoyl BAC (M8)392, hexacosandienoic acid

a2′, 3′, and 4′, the position in benzoyl group.

bNot available.

cDeoxy may also be referred to as dehydroxy in the literature.

The ester hydrolysis products at the C-8 and C-14 positions are not only observed in rabbit stomachs but also in acid solutions (negative control). Ester hydrolysis in the stomach may be catalysed by carboxylesterases (CEs) in the gastric mucosa [17] because CE expression has also been reported in the stomach, although CEs are predominantly distributed in the liver, plasma, and intestine [18]. However, this finding also implies that DDAs can be nonenzymatically ester hydrolysed under acidic conditions, which is discussed in Section 5. In addition, AC, MA, HA, and their hydrolysis products (MDAs and alcohol amines) are detected in gastric contents in a dead female, who was suspected of dying from acute drug poisoning involving Aconitum alkaloids [19]. However, the reference did not indicate whether the hydrolysis products were metabolized from DDAs in the stomach or were originally in the toxicant.

2.2. Metabolism in the Intestine

A large number of bacteria populate the gastrointestinal tract; the bacterial concentration increases distally. The majority of bacteria reside in the colon, where the density approaches 1011-1012 cells/mL, and anaerobic species dominate. This microbiota secretes a diverse array of enzymes that participate in various metabolic processes, such as reduction, hydrolysis, deoxylation, acetylation, deacetylation, and N-demethylation; thus, the intestinal microbiota is important to orally ingested drug metabolism [20, 21]. Notably, hydrolysis catalysed by bacteria is common in glycosides. Based on DDA and MDA structures, ester hydrolysis is likely driven by CEs, which also dominate the intestine [18]. The intestinal bacteria DDA metabolism reviewed herein was mainly performed in vitro through anaerobic incubation in a feces suspension, which included high levels of intestinal bacteria. The intestinal bacteria DDA metabolism is similar to metabolism in the stomach and included hydroxylation, deoxylation, demethylation, demethylation with deoxylation, ester hydrolysis at the C-8 and/or C-14 position, and ester exchange at the C-8 position with short and long chain fatty acids (Table 3). AC metabolites, such as 16-O-demethyl AC, 3-deoxy AC, and 16-O-demethyl-3-deoxy AC, were further converted to deoxylation, demethylation, ester hydrolysis, and ester exchange products (Table 4). These results imply that MDAs, which are DDA ester hydrolysed products, may be metabolized through the same pathway; however, no studies have reported on intestinal MDA metabolism.
Table 3

Metabolites of AC, MA, and HA converted in intestine.

DDAs m/z (ESI+)FormulaIdentificationNeutral loss (Da), identification of fatty acidMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences
AC662C34H47NO12 10-Hydroxy ACNAa Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P4)
632C33H45NO11 16-O-Demethyl AC* NARabbits; contents from small intestine and caecum and feces; ig, in vivo.IT[23] (M3)
Human; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24] (M1)
630 C34H47NO10 Indaconitine (15-deoxy AC)b Rabbits; contents from small intestine and caecum and feces; ig, in vivo.IT[23] (M6)
Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P5)
Deoxy AC* NARabbits; contents from small intestine and caecum and feces; ig, in vivo.IT[23] (M5)
Human; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24] (M2)
Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P10)
616C33H45NO10 16-O-Demethyl-deoxy AC* NAHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24] (M3)
604C32H45NO10 BACNARabbits; contents from small intestine and caecum and feces; ig, in vivo.IT[23] (M2)
Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c IT[25]
Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.d IT[26]
Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P1)
590C31H43NO10 16-O-Demethyl BACNARabbits; contents from small intestine and caecum and feces; ig, in vivo.IT[23] (M1)
588C32H45NO9 15-Deoxy BACNARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P2)
586C32H43NO9 Deacetoxy ACNARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]
660C35H49NO11 8-O-Propionyl BAC74, propionic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P8)
674C36H51NO11 8-O-Butyryl BAC88, butyric acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P9)
688C37H53NO11 8-O-Valeryl BAC102, valeric acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
700C38H53NO11 8-O-Hexenoyl BAC114, hexenoic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P7)
690C36H51NO12 8-O-(3-Hydroxy)-butyryl BACNARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P11)
702C38H55NO11 8-O-Hexanoyl BAC116, hexanoic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
716C39H57NO11 8-O-Heptanoyl BAC130, heptanoic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
722C40H51NO11 8-O-Phenylacetyl BAC136, phenylacetic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
728C40H57NO11 8-O-Octenoyl BACNARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation at pH 7.0, in vitro.IT[22] (P3)
736C41H53NO11 8-O-Phenylpropionyl BAC150, phenylpropionic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
800C45H69NO11 8-O-Tridecanoyl BAC214, tridecanoic acid Ibid.Ibid.Ibid.
814C46H71NO11 8-O-Tetradecanoyl BAC228, tetradecanoic acid Ibid.Ibid.Ibid.
828C47H73NO11 8-O-Pentadecanoyl BAC242, pentadecanoic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
842C48H75NO11 8-O-Palmitoyl BAC256, palmitic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
854C49H75NO11 8-O-Heptadecenoyl BAC268, heptadecenoic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
856C49H77NO11 8-O-(Methyl)-palmitoyl BAC270, methyl palmitic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
866C50H75NO11 8-O-Linoleyl BAC280, linoleic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
NARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]
868C50H77NO11 8-O-Oleoyl BAC282, oleic acidHuman; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR[24]
870C50H79NO11 8-O-Stearoyl BAC284, stearic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
882C51H79NO11 8-O-(9)-Nonadecenoyl BAC296, nonadeceneIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
886C50H79NO12 8-O-(3-Hydroxy)-stearoyl BAC 300, 3-hydroxy stearic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
954C56H91NO11 8-O-Tetracosanoyl BAC 368, tetracosanoic acid Ibid.Ibid.Ibid.
962C57H87NO11 8-O-Pentacosatrienoyl BAC376, pentacosatrienoic acidIbid.Ibid.Ibid.

MA590C31H43NO10 BMANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]
572C31H41NO9 Deacetoxy MANAIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
660C35H49NO11 8-O-Butyryl BMANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
674C36H51NO11 8-O-Valeryl BMANAIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
852C49H73NO11 8-O-Linoleyl BMANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]

HA574C31H43NO9 BHANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
Rats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]
556C31H41NO8 Deacetoxy HANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]
630C34H47NO10 8-O-Propionyl BHANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.e IT, MALDI source-FT-ICR[27]
644C35H49NO10 8-O-Butyryl BHANAIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
658C36H51NO10 8-O-Valeryl BHANAIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
692C39H49NO10 8-O-Phenylacetyl BHANAIbid.Ibid.Ibid.
836C49H73NO10 8-O-Linoleyl BHANARats; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.c,d IT[25, 26]

aNot available.

bDeoxy may also be referred to as dehydroxy in the literature.

cDDA was produced through decoction of Aconiti Radix Cocta with Fritillariae Thunbergii Bulbus, Pinelliae Rhizoma Preparatum, and Ampelopsis Radix.

It is not clear whether these compounds were directly metabolized from DDAs or were originally ingested.

dDDA was produced through decoction of Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata with Glycyrrhizae Radix and Rhizome as well as with Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma.

It is not clear whether these compounds were directly metabolized from DDAs or were originally ingested.

eIn addition to AC and HA monomers, DDAs were also generated from ethyl alcohol extraction ofRadix Aconiti.

It is not clear whether these compounds were directly metabolized from DDAs or were originally ingested.

*These metabolites were further biotransformed in the intestine. Metabolites of these intermediate products are listed in Table 4.

Table 4

Further biotransformation of intestinal AC metabolites in the intestine.

m/z (ESI+)FormulaIdentificationNeutral loss (Da), identification of fatty acidMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences
618C32H43NO11 1,16-Didemethyl AC (M1)NAa 16-O-Demethyl AC (C33H45NO11, 632) from AC; human; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR [28]
616C33H45NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy AC (M2)b NA
602C32H43NO10 1,16-Didemethyl-3-deoxy AC (M3)NA
590C31H43NO10 16-O-Demethyl BAC (M4)NA
486C24H39NO9 16-O-Demethyl aconine (M5)NA
646C34H47NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-propionyl BAC74, propionic acid
660C35H49NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-butyryl BAC88, butyric acid
674C36H51NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-valeryl BAC102, valeric acid
16-O-Demethyl-8-O-(methyl)-butyryl BAC102, methyl butyric acid
696C38H49NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-heptatrienoyl BAC124, heptatrienoic acid
698C38H51NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-heptadienoyl BAC126, heptadienoic acid
700C38H53NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-heptenoyl BAC128, heptenoic acid
702C38H55NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-heptanoyl BAC130, heptanoic acid
710C39H51NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-octatrienoyl BAC138, octatrienoic acid
716C39H57NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-octanoyl BAC144, octanoic acid
730C40H59NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-nonanoyl BAC158, nonanoic acid
736C41H53NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-decatetraenoyl BAC164, decatetraenoic acid
762C43H55NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-dodecapentaenoyl BAC190, dodecapentaenoic acid
764C43H57NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-dodecatetraenoyl BAC192, dodecatetraenoic acid
766C43H59NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-dodecatrienoyl BAC194, dodecatrienoic acid
778C44H59NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-tridecatetraenoyl BAC206, tridecatetraenoic acid
786C44H67NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-(methyl)-dodecanoyl BAC214, methyl dodecanoic acid
800C45H69NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-retradecanoyl BAC228, tetradecanoic acid
854C49H75NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-oleoyl BAC282, oleic acid
856C49H77NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-stearoyl BAC284, stearic acid
870C50H79NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-(methyl)-stearoyl BAC298, methyl stearic acid
884C51H81NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-arachidyl BAC312, arachidic acid
898C52H83NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-heneicosanoyl BAC326, heneicosanoic acid
926C54H87NO11 16-O-Demethyl-8-O-tricosanoyl BAC354, tricosanoic acid

616C33H45NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy AC (M1)NA3-Deoxy AC (C34H47NO10, 630) from AC; human; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR [29]
614C34H47NO9 1,13-Dideoxy AC (M2)NA
588C32H45NO9 3-Deoxy BAC (M3)NA
484C25H41NO8 3-Deoxy aconine (M4)NA
644C35H49NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-propionyl BAC74, propionic acid
658C36H51NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-butyryl BAC88, butyric acid
700C39H57NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-heptanoyl BAC130, heptanoic acid
702C38H55NO11 3-Deoxy-8-O-(2-methyl-3-hydroxy)-valeryl BAC132, 2-methyl-3-hydroxy valeric acid
714C40H59NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-octanoyl BAC144, octanoic acid
730C40H59NO11 3-Deoxy-8-O-(3-hydroxy)-octanoyl BAC160, 3-hydroxy octanoic acid
746C43H55NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-undecapentaenoyl BAC176, undecapentaenoic acid
762C44H59NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-dodecatetraenoyl BAC192, dodecatetraenoic acid
786C44H67NO11 3-Deoxy-8-O-(hydroxy)-dodecanoyl BAC216, hydroxy dodecanoic acid
800C45H69NO11 3-Deoxy-8-O-(hydroxy)-tridecanoyl BAC230, hydroxy tridecanoic acid
814C46H71NO11 3-Deoxy-8-O-(3-hydroxy)-tetradecanoyl BAC244, hydroxy tetradecanoic acid
828C47H73NO11 3-Deoxy-8-O-(hydroxy)-pentadecanoyl BAC258, hydroxy pentadecanoic acid
854C50H79NO10 3-Deoxy-8-O-propionyl BAC284, stearic acid

602C32H43NO10 1,16-O-Didemethyl-3-deoxy AC (M1)NA16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy AC (C33H45NO10, 616) from AC; human; intestinal bacteria; anaerobic incubation, in vitro.IT, FT-ICR [30]
600C33H45NO9 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-deoxy AC (M2)NA
574C31H43NO9 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy BAC (M3)NA
470C24H39NO8 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy aconine (M4)NA
630C34H47NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-propionyl BAC74, propionic acid
644C35H49NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-butyryl BAC88, butyric acid
696C39H53NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-octadienoyl BAC140, octadienoic acid
700C39H57NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-octanoyl BAC144, octanoic acid
702C38H55NO11 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-(hydroxy)-heptanoyl BAC146, hydroxy heptanoic acid
730C40H59NO11 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-(hydroxy)-nonanoyl BAC174, hydroxy nonanoic acid
746C43H55NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-dodecapentaenoyl BAC190, dodecapentaenoic acid
762C44H59NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-tridecatetraenoyl BAC206, tridecatetraenoic acid
778C45H63NO10 16-O-Demethyl-3-deoxy-8-O-tetradecatrienoyl BAC222, tetradecatrienoic acid

aNot available.

bDeoxy may also be referred to as dehydroxy in the literature.

Ester exchange metabolites are classified as lipoalkaloids or lipoaconitines with an acetyl group at the C-8 position of DDAs replaced by other fatty acid acyl groups [24, 31]. Presumably, the short chain fatty acids (such as propionic, butyric, hexanoic, phenylacetic, and phenylpropionic acids) for ester exchange are generated from xenobiotics, such as food decomposed by intestinal bacteria, while certain long chain fatty acids (such as palmitic, oleic, and stearic acids) are generated from bacterial cell walls [24]. DDA toxicity is reduced after ester exchange. For example, the LD50 of 8-O-butyryl- (from short chain fatty acid) benzoylmesaconine is 15.78 mg/kg, which is 5.5-fold greater than MA (8-O-acetyl-benzoylmesaconine) [22]. The LD50 for mice with lipomesaconitines (from long chain fatty acids) are from 10 to 40 mg/kg, which are 20-fold greater than MA [32].

2.3. Metabolism in the Liver

The liver is an important organ for drug metabolism, and it expresses many drug-metabolising enzymes. After oral administration, drugs are typically subjected to hepatic metabolism, including CEs that catalyse ester hydrolysis [18], phase I drug metabolic enzymes that catalyse oxidation, and phase II metabolic enzymes that catalyse conjugation [21]. The metabolites are hydrophilic and are more rapidly excreted from the body than parent drugs. Cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450s) and uridine 5′-diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are the most common phase I and phase II metabolic enzymes, respectively [33]. The hepatic metabolism studies reviewed herein were mainly performed in vitro through incubation with liver microsomes. CYP450- or UGT-catalysed metabolism in microsomes can be selectively performed in different reaction systems with auxiliary enzymes and exclusive substrates [34, 35]. The DDA and MDA phase I metabolic pathways are similar and include hydroxylation, deoxylation, demethylation, didemethylation/deethylation, dehydrogenation, and demethylation with dehydrogenation (Table 5). The individual CYP450s responsible for specific metabolites were further determined via individual inhibitors or recombinant isoenzymes. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 are the most common isoenzymes that catalyse both DDAs and MDAs. In addition, CYP2D6, CYP1A1/2, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, and CYP2E1 also partially catalyse DDAs.
Table 5

Metabolites of DDAs and MDAs converted in the liver.

Alkaloids m/z (ESI+)FormulaIdentification Involved CYP450sMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences
AC662C34H47NO12 Hydroxy ACCYP3A5, CYP2D6Human; liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s; incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[35] (M6)
NAa Rats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M5)
Guinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M6)
644C34H45NO11 3-Dehydrogen ACCYP3A4, CYP3A5Human; liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s; incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[35] (M5)
NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M5)
Dehydrogen ACCYP3A, CYP1A1/2 Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.IT[4] (M6)
NARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M7)
632C33H45NO11 16-O-Demethyl ACCYP3A, CYP1A1/2 Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.IT[4] (M2)
CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, CYP2C9Human; liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s; incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[35] (M2)
NARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M6)
NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M2)
O-Demethyl ACCYP3A, CYP1A1/2 Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.IT[4] (M1)
CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, CYP2D6Human; liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s; incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[35] (M1)
NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M1)
630C34H47NO10 Deoxyaconitine (3-deoxy AC)NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M7)
Deoxy ACNARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M8)
618C32H43NO11 O-Didemethyl ACCYP3A, CYP1A1/2 Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.IT[4] (M3)
CYP2D6, CYP3A5Human; liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s; incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[35] (M4)
NARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M4)
NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M3)
N-Deethyl ACCYP3A, CYP1A1/2Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.IT[4] (M4)
CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, CYP2C9Human; liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s; incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[35] (M3)
NARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. Q-TOF[38] (M4)
NARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M2)
NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M4)
604C32H45NO10 BACCYP3A, CYP1A1/2Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.IT[4] (M5)
NARats; liver microsome and S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.Q-Trap[39]
NARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. Q-TOF[38] (M2)
NARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M1)
NAGuinea pigs and mice; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro.HRMS, MS2 [37] (M8)
586C32H43NO9 Deacetoxy ACb NARats; liver microsome S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.IT[36] (M3)
482C25H39NO8 Dehydrated aconineNARabbits; liver; ig, in vivo. IT[40]

MA648C33H45NO12 Hydroxy MACYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M5)
2-Hydroxy MANARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. Q-TOF, QQQ[38] (M5)
CYP3A, CYP2C, CYP2DRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ; IM[42] (M5)
630C33H43NO11 Dehydrogen MACYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M4)
NARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. Q-TOF, QQQ[38] (M6)
3-Dehydrogen MACYP3A, CYP2DRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ; IM[42] (M2)
618C32H43NO11 16-O-Demethyl MA CYP2C8, CYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M2)
CYP3ARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ; IM[42] (M4)
1-O-Demethyl MACYP3A, CYP2CRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ; IM[42] (M3)
18-O-Demethyl MACYP3A, CYP2CRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ; IM[42] (M6)
Demethyl MACYP2C8, CYP2D6, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M1)
Demethyl MACYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M3)
616C32H41NO11 Demethyl-dehydrogen MACYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M6)
Demethyl-dehydrogen MACYP2C8, CYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M7, M8)
Demethyl-dehydrogen MACYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[41] (M9)
590C31H44NO10 BMANARats; liver microsome and S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.Q-Trap[39]
NARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. Q-TOF, QQQ[38] (M1)

HA632C33H45NO11 MACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M8)
CYP3A, CYP2D, CYP2C, CYP2E1Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M6)
2-Hydroxy HACYP3A, CYP2C, CYP2D, CYP1A2Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M4)
Hydroxy HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M7)
614C33H43NO10 15-Dehydrogen HACYP3A, CYP2D, CYP2E1Rats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M2)
602C32H43NO10 16-O-Demethyl HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M2)
1-O-Demethyl HACYP3A, CYP2D, CYP2CRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M5)
18-O-Demethyl HACYP3A, CYP2CRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M7)
Demethyl HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M1)
Demethyl HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M3)
600C32H41NO10 Demethyl-dehydrogen HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M4–M6)
590C31H43NO10 2-Hydroxy BHACYP3A, CYP2CRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M1)
588C31H41NO10 Didemethyl HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M9, M10)
Didemethyl HACYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C19Human (male); liver microsomes and recombinant CYP450s;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF[43] (M11)
574C31H43NO9 BHACYP3A, CYP2DRats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. QQQ[44] (M3)
NARats; liver microsomes; incubation, in vitro. Q-TOF, QQQ[38] (M3)
NARats; liver microsome and S9 fraction; incubation, in vitro.Q-Trap[39]

BAC602C32H43NO10 Dehydrogen BAC (M1, M2)CYP3A4, CYP3A5Human; liver microsomes;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF [45]
590C31H43NO10 Demethyl BAC (M5)CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6
Demethyl BAC (M6)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
588C31H41NO10 Demethyl-dehydrogen BAC (M3)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
576C30H41NO10 Deethyl BAC ordidemethyl BAC (M7)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
574C30H39NO10 Didemethyl-dehydrogen BAC ordeethyl-dehydrogen BAC (M4)CYP3A4, CYP3A5

BMA606C31H43NO11 Hydroxy BMA (M8)CYP3A4, CYP3A5Human; liver microsomes;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF [45]
588C31H41NO10 Dehydrogen BMA (M1, M2)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
576C30H41NO10 Demethyl BMA (M5)CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, CYP2C8
Demethyl BMA (M6, M7)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
574C30H39NO10 Demethyl-dehydrogen BMA (M3, M4)CYP3A4, CYP3A5

BHA590C31H43NO10 Hydroxy BHA (M7)CYP3A4, CYP3A5Human; liver microsomes;incubation, in vitro.Q-TOF [45]
BMA (M8)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
572C31H41NO9 Dehydrogen BHA (M1, M2)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
560C30H41NO9 Demethyl BHA (M5)CYP3A4
Demethyl BHA (M4, M6)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
558C30H39NO9 Demethyl-dehydrogen BHA (M3)CYP3A4, CYP3A5
556C30H37NO9 Demethyl-didehydrogen BHA (M9)CYP3A4, CYP3A5

aNot available.

bDeacetoxy aconitine may also be referred to as pyroaconitine in the literature.

Hydrophobic drug biotransformation commonly occurs first through phase I metabolism in which functional groups, such as hydroxy, sulfhydryl, carboxyl, and amino group, are formed and provide reaction sites for the subsequent phase II conjugation [46, 47]. For lipophilic DDAs and MDAs, hydroxy groups are initially present and are formed after hydroxylation during the phase I metabolism. However, phase II metabolites of either DDAs or MDAs were not detected in hepatic metabolism in vitro and in vivo, which demonstrates that phase II metabolism is not dominant compared with phase I metabolism in the liver. DDA ester hydrolysis should be catalysed by CEs. However, CYP3A, CYP1A1, and CYP1A2 are also involved in ester hydrolysis of AC, which reflects the complexity of metabolism.

2.4. A Comparison of DDA and MDA Metabolism in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Liver

The metabolites generated in the stomach, intestine, and liver are compared in Table 6. The polarity of most metabolites increased after DDA gastrointestinal and hepatic metabolism, except lipoalkaloids. Metabolites of AC from dehydrogenation and demethylation with dehydrogenation were only observed in the liver. The AC metabolites from demethylation with deoxylation observed from intestinal bacteria incubation [24] were also detected in the urine after oral AC administration in rabbits. However, these metabolites were not found in the urine after intravenous injection [48]. This observation suggests that the gastrointestinal tract may participate in biotransformation. The characteristic metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract were lipoalkaloids, which might be converted by enzymes that are only produced by intestinal bacteria. In addition, more lipoalkaloid varieties were detected in the intestine than in the stomach, which is consistent with abundant bacterial distribution in the gastrointestinal tract [16]. More studies have focused on DDAs than MDAs. However, it is speculated that MDAs may share similar metabolic pathways (except for ester hydrolysis at the C-8 position) with DDAs in the gastrointestinal tract based on the similarity in their hepatic metabolism and chemical structures.
Table 6

A comparison of DDA and MDA metabolites in different metabolic procedures.

AlkaloidsStomachIntestineLiver (CYP450s, phase I metabolism)
DDAsEster hydrolysisEster hydrolysis commonly occurs at C-8Ester hydrolysis commonly occurs at C-8
Hydroxylation at 2′/3′/4′ of the benzoyl groupHydroxylation at C-10Hydroxylation at C-2
Deoxylation at C-3/15Deoxylation at C-3/15Deoxylation at C-3/15
Demethylation at the methoxy groupDemethylation at the methoxy group, often at C-1/6/16 or the N-methyl groupDemethylation at the methoxy group, often at C-1/6/16 or the N-methyl group
Didemethylation at the methoxy group or deethylation at the N-ethyl groupNAa Didemethylation at the methoxy group or deethylation at the N-ethyl group
NADeacetoxylation (pyrolysis)Deacetoxylation (pyrolysis)
NANADehydrogenation at C-3/15
NANADemethylation at C-1/6/16 or the N-methyl group with dehydrogenation at C-3/15;demethylation with dehydrogenation at the same methoxyl group, O remained as a carbonyl group.
NADemethylation and deoxylationNA
Lipoalkaloids via ester exchange at C-8 with long chain fatty acids.Lipoalkaloids via ester exchange at C-8 with short/long chain fatty acids.NA

MDAsNANAHydroxylation
Demethylation
Didemethylation or deethylation
Dehydrogenation
Demethylation and (di)dehydrogenation

aNot available.

Interestingly, phase I metabolites of hydroxylation, deoxylation, demethylation, and didemethylation/deethylation were detected not only in the liver but also in the gastrointestinal tract. As mentioned above in Section 2.2, intestinal bacteria participate in metabolism, such as through deoxylation, reduction, and deacetylation. However, it has also been reported that human small intestinal epithelial cells express a range of P450s, which include CYP3A, the isoenzyme that dominates in the liver [49]. Intestinal metabolism was performed in vitro through anaerobic incubation in a feces suspension, despite the symbiotic intestinal bacteria, which should also contain apoptosis-undergoing intestinal epithelial cells that release phase I and phase II metabolic enzymes into the suspension. Thus, intestinal metabolites are likely converted by both bacteria and phase I metabolic enzymes. Metabolic isoenzyme expression is not identical among different species [50] that lead to metabolic differences in different species. Based on references in this review, we find that DDAs were ester hydrolysed to MDAs in rat intestine and liver, but not in humans. On the other hand, the same metabolites converted in different species have been reported. For example, 16-O-demethyl BAC, the ester hydrolysed products from 16-O-demethyl AC in intestinal metabolism, was detected not only in rats but also in humans. Hydroxy aconitine from AC was detected through incubation in liver microsomes or S9 from humans, rats, guinea pigs, and mice. It is notable that the AC demethylation at the C-16 position is catalysed by CYP3A and CYP1A1/2 in rats while it is catalysed by CYP3A, CYP2D6, and CYP2C9 in humans. However, no studies have specifically compared metabolites from DDAs or MDAs among humans and different experimental animals. Briefly, the metabolic differences in different species yield certain risks in predicting human drug metabolism based on data from experimental animals. The metabolic pathways proposed for DDAs are generalized in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Proposed DDA metabolic pathways. The organ/tissue metabolic processes are partially indicated. The wavy bonds indicate the potential metabolic positions. Me, Et, Ac, and Bz indicate methyl, ethyl, acetyl, and benzoyl groups, respectively.

The organ/tissue metabolic processes are partially indicated. The wavy bonds indicate the potential metabolic positions. Me, Et, Ac, and Bz indicate methyl, ethyl, acetyl, and benzoyl groups, respectively.

3. Metabolites Detected in the Blood

MDAs and alcohol amines are the main DDA metabolites in the blood (Table 7). It has been suggested that AC and related alkaloids can be rapidly absorbed by the upper gastrointestinal tract for the short latent period between the ingestion of aconite roots and the onset of poisoning features [3]. Therefore, the absorbed DDAs may be partially and gradually ester hydrolysed to less toxic MDAs and nontoxic alcohol amines by CEs distributed in the blood. Furthermore, the blood provides a suitable pH environment for ester hydrolysis. This hypothesis is supported by an analysis of rat plasma after DDA administration via a tail vein, wherein MDAs and alcohol amines were detected [39].
Table 7

DDA metabolites detected in the plasma.

DDAs m/z (ESI+)FormulaIdentificationMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences
AC604C32H45NO10 BACMouse; plasma; ig, in vivo.GC/MS[51]
Rabbit; plasma; ig, in vivo.IT[52] (M2)
590C31H43NO10 16-O-Demethyl BACRabbit; plasma; ig, in vivo.IT[52] (M3)
500C25H41NO9 AconineRats; plasma; iv, in vivo.a Q-Trap[39]
Mouse; plasma; ig, in vivo.GC/MS[51]
Rabbit; plasma; ig, in vivo.IT[52] (M4)

MA590C31H43NO10 BMARats; plasma; iv, in vivo.a Q-Trap [39]
486C24H40NO9 Mesaconine

HA574C31H44NO9 BHARats; plasma; iv, in vivo.a Q-Trap[39]

aA mixture of AC, MA, and HA was administered via the tail vein.

MDAs and alcohol amines are commonly considered markers in forensic and clinical evaluations of aconitine poisoning because their half-lives are longer than DDAs [19], which might lead to the neglect of other metabolites in the blood. Additionally, many efflux/influx transporters, such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2), and MRP3 expressed in intestinal epithelial and hepatic cells, are involved in drug absorption [53]. It is difficult to determine whether the various metabolites produced in the gastrointestinal tract and liver are transported into the blood from the few studies on their transport mechanism.

4. Metabolites Detected in the Urine

The metabolites found in the urine are shown in Table 8. Compared with intestinal and hepatic metabolites, most metabolites from hydroxylation, deoxylation, demethylation, deethylation/didemethylation, dehydrogenation, ester hydrolysis, deacetoxylation (pyrolysis), and demethylation with deoxylation have been found in the urine. Further, a few phase II metabolites as glucuronide and sulfate conjugates have been found in the urine but have not been reported in hepatic or intestinal metabolism in vitro. Glucuronidation catalysed by UGTs occurs in human and rat kidneys [63, 64]; glucuronidation might be responsible for phase II biotransformation processes in addition to hepatic and intestinal metabolism.
Table 8

Metabolites of AC, MA, and HA (DDAs) detected in the urine.

DDAs m/z (ESI+)FormulaIdentificationMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences

AC780C38H53NO16 BAC glucuronide conjugateRats; ig, in vivo.IT [54]
726C34H47NO14SAC sulfate conjugate
662C34H47NO12 10-Hydroxy ACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[36] (M5)
644C34H45NO11 3-Dehydrogen ACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[36] (M7)
632C33H45NO11 16-O-Demethyl ACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[55] (M2)
Rabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[56] (M1)
Rabbits; iv and ig, in vivo.IT[48] (M1, found in both iv and ig)
Rabbits (male and female); ig, in vivo.IT[57] (M5)
Human (female); po, in vivo.a IT[58] (M4)
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[36] (M6)
Rabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[59] (M1)
Human (female); po, in vivo.b IT[60] (M7)
1-O-Demethyl ACRats; ig, in vivo.IT [54]
6-O-Demethyl AC
MARats; ig, in vivo.IT[55] (M1)
630C34H47NO10 Deoxy ACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[36] (M8)
618C32H43NO11 16-O-Demethyl MARats; ig, in vivo.IT[55] (M3)
8-Methoxy BACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
1-O-Demethyl MARats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
N-Deethyl AC (M2)Rats; ig, in vivo.IT [36]
O-Didemethyl AC (M4)
616C33H45NO10 1-O-Demethyl-13-deoxy ACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
Demethyl-deoxy ACRabbits; iv and ig, in vivo.IT[48] (M2, found in ig only)
606C31H43NO11 10-Hydroxy BMARats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
604C32H45NO10 BACRabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[56] (M2)
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[55] (M4)
Rabbits (male and female); ig, in vivo.IT[57] (M2)
Rabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[59] (M2)
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
Human (female); po, in vivo.a IT[58] (M1)
Human (female); po, in vivo.b IT[60] (M4)
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[36] (M1)
590C31H43NO10 16-O-Demethyl BACRabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[56] (M3)
Rabbits (male and female); ig, in vivo.IT[57] (M3)
Rabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[59] (M3)
588C32H45NO9 3-Deoxy BACRats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
586C32H43NO9 Pyroaconitine (deacetoxy AC)Rabbits (male and female); ig, in vivo.IT[57] (M6, found in male only)
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[36] (M3)
500C25H41NO9 AconineRabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[56] (M4)
Rabbits (male and female); ig, in vivo.IT[57] (M4)
Rabbits; ig, in vivo.IT[59] (M4)
Rats; ig, in vivo.IT[54]
482C25H39NO8 Dehydrated aconineHuman; po, in vivo.c IT[40]

Alkaloids m/z (ESI+)FormulaIdentificationMetabolic procedureMS detectionReferences

MA766C37H51NO16 BMA glucuronide conjugateRats; ig, in vivo.IT[61] (M1)
648C33H45NO12 10-Hydroxy MARats; ig, in vivo.IT[61] (M2)
618C32H43NO11 1-O-Demethyl MARats; ig, in vivo.IT[61] (M3)
Demethyl MARats; ig, in vivo.d TOF[62] (M10)
616C33H45NO10 Deoxy MARats; ig, in vivo.IT[61] (M4)
590C31H43NO10 BMARats; ig, in vivo.IT[61] (M5)
Human (female); po, in vivo.a IT[58] (M2)
Human (female); po, in vivo.b IT[60] (M5)
468C24H37NO8 Dehydrated mesaconineHuman; po, in vivo.c IT[40]

HA602C32H43NO10 16-O-Demethyl HAHuman (female); po, in vivo.a IT[58] (M5)
Human (female); po, in vivo.b IT[60] (M8)
574C31H43NO9 BHAHuman (female); po, in vivo.a IT[58] (M3)
Human (female); po, in vivo.b IT[60] (M6)

a,bDDA was produced through decoction containing Aconiti and Aconiti Kusnezoffii Radix.

It is not clear whether these compounds were directly metabolized from DDAs or originally ingested.

cDDA was produced from a medical liquor containing Aconiti Kusnezoffii Radix.

It is not clear whether these compounds were directly metabolized from DDAs or originally ingested.

dDDA was produced from a liquid of crude aconite root decoction via ethanol precipitation.

It is not clear whether these compounds were directly metabolized from DDAs or originally ingested.

Additionally, mRNA for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, which are the major isoforms that catalyse DDA metabolism, is also expressed in human kidneys, but the expression levels are much lower than in the liver and intestine [65]. Based on the data in Section 3, metabolites from DDAs in the blood are fewer than in the urine. Further, the urine is converted from the blood in the kidney. Perhaps, the various metabolites in the urine are converted from DDAs and their ester hydrolysed products in the blood by metabolic enzymes expressed at low levels in the kidney. Is it possible that various metabolites from DDAs produced in the intestine and liver are absorbed in the blood and excreted in the urine? However, as noted in Section 3, the data on metabolites in the blood is insufficient. No studies have reported on metabolites of lipoalkaloids in the urine, which are the metabolites characteristically produced in the gastrointestinal tract. DDA lipophilicity may be reasonably increased through ester exchange with long chain fatty acids at the C-8 position, which results in easier absorption of lipoalkaloids into the blood. Are the ester groups then hydrolysed by CEs in the blood and liver, producing MDAs and alcohol amines, or are they directly excreted through the feces? Such conjecture requires further investigation.

5. Original Compound Stability

All of the in vivo and in vitro metabolism reactions occur in fluid. Therefore, the stability of DDAs and MDAs in different pH aqueous solutions should be considered. One study reported that AC and MA were decomposed dramatically after incubation in water for 24 h at 25°C (degrees Celsius), and the products of AC were BAC, aconine, deacetoxy AC, and deoxy AC. In addition, almost half of the AC and MA were depleted in phosphate buffer at pH 2.0 and 6.8 over 12 h at 25°C (degrees Celsius); these pH values are similar to gastric acid and intestinal juice, respectively [66]. These results imply that metabolites, such as BAC and aconine, may be partially converted from DDAs in body fluid without enzyme catalysis. On the other hand, the rate of MDA formation from DDAs was much higher in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with hepatic microsomes than in the negative control without hepatic microsomes [39]. The facts imply that the enzymes did affect bioconversion of instable DDAs.

6. Metabolite Detection and Identification

Metabolites are typically varied at trace levels with endogenous interference from biological matrices, such as tissue, the blood, or urine. Liquid chromatography multiple-stage tandem mass spectrum (LC/MS) has been widely applied for drug metabolite detection due to its high sensitivity and selectively. For DDAs and MDAs, positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) is suitable for alkaloid ionization. Quadrupole time of flight (Q-TOF) and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) MS techniques are applied to metabolite identification due to their high resolution of pseudomolecular ions. Fragment ions are obtained step-by-step through ion trap (IT) MS, which is helpful for deducing the chemical structures. The acyl groups from fatty acids are confirmed by GC-MS, and neutral fatty acid losses are observed in LC-MS [24]. The fragmentation pathways of different types of Aconitum alkaloids include diagnostic ions. For the AC-type of alkaloid, the diagnostic ions are [M+H-18 (water)]+, [M+H-60 (acetate from C-8 and C-15)]+, [M+H-60-32 (methanol)-28 (carbonyl group)]+, and [M+H-60-32-28-122 (benzoic acid at C-14)]+[14, 22]. For the BAC-type, the diagnostic ions are [M+H-50 (methanol and water)]+, [M+H-50-32]+, and [M+H-50-32-18]+ [60]. For lipoaconitine, the diagnostic ions are 586 ([Mass of AC+H-60]+) with neutral fatty acid losses that correspond to acyl groups at the C-8 position [24]. However, MS analyses only provide a possible fragmentation pattern based on the mass difference between pseudomolecular and fragment ions, and the metabolite confirmations are not necessarily accurate. Considering HA, the demethylation reaction position is ambiguous due to the five methyl groups at the C-1, C-6, C-16, C-18, and nitro positions. Demethylation with dehydrogenation was inferred to occur at the methoxy and hydroxy groups that attach to different skeleton carbons in MA [41] (see Figure 1), while it occurs at the same methoxy group in HA, forming a carbonyl group [43] (see Figure 1). However, detailed structure determination for these two types of metabolites was not provided.

7. Conclusions

In this review, we classify and summarize metabolites of highly toxic DDAs and less toxic MDAs from the gastric and intestinal content, intestinal bacterial juice, hepatic microsomes, blood, and urine from different animal species and humans in vivo and in vitro. For example, considering AC, which is the most researched toxic DDA, we generalize a process of toxicity reduction in body after oral AC administration for the first time (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The proposed process of toxicity reduction after oral AC administration in humans and experimental animals. The metabolites from ester exchange are lipo-alkaloids. Ester hydrolysis occurs at the C-8 or/and C-14 position, producing benzoylaconine (BAC) and aconine. Phase I metabolism refers to hydroxylation, deoxylation, dehydrogenation, demethylation, and didemethylation/deethylation. A few phase II metabolites were detected in the urine, including BAC glucuronide and AC sulfate conjugates. Cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450s), carboxylesterases (CEs), and enzymes produced by intestinal bacteria are involved in gastrointestinal and hepatic metabolism of aconitine (AC).

The metabolites from ester exchange are lipoalkaloids. Ester hydrolysis occurs at the C-8 or/and C-14 position, producing benzoylaconine (BAC) and aconine. Phase I metabolism refers to hydroxylation, deoxylation, dehydrogenation, demethylation, and didemethylation/deethylation. A few phase II metabolites were detected in the urine, including BAC glucuronide and AC sulfate conjugates. Cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450s), carboxylesterases (CEs), and enzymes produced by intestinal bacteria are involved in gastrointestinal and hepatic metabolism of aconitine (AC). In conclusion, CYP450s, CEs, and enzymes produced by intestinal bacteria are mainly involved in DDA metabolism in both the gastrointestinal tract and liver after oral administration, including hydroxylation, deoxylation, demethylation, dehydrogen, pyrolysis, ester hydrolysis, and ester exchange. Phase II conjugation of DDAs is not the dominant metabolic process and only a few conjugated DDAs are found in the urine. DDA metabolites in the blood are not as various as those in the urine. Thus far, reports of less toxic MDA metabolism have only been related to hepatic metabolism. Nevertheless, MDAs may share similar metabolic pathways (except ester hydrolysis at the C-8 position) with DDAs in the gastrointestinal tract based on the same DDA and MDA diterpenoid skeletons and similar hepatic metabolism between DDAs and MDAs. As summarized above, toxic DDAs and MDAs are converted to metabolites that are less toxic or easier to excrete in the gastrointestinal tract and liver after oral administration. However, for drug excretion, few phase II metabolism conjugations are formed, which are the most hydrosoluble metabolites. Further, this detoxification effect is likely restricted due to rapid DDA absorption by the upper gastrointestinal tract. Although the many available studies on metabolism and toxicity of DDAs and MDAs are helpful, they are insufficient for safe clinical administration of Aconitum herbs. Several issues must be further studied and verified. More attention should be paid to metabolism of MDAs because they are not sufficiently safe for clinical use. Due to metabolic interspecific differences, it is more reasonable to apply human recombinant metabolic isozymes or humanized animal models [67] to a human metabolism study. Studies have not confirmed whether the various metabolites detected in the urine are from gastrointestinal and hepatic metabolism via absorption into the blood or from biotransformation in the kidney. Because the metabolites are detected at trace levels, it is difficult to accumulate such metabolites for identification, bioassays, or toxicity studies. However, the changes in bioactivity or toxicity after metabolism are unambiguous. Based on our conclusions, it is worthwhile to perform an in-depth investigation of the Aconitum herbs compatible with other medicines, such as prescription licorice, which is featured in and crucial to clinical application of Aconitum herbs in traditional Chinese medicine. To a certain extent, drug-drug interactions are the essence of a drug-drug combination, in which drug metabolism and/or absorption is changed by affecting (inducing or inhibiting) another with respect to metabolic enzymes or/and transporters; thus, drug pharmacological activity or toxicity is consequently affected [12, 13, 67].
  38 in total

Review 1.  Functions and transcriptional regulation of adult human hepatic UDP-glucuronosyl-transferases (UGTs): mechanisms responsible for interindividual variation of UGT levels.

Authors:  Karl Walter Bock
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Aconite poisoning presenting as hypotension and bradycardia.

Authors:  Thomas Y K Chan
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Simultaneous determination of 11 aconitum alkaloids in human serum and urine using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Usui; Yoshie Hayashizaki; Masaki Hashiyada; Anri Nakano; Masato Funayama
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.376

4.  Effects of long-term administrations of aconitine on electrocardiogram and tissue concentrations of aconitine and its metabolites in mice.

Authors:  Kentaro Wada; Makoto Nihira; Hideyuki Hayakawa; Yukari Tomita; Makiko Hayashida; Youkichi Ohno
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Stereoselective disposition of flurbiprofen from a mutual prodrug with a histamine H2-antagonist to reduce gastrointestinal lesions in the rat.

Authors:  A Fukuhara; T Imai; M Otagiri
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.437

6.  Glucuronidation patterns of common urinary and serum monoester phthalate metabolites.

Authors:  Manori J Silva; Dana B Barr; John A Reidy; Kayoko Kato; Nicole A Malek; Carolyn C Hodge; Donald Hurtz; Antonia M Calafat; Larry L Needham; John W Brock
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Studies on the stability of diester-diterpenoid alkaloids from the genus Aconitum L. by high performance liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI/MSn).

Authors:  Hao Yue; Zi-Feng Pi; Hui-Lin Li; Feng-Rui Song; Zhi-Qiang Liu; Shu-Ying Liu
Journal:  Phytochem Anal       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.373

8.  Metabolite profile analysis of aconitine in rabbit stomach after oral administration by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization/multiple-stage tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zhigang Sui; Na Li; Zhiqiang Liu; Jun Yan; Zhongying Liu
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.908

Review 9.  Genetically humanized mouse models of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters and their applications.

Authors:  Nico Scheer; C Roland Wolf
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 1.908

10.  Monoester-Diterpene Aconitum Alkaloid Metabolism in Human Liver Microsomes: Predominant Role of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5.

Authors:  Ling Ye; Xiao-Shan Yang; Lin-Lin Lu; Wei-Ying Chen; Shan Zeng; Tong-Meng Yan; Ling-Na Dong; Xiao-Juan Peng; Jian Shi; Zhong-Qiu Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Effects of Rheum palmatum L. on the Pharmacokinetic of Major Diterpene Alkaloids of Aconitum carmichaelii Debx. in Rats.

Authors:  Yan Li; Yun-Xia Li; Meng-Jie Zhao; An Yuan; Xiao-Hong Gong; Meng-Jun Zhao; Cheng Peng
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Hydroxylation Metabolisms of Crassicauline A in Rats Under Toxic Dose.

Authors:  Xue Fan; Shan-Shan Yin; Xue-Jing Li; Kui Yang; Liang Xu; Ke Lan
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Cytotoxic Effects of Mesaconitine, the Aconitum carmichaelii Debx Bioactive Compound, on HBEC-5i Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells: Role of Ca2+ Signaling-Mediated Pathway.

Authors:  Shu-Shong Hsu; Wei-Zhe Liang
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Ester Hydrolysis Differentially Reduces Aconitine-Induced Anti-hypersensitivity and Acute Neurotoxicity: Involvement of Spinal Microglial Dynorphin Expression and Implications for Aconitum Processing.

Authors:  Teng-Fei Li; Nian Gong; Yong-Xiang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Relationships between the Toxicities of Radix Aconiti Lateralis Preparata (Fuzi) and the Toxicokinetics of Its Main Diester-Diterpenoid Alkaloids.

Authors:  Mengbi Yang; Xiaoyu Ji; Zhong Zuo
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Comparison of analgesic activities of aconitine in different mice pain models.

Authors:  Jianhua Deng; Jiada Han; Jiahao Chen; Yanmin Zhang; Qiuju Huang; Ying Wang; Xiaoxiao Qi; Zhongqiu Liu; Elaine Lai-Han Leung; Dawei Wang; Qian Feng; Linlin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Retracted Article: A high-throughput metabolomics strategy for discovering the influence of differential metabolites and metabolic pathways of huaxian capsules on sepsis-associated Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome.

Authors:  Qun Liang; Han Liu; Xiu-Li Li; Pei-Yang Sun; Yang Yang; Chunpeng Du
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 8.  Potential roles of gut microbes in biotransformation of natural products: An overview.

Authors:  Yucui Zhao; Xinqin Zhong; Junyuan Yan; Congying Sun; Xin Zhao; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis Is a Low-Grade Inflammatory Disease: Obesity's Involvement and Herbal Treatment.

Authors:  Mustapha Zeddou
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Targeting gut microbiota for precision medicine: Focusing on the efficacy and toxicity of drugs.

Authors:  Wuwen Feng; Juan Liu; Hui Ao; Shijun Yue; Cheng Peng
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 11.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.