Literature DB >> 25705052

Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety.

Erika J Wolf1, Kelly M Harrington1, Shaunna L Clark2, Mark W Miller1.   

Abstract

Determining sample size requirements for structural equation modeling (SEM) is a challenge often faced by investigators, peer reviewers, and grant writers. Recent years have seen a large increase in SEMs in the behavioral science literature, but consideration of sample size requirements for applied SEMs often relies on outdated rules-of-thumb. This study used Monte Carlo data simulation techniques to evaluate sample size requirements for common applied SEMs. Across a series of simulations, we systematically varied key model properties, including number of indicators and factors, magnitude of factor loadings and path coefficients, and amount of missing data. We investigated how changes in these parameters affected sample size requirements with respect to statistical power, bias in the parameter estimates, and overall solution propriety. Results revealed a range of sample size requirements (i.e., from 30 to 460 cases), meaningful patterns of association between parameters and sample size, and highlight the limitations of commonly cited rules-of-thumb. The broad "lessons learned" for determining SEM sample size requirements are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; bias; confirmatory factor analysis; sample size; solution propriety; statistical power; structural equation modeling

Year:  2013        PMID: 25705052      PMCID: PMC4334479          DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  5 in total

1.  The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.

Authors:  C K Enders
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling.

Authors:  David A Cole; Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2003-11

3.  Sample size for multiple regression: obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant.

Authors:  Ken Kelley; Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-09

4.  The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

Review 5.  Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell; Ken Kelley; Joseph R Rausch
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

  5 in total
  278 in total

1.  Type 2 Diabetes Self-management Among Spanish-Speaking Hispanic Immigrants.

Authors:  Cheryl A Smith-Miller; Diane C Berry; Darren DeWalt; Cass T Miller
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-12

2.  Success in School for Justice-Involved Girls: Do Specific Aspects of Developmental Immaturity Matter?

Authors:  Emily Haney-Caron; Naomi E S Goldstein; Christy L Giallella; Kathleen Kemp; Christina Riggs Romaine
Journal:  Int J Forensic Ment Health       Date:  2016-03-17

3.  Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Coercion: Measurement Invariance in a Population-Based Sample of Male and Female High School Students.

Authors:  Julianna M Nemeth; Nelie Viveiros; Kellie R Lynch; Tia Stevens Anderson; Bonnie Fisher
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  A data mining and item response mixture modeling method to retrospectively measure Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the 1970 British Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joanne Cotton; Sara T Baker
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Fitting Large Factor Analysis Models With Ordinal Data.

Authors:  Christine DiStefano; Heather L McDaniel; Liyun Zhang; Dexin Shi; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Psychological threat avoidance as a barrier to HIV testing in gay/bisexual men.

Authors:  Devon M Price; Jennifer L Howell; Amanda N Gesselman; Stephanie Finneran; Diane M Quinn; Lisa A Eaton
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-01-01

7.  Structural Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Pearlin Mastery Scale in Spanish-Speaking Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Janna R Gordon; Vanessa L Malcarne; Scott C Roesch; Richard G Roetzheim; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Identifying Mechanisms of Behavior Change in Psychosocial Alcohol Treatment Trials: Improving the Quality of Evidence from Mediational Analyses.

Authors:  John W Finney
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Caregiver Burden Inventory in Children and Adolescents With PANS.

Authors:  Cristan Farmer; Margo Thienemann; Collin Leibold; Gabrielle Kamalani; Bethany Sauls; Jennifer Frankovich
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

10.  The effect of disgust-related side-effects on symptoms of depression and anxiety in people treated for cancer: a moderated mediation model.

Authors:  Philip A Powell; Haffiezhah A Azlan; Jane Simpson; Paul G Overton
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.