Literature DB >> 25704589

Nonvascular Interventional Procedures in an Urban General Hospital: Analysis of 2001-2010 with Comparison to the Previous Decade.

Peter F Hahn1, Alexander R Guimaraes2, Ronald S Arellano2, Peter R Mueller2, Debra A Gervais2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To determine trends in nonvascular image-guided procedures at an urban general hospital over a 10-year period and to compare utilization of nonvascular interventional radiology (IR) over the decade 2001-2010 to a previously reported analysis for 1991-2000.
METHODS: With institutional review board approval, a 20-year quality assurance database verified against the radiology information system was queried for procedure location (eg, pleura, liver, bowel, and abdomen) and type (eg, biopsy, catheter insertion, and transient drainage), demographics, and change over time. Yearly admissions and new hospital numbers assigned each year served to normalize for overall hospital activity.
RESULTS: A total of 50,195 IR procedures were performed in 24,309 distinct patients (male:female, 12,625:11,684; average age, 60 years), 940 procedures performed in age <20 years, and 571 procedures performed in patients aged ≥90 years. A total of 15345, 4377, and 1754 patients had one, two, or three procedures, respectively; 470 had ≥10 procedures. Twenty-seven supervising radiologists and 277 individuals participated as operators, double the previous decade. Biopsy (4.8% average yearly increase), abdominal drainage (7.3%), paracentesis (12.9%), tube manipulation (13.0%), suprapubic bladder tube insertion (21.0%), and gastrostomy (44.6%) all increased strongly (P < .001) over 120 months but not biliary drainage, nephrostomy, or chest tubes. Procedures increased faster than either admissions or new hospital numbers (P < .001). For each 1000 new hospital numbers, IR service performed 48 procedures versus 31 the previous decade (P < .0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Referrals for nonvascular IR procedures have doubled over 2 decades, outpacing growth in new hospital patients and requiring increased resource allocation.
Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiology; abdominal abscess; image-guided biopsy; interventional; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25704589     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

1.  Challenges of practicing neuro-endovascular interventions in a resource-limited country; Ghana in focus.

Authors:  Benjamin Dabo Sarkodie; Bashiru Babatunde Jimah; Asare Kwaku Offei; Bernard Botwe; Dorothea Anim; Yaw Boateng Mensah; Edmund Kwakye Brakohiapa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.830

2.  T2 relaxation time is related to liver fibrosis severity.

Authors:  Alexander R Guimaraes; Luiz Siqueira; Ritika Uppal; Jamu Alford; Bryan C Fuchs; Suguru Yamada; Kenneth Tanabe; Raymond T Chung; Gregory Lauwers; Michael L Chew; Giles W Boland; Duhyant V Sahani; Mark Vangel; Peter F Hahn; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

3.  The future of interventional and neurointerventional radiology: learning lessons from the past.

Authors:  Julian Maingard; Hong Kuan Kok; Dinesh Ranatunga; Duncan Mark Brooks; Ronil V Chandra; Michael J Lee; Hamed Asadi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Guayule Natural Rubber Latex and Bi2O3 Films for X-ray Attenuating Medical Gloves.

Authors:  David A Ramirez Cadavid; Rick R Layman; Thomas Nishino; J Lauren Slutzky; Zhenyu Li; Katrina Cornish
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.