Yoshikuni Kawaguchi1, David Fuks2, Takeo Nomi3, Hughes Levard3, Brice Gayet4. 1. Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et Robotique (ISIR), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. 3. Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France. 4. Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et Robotique (ISIR), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Electronic address: brice.gayet@imm.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has increasingly gained popularity, there are only a few reports mentioning application and outcomes of LDP for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. The aim of our study is to demonstrate technical details of LDP employing radical en bloc procedure (en bloc LDP) and to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of en bloc LDP applied for adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We evaluated 23 consecutive patients who underwent LDP for adenocarcinoma in the body or tail of the pancreas. Our concepts of en bloc LDP for adenocarcinoma comprise 3 principles: en bloc removal of retroperitoneal structures, lymph node (LN) dissection, and preservation of the spleen. RESULTS: En bloc LDP without splenectomy was performed in 17 patients (74%) and en bloc LDP with splenectomy was in 6 patients (26%). Mean ± standard deviation operation time was 203 ± 54 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 208 ± 264 mL. Conversion to open distal pancreatectomy was required in 1 patient (4%) owing to the severe adhesions around the pancreas. The overall morbidity rate following en bloc LDP was 47% (n = 11), and the rate of pancreatic fistula was 39% (n = 9). There were no 30-day or in-hospital mortalities. Mean tumor size was 32 ± 12 mm, and mean number of harvested LNs was 19.8 ± 9.3. No patient had positive margins on final histologic diagnosis. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 67%, 49%, and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSION: En bloc LDP can be applied safely by the surgeon with advanced experience in minimally invasive surgery with satisfactory short- and long-term outcomes, supporting further application of LDP for adenocarcinoma with advances in operative techniques and technological innovations.
BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has increasingly gained popularity, there are only a few reports mentioning application and outcomes of LDP for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. The aim of our study is to demonstrate technical details of LDP employing radical en bloc procedure (en bloc LDP) and to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of en bloc LDP applied for adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We evaluated 23 consecutive patients who underwent LDP for adenocarcinoma in the body or tail of the pancreas. Our concepts of en bloc LDP for adenocarcinoma comprise 3 principles: en bloc removal of retroperitoneal structures, lymph node (LN) dissection, and preservation of the spleen. RESULTS: En bloc LDP without splenectomy was performed in 17 patients (74%) and en bloc LDP with splenectomy was in 6 patients (26%). Mean ± standard deviation operation time was 203 ± 54 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 208 ± 264 mL. Conversion to open distal pancreatectomy was required in 1 patient (4%) owing to the severe adhesions around the pancreas. The overall morbidity rate following en bloc LDP was 47% (n = 11), and the rate of pancreatic fistula was 39% (n = 9). There were no 30-day or in-hospital mortalities. Mean tumor size was 32 ± 12 mm, and mean number of harvested LNs was 19.8 ± 9.3. No patient had positive margins on final histologic diagnosis. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 67%, 49%, and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSION: En bloc LDP can be applied safely by the surgeon with advanced experience in minimally invasive surgery with satisfactory short- and long-term outcomes, supporting further application of LDP for adenocarcinoma with advances in operative techniques and technological innovations.
Authors: Horacio J Asbun; Jony Van Hilst; Levan Tsamalaidze; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Dominic Sanford; Lucio Pereira; Marc G Besselink; John A Stauffer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Bjørn Edwin; Mushegh A Sahakyan; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink; Marco Braga; Jean-Michel Fabre; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Igor E Khatkov Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Anneke P J Jilesen; Casper H J van Eijck; K H in't Hof; S van Dieren; Dirk J Gouma; Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.352