G Chen1, S Chen1, X Y Zhang1, R P Jiang1, Y Liu1, F H Shi2, T M Xu1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China. 2. Key Lab of Machine Perception, MOE, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the positional stability of miniscrews during orthodontic treatment change in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Twenty adult volunteers were enrolled. METHODS: In all participants, at least two maxillary first premolars were extracted because of protrusion. Each volunteer received six miniscrews in the maxilla, including two loaded miniscrews to retract anterior teeth and four unloaded miniscrews. CBCT scans were obtained at the beginning of space closure (T1) and approximately 11.8 months later (T2). Three-dimensional miniscrew models were constructed at T1 and T2, and the central axes were calculated using a principal component analysis (PCA) technique. Finally, we measured and compared the angle change of all the miniscrews from T1 to T2. RESULTS: The angle change values of the unloaded and loaded miniscrews were 1.64 ± 1.25° and 1.67 ± 1.15°, respectively. No significant differences in the angle change were observed. CONCLUSION: Cone-beam computed tomography images revealed both the unloaded and loaded miniscrews to be positionally stable during en-masse retraction in this study.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the positional stability of miniscrews during orthodontic treatment change in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Twenty adult volunteers were enrolled. METHODS: In all participants, at least two maxillary first premolars were extracted because of protrusion. Each volunteer received six miniscrews in the maxilla, including two loaded miniscrews to retract anterior teeth and four unloaded miniscrews. CBCT scans were obtained at the beginning of space closure (T1) and approximately 11.8 months later (T2). Three-dimensional miniscrew models were constructed at T1 and T2, and the central axes were calculated using a principal component analysis (PCA) technique. Finally, we measured and compared the angle change of all the miniscrews from T1 to T2. RESULTS: The angle change values of the unloaded and loaded miniscrews were 1.64 ± 1.25° and 1.67 ± 1.15°, respectively. No significant differences in the angle change were observed. CONCLUSION: Cone-beam computed tomography images revealed both the unloaded and loaded miniscrews to be positionally stable during en-masse retraction in this study.