BACKGROUND: Current anaphylaxis action plans (AAPs) are based on written instructions without inclusion of pictograms. OBJECTIVES: To develop an AAP with pictorial aids and to prospectively validate the pictogram components of this plan. METHODS: Participants recruited from the emergency department and allergy clinic participated in a questionnaire to validate pictograms depicting key counseling points of an anaphylactic reaction. Children ≥ 10 years of age and caregivers of children < 10 years with acute anaphylaxis or who carried epinephrine auto-injector for confirmed allergy were eligible. Guessability, translucency, and recall were assessed for 11 pictogram designs. Pictograms identified as correct or partially correct by at least 85% of participants were considered valid. Three independent reviewers assessed these outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 115 total participants, 73 (63%) were female, 76 (66%) were parents/guardians, and 39 (34%) were children aged 10-17. Overall, 10 pictograms (91%) reached ≥ 85% for correct guessability, translucency, and recall. Four pictograms were redesigned to reach the preset validation target. One pictogram depicting symptom management (5-min wait time after first epinephrine treatment) reached 82% translucency after redesign. However, it reached 98% and 100% of correct guessability and recall, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We prospectively designed and validated a set of pictograms to be included in an AAP. The incorporation of validated pictograms into an AAP may potentially increase comprehension of the triggers, signs and symptoms, and management of an anaphylactic reaction.
BACKGROUND: Current anaphylaxis action plans (AAPs) are based on written instructions without inclusion of pictograms. OBJECTIVES: To develop an AAP with pictorial aids and to prospectively validate the pictogram components of this plan. METHODS:Participants recruited from the emergency department and allergy clinic participated in a questionnaire to validate pictograms depicting key counseling points of an anaphylactic reaction. Children ≥ 10 years of age and caregivers of children < 10 years with acute anaphylaxis or who carried epinephrine auto-injector for confirmed allergy were eligible. Guessability, translucency, and recall were assessed for 11 pictogram designs. Pictograms identified as correct or partially correct by at least 85% of participants were considered valid. Three independent reviewers assessed these outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 115 total participants, 73 (63%) were female, 76 (66%) were parents/guardians, and 39 (34%) were children aged 10-17. Overall, 10 pictograms (91%) reached ≥ 85% for correct guessability, translucency, and recall. Four pictograms were redesigned to reach the preset validation target. One pictogram depicting symptom management (5-min wait time after first epinephrine treatment) reached 82% translucency after redesign. However, it reached 98% and 100% of correct guessability and recall, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We prospectively designed and validated a set of pictograms to be included in an AAP. The incorporation of validated pictograms into an AAP may potentially increase comprehension of the triggers, signs and symptoms, and management of an anaphylactic reaction.
Authors: Patrick T Reeves; Nathan T Kolasinski; H Shonna Yin; Waleed Alqurashi; Sofia Echelmeyer; Bruno P Chumpitazi; Philip L Rogers; Carolyn Sullivan Burklow; Cade M Nylund Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Piotr Merks; Jameason D Cameron; Marcin Balcerzak; Urszula Religioni; Damian Świeczkowski; Mikołaj Konstanty; Dagmara Hering; Filip M Szymański; Milosz Jaguszewski; Régis Vaillancourt Journal: BMC Prim Care Date: 2022-08-19
Authors: F Estelle R Simons; Motohiro Ebisawa; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Bernard Y Thong; Margitta Worm; Luciana Kase Tanno; Richard F Lockey; Yehia M El-Gamal; Simon Ga Brown; Hae-Sim Park; Aziz Sheikh Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.084