Literature DB >> 25703333

Placebo and nocebo responses in drug trials of epilepsy.

Gaetano Zaccara1, Fabio Giovannelli2, Dieter Schmidt3.   

Abstract

Placebo response can be defined as any therapeutic change on placebo, while the nocebo response is any ill effect during placebo exposure. Several meta-analytic approaches have investigated the extent of placebo response in randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials of focal epilepsies. Placebo response rates (proportion of patients with ≥50% improvement of seizures versus baseline) ranging from 9.9% up to 15.2% have been reported. Interestingly, a sham response of 15.8% has been noted in trials of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Recently, nocebo response rates of 60.3% and 3.9% were noted, which were defined as the proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs) and those withdrawing because of intolerable AEs, respectively. Factors which were found to influence placebo response were as follows: the year of publication (with more recent studies showing higher rates of placebo response), some clinical characteristics of recruited patients (lower placebo response rates with a history of 7 or more prior lifetime AEDs, a high baseline seizure frequency, prior epilepsy surgery, and higher age at diagnosis), trial design and statistical analysis, and whether studies have been conducted in children or adults. Furthermore, placebo and nocebo rates were correlated with respective seizure outcome and adverse events of the experimental AED. Several mechanisms of placebo and nocebo responses are discussed. Specifically, the role of positive or negative expectations of patients and of investigators may influence the placebo and the nocebo response. Finally, recommendations are given on how to address placebo and nocebo responses in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse effects; Antiepileptic drugs; Meta-regression; Nocebo effects; Placebo effects; Side effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25703333     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  11 in total

1.  Confusing placebo effect with natural history in epilepsy: A big data approach.

Authors:  Daniel M Goldenholz; Robert Moss; Jonathan Scott; Sungyoung Auh; William H Theodore
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Neurofeedback impacts cognition and quality of life in pediatric focal epilepsy: An exploratory randomized double-blinded sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Leon Morales-Quezada; Diana Martinez; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Ted J Kaptchuk; M Barry Sterman; Gloria Y Yeh
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.937

3.  Natural variability in seizure frequency: Implications for trials and placebo.

Authors:  Juan Romero; Phil Larimer; Bernard Chang; Shira R Goldenholz; Daniel M Goldenholz
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 4.  Analysis of nocebo effects of antiepileptic drugs across different conditions.

Authors:  Gaetano Zaccara; Fabio Giovannelli; Filippo Sean Giorgi; Valentina Franco; Sara Gasparini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Could Cannabidiol be a Treatment Option for Intractable Childhood and Adolescent Epilepsy?

Authors:  Chung Mo Koo; Hoon-Chul Kang
Journal:  J Epilepsy Res       Date:  2017-06-30

6.  Composition and Use of Cannabis Extracts for Childhood Epilepsy in the Australian Community.

Authors:  A Suraev; N Lintzeris; J Stuart; R C Kevin; R Blackburn; E Richards; J C Arnold; C Ireland; L Todd; D J Allsop; I S McGregor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Highly Purified Cannabidiol for Epilepsy Treatment: A Systematic Review of Epileptic Conditions Beyond Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

Authors:  Simona Lattanzi; Eugen Trinka; Pasquale Striano; Chiara Rocchi; Sergio Salvemini; Mauro Silvestrini; Francesco Brigo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  The right and the wrong with epilepsy and her science.

Authors:  Simon Shorvon; Dieter Schmidt
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2016-08-31

9.  Can Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methods Mitigate Placebo Response Differences Among Patient Populations in Adjunctive Trials of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam?

Authors:  Elyse Swallow; Anna Fang; James Signorovitch; Jonathan Plumb; Simon Borghs
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy.

Authors:  Emilio Perucca; Samuel Wiebe
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2016-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.