Alfredo Serna1, Vicente Puchades2, Fernando Mata2, David Ramos2, Miguel Alcaraz3. 1. Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Santa Lucia University Hospital, 30202 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain. Electronic address: alfredo.serna@carm.es. 2. Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Santa Lucia University Hospital, 30202 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain. 3. Medical Physic Radiology and Physical Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the influence of Multileaf Collimator (MLC) leaf width in radiosurgery treatment planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and 3D Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy (3D-DCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 16 patients with solitary brain metastases treated with radiosurgery via the non-coplanar VMAT were replanned for the 3D-DCA. For each planning technique two MLC leaf width sizes were utilized, i.e. 5 mm and 2.5 mm. These treatment plans were compared using dosimetric indices (conformity, gradient and mean dose for brain tissue) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: An improvement in planning quality for VMAT was observed versus 3D-DCA for any MLC leaf width, mainly with regards to dose conformity and to a lesser extent regards dose gradient. No significant difference was observed for any of both techniques using smaller leaf width. However, dose gradient was improved in favor of the 2.5 mm MLC for either of both techniques (15% VMAT and 10% 3D-DCA); being noticeable for lesions smaller than 10cm(3). Nonetheless, the NTCP index was not significantly affected by variations in the dose gradient index. CONCLUSIONS: This, our present study, suggests that the use of an MLC leaf width of 2.5 mm via the noncoplanar VMAT and 3D-DCA techniques provides improvement in terms of dose gradient for small volumes, over those results obtained with an MLC leaf width of 5 mm. The 3D-DCA does also benefit from MLC leaf widths of a smaller size, mainly in terms of conformity.
PURPOSE: To study the influence of Multileaf Collimator (MLC) leaf width in radiosurgery treatment planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and 3D Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy (3D-DCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 16 patients with solitary brain metastases treated with radiosurgery via the non-coplanar VMAT were replanned for the 3D-DCA. For each planning technique two MLC leaf width sizes were utilized, i.e. 5 mm and 2.5 mm. These treatment plans were compared using dosimetric indices (conformity, gradient and mean dose for brain tissue) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: An improvement in planning quality for VMAT was observed versus 3D-DCA for any MLC leaf width, mainly with regards to dose conformity and to a lesser extent regards dose gradient. No significant difference was observed for any of both techniques using smaller leaf width. However, dose gradient was improved in favor of the 2.5 mm MLC for either of both techniques (15% VMAT and 10% 3D-DCA); being noticeable for lesions smaller than 10cm(3). Nonetheless, the NTCP index was not significantly affected by variations in the dose gradient index. CONCLUSIONS: This, our present study, suggests that the use of an MLC leaf width of 2.5 mm via the noncoplanar VMAT and 3D-DCA techniques provides improvement in terms of dose gradient for small volumes, over those results obtained with an MLC leaf width of 5 mm. The 3D-DCA does also benefit from MLC leaf widths of a smaller size, mainly in terms of conformity.
Authors: Zhanerke Abisheva; Scott R Floyd; Joseph K Salama; John Kirkpatrick; Fang-Fang Yin; Michael J Moravan; William Giles; Justus Adamson Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2019