Literature DB >> 25702756

Primary fluid bolus therapy for infection-associated hypotension in the emergency department.

Miklos Lipcsey1, Jonathan Chiong2, Ivan Subiakto3, Melissa A Kaufman2, Antoine G Schneider4, Rinaldo Bellomo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The physiological changes associated with fluid bolus therapy (FBT) for patients with infection-associated hypotension in the emergency department (ED) are poorly understood. We describe the physiological outcomes of FBT in the first 6 hours (primary FBT) for patients presenting to the ED with infection-associated hypotension.
METHODS: We studied 101 consecutive ED patients with infection and a systolic blood pressure (SBP)<100 mmHg who underwent FBT in the first 6 hours.
RESULTS: We screened 1123 patients with infection and identified 101 eligible patients. The median primary FBT volume given was 1570 mL (interquartile range, 1000- 2490 mL). The average mean arterial pressure (MAP) did not change from admission to 6 hours in the whole cohort, or in patients who were hypotensive on arrival at the ED. However, the average MAP increased from its lowest value during the first 6 hours (66 mmHg [SD, 10 mmHg]) to its value at 6 hours (73 mmHg [SD, 12 mmHg]; P<0.001). The mean heart rate, body temperature, respiratory rate and plasma creatinine level decreased (P<0.05). In patients who were severely hypotensive (SBP<90 mmHg) on arrival at the ED, the MAP increased from 54 mmHg (SD, 8 mmHg) to 70 mmHg (SD, 14 mmHg) (P<0.001). At 6 hours, however, SBP was still <100 mmHg in 44 patients and <90 mmHg in 17 patients. When noradrenaline was used, in 10 patients, hypotension was corrected in all 10 and the MAP increased from 58 mmHg (SD, 9 mmHg) to 75 mmHg (SD, 13 mmHg).
CONCLUSION: Among ED patients admitted to an Australian teaching hospital with infection, hypotension was uncommon. FBT for hypotension was limited in volumes given and failed to achieve a sustained SBP of >100 mmHg in 40% of cases. In contrast, noradrenaline therapy corrected hypotension in all patients who received it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25702756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acute kidney injury in sepsis.

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; John A Kellum; Claudio Ronco; Ron Wald; Johan Martensson; Matthew Maiden; Sean M Bagshaw; Neil J Glassford; Yugeesh Lankadeva; Suvi T Vaara; Antoine Schneider
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Assessment and Management of Hypotension in the Elderly Patient.

Authors:  Himanshu L Kataria; Marc A Jacobson
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

4.  Calibrated cardiac output monitoring versus standard care for fluid management in the shocked ICU patient: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Timothy G Scully; Robert Grealy; Anthony S McLean; Sam R Orde
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2019-01-10

5.  The effects of a limited infusion rate of fluid in the early resuscitation of sepsis on glycocalyx shedding measured by plasma syndecan-1: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jutamas Saoraya; Lipda Wongsamita; Nattachai Srisawat; Khrongwong Musikatavorn
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-01-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.