Literature DB >> 25702222

Current and future diagnostic tools for traumatic brain injury: CT, conventional MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging.

David L Brody1, Christine L Mac Donald2, Joshua S Shimony3.   

Abstract

Brain imaging plays a key role in the assessment of traumatic brain injury. In this review, we present our perspectives on the use of computed tomography (CT), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and newer advanced modalities such as diffusion tensor imaging. Specifically, we address assessment for immediately life-threatening intracranial lesions (noncontrast head CT), assessment of progression of intracranial lesions (noncontrast head CT), documenting intracranial abnormalities for medicolegal reasons (conventional MRI with blood-sensitive sequences), presurgical planning for post-traumatic epilepsy (high spatial resolution conventional MRI), early prognostic decision making (conventional MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging), prognostic assessment for rehabilitative planning (conventional MRI and possibly diffusion tensor imaging in the future), stratification of subjects and pharmacodynamic tracking of targeted therapies in clinical trials (specific MRI sequences or positron emission tomography (PET) ligands, e.g., diffusion tensor imaging for traumatic axonal injury). We would like to emphasize that all of these methods, especially the newer research approaches, require careful radiologic-pathologic validation for optimal interpretation. We have taken this approach in a mouse model of pericontusional traumatic axonal injury. We found that the extent of reduction in the diffusion tensor imaging parameter relative anisotropy directly correlated with the number of amyloid precursor protein (APP)-stained axonal varicosities (r(2)=0.81, p<0.0001, n=20 injured mice). Interestingly, however, the least severe contusional injuries did not result in APP-stained axonal varicosities, but did cause reduction in relative anisotropy. Clearly, both the imaging assessments and the pathologic assessments will require iterative refinement.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amyloid precursor protein; computed tomography; diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; medicolegal documentation; post-traumatic epilepsy; prognosis; radiological-pathological correlation; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25702222     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52892-6.00017-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol        ISSN: 0072-9752


  4 in total

Review 1.  Fluid Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Intended Context of Use.

Authors:  Tanya Bogoslovsky; Jessica Gill; Andreas Jeromin; Cora Davis; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-18

Review 2.  Diffusion MRI and the detection of alterations following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Hutchinson; Susan C Schwerin; Alexandru V Avram; Sharon L Juliano; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  In situ phase contrast X-ray brain CT.

Authors:  Linda C P Croton; Kaye S Morgan; David M Paganin; Lauren T Kerr; Megan J Wallace; Kelly J Crossley; Suzanne L Miller; Naoto Yagi; Kentaro Uesugi; Stuart B Hooper; Marcus J Kitchen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The S-100B level, intracranial pressure, body temperature, and transcranial blood flow velocities predict the outcome of the treatment of severe brain injury.

Authors:  Sebastian Dzierzęcki; Mirosław Ząbek; Gabriela Zapolska; Ryszard Tomasiuk
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.