BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective means of long-term weight loss. Knowledge gaps and lack of engagement in pre-operative patients can result in suboptimal outcome after surgery. Mobile technology, utilizing ecological momentary assessment (EMA)/intervention (EMI), has shown tremendous promise in changing behaviors. The primary objective of the study is to assess feasibility of using smartphone app with EMA/EMI functionality to prepare patients for bariatric surgery. METHODS: Subjects seeking primary bariatric surgery were provided a smartphone app containing video-based education modules with linked assessments to evaluate mastery of topic. Subjects received algorithmic EMA text messages soliciting a response regarding lifestyle behavior. Upon answering, subjects received tailored EMI text messaging supporting healthy lifestyle. RESULTS: Thirty subjects (27 female and 3 male), with age of 41.3 ± 11.4 years and BMI of 46.3 ± 7.4 kg/m(2) were enrolled. Twenty subjects completed the study. Ten subjects withdrew. On average, seven out of nine education modules were completed (70.9 ± 27.3%), and 37.8/123 EMA were answered (30.7 ± 21.7%), with response time of 17.4 ± 4.4 min. Subjects reported high satisfaction with the app. Many felt that the app fit into their routine "somewhat easily" or "very easily" (n = 12), had "perfect" amount of EMA messages (n = 8), and was very helpful in preparing for surgery (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to reveal the feasibility of using a smartphone app in the education and engagement of patients prior to bariatric surgery. The app was well-received based on subject satisfaction scores and revealed trends toward positive behavior change and increased weight loss. Randomized trials are necessary to delineate true efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective means of long-term weight loss. Knowledge gaps and lack of engagement in pre-operative patients can result in suboptimal outcome after surgery. Mobile technology, utilizing ecological momentary assessment (EMA)/intervention (EMI), has shown tremendous promise in changing behaviors. The primary objective of the study is to assess feasibility of using smartphone app with EMA/EMI functionality to prepare patients for bariatric surgery. METHODS: Subjects seeking primary bariatric surgery were provided a smartphone app containing video-based education modules with linked assessments to evaluate mastery of topic. Subjects received algorithmic EMA text messages soliciting a response regarding lifestyle behavior. Upon answering, subjects received tailored EMI text messaging supporting healthy lifestyle. RESULTS: Thirty subjects (27 female and 3 male), with age of 41.3 ± 11.4 years and BMI of 46.3 ± 7.4 kg/m(2) were enrolled. Twenty subjects completed the study. Ten subjects withdrew. On average, seven out of nine education modules were completed (70.9 ± 27.3%), and 37.8/123 EMA were answered (30.7 ± 21.7%), with response time of 17.4 ± 4.4 min. Subjects reported high satisfaction with the app. Many felt that the app fit into their routine "somewhat easily" or "very easily" (n = 12), had "perfect" amount of EMA messages (n = 8), and was very helpful in preparing for surgery (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to reveal the feasibility of using a smartphone app in the education and engagement of patients prior to bariatric surgery. The app was well-received based on subject satisfaction scores and revealed trends toward positive behavior change and increased weight loss. Randomized trials are necessary to delineate true efficacy.
Authors: Elizabeth Pegg Frates; Margaret A Moore; Celeste Nicole Lopez; Graham T McMahon Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Lora E Burke; Molly B Conroy; Susan M Sereika; Okan U Elci; Mindi A Styn; Sushama D Acharya; Mary A Sevick; Linda J Ewing; Karen Glanz Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jennifer R Shapiro; Tina Koro; Neal Doran; Sheri Thompson; James F Sallis; Karen Calfas; Kevin Patrick Journal: Prev Med Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Alice Watson; Timothy Bickmore; Abby Cange; Ambar Kulshreshtha; Joseph Kvedar Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jason D Runyan; Timothy A Steenbergh; Charles Bainbridge; Douglas A Daugherty; Lorne Oke; Brian N Fry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J Murphy; T Uttamlal; K A Schmidtke; I Vlaev; D Taylor; M Ahmad; S Alsters; P Purkayastha; S Scholtz; R Ramezani; A R Ahmed; H Chahal; A Darzi; A I F Blakemore Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Scott G Engel; Ross D Crosby; Graham Thomas; Dale Bond; Jason M Lavender; Tyler Mason; Kristine J Steffen; Dan D Green; Stephen A Wonderlich Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Vadim Goz; Christopher Anthony; Andrew Pugely; Brandon Lawrence; Nicholas Spina; Darrel Brodke; William Ryan Spiker Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2018-05-22
Authors: Sara Simblett; Ben Greer; Faith Matcham; Hannah Curtis; Ashley Polhemus; José Ferrão; Peter Gamble; Til Wykes Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.428