Rebecca Frimenko1, Charles Goodyear2, Dustin Bruening3. 1. Infoscitex: a DCS Company, 4027 Colonel Glenn Highway, Suite 210, Dayton OH 45431-1672, United States. Electronic address: rebecca.frimenko.ctr@us.af.mil. 2. Infoscitex: a DCS Company, 4027 Colonel Glenn Highway, Suite 210, Dayton OH 45431-1672, United States. Electronic address: charles.goodyear.1.ctr@us.af.mil. 3. Air Force Research Laboratories, 2800 Q Street, Building 824, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7947, United States. Electronic address: dustin.bruening.1@us.af.mil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individual studies examining aging-related changes in gait offer conflicting information on differences between male and female spatiotemporal metrics over the course of a mature lifetime. Furthermore, these studies do not often account for a known difference in size between men and women, and thus may reach conclusions based upon size rather than sex differences. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influences of sex, height, and age on spatiotemporal metrics during non-pathological gait over the course of adult aging. DATA SOURCES: Potentially relevant articles were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using the key words 'gait,' 'walk', 'gender,' 'sex,' 'female,' 'male,' 'gait speed,' 'step length,' and 'cadence.' ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: (1) article could be obtained in English, (2) contained information about non-pathological subjects, (3) analyzed kinematics of walking, (4) provided female and male data, (5) average female/male age difference not more than 5 years, (6) reported a measure of variance and number of subjects, and (7) no known retractions associated with the publication. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Non-dimensional gait speed analysis suggests that gait speed differences between men and women may be an artifact of size rather than sex. In both raw and dimensionless data, this analysis indicates that men may take longer step lengths than women, and women may have a higher cadence than men. This analysis also identified a possible increase in many metrics between 20 and 40 years of age, before decreasing around the fifth decade of life. Future studies should examine these trends across the entire lifespan. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Individual studies examining aging-related changes in gait offer conflicting information on differences between male and female spatiotemporal metrics over the course of a mature lifetime. Furthermore, these studies do not often account for a known difference in size between men and women, and thus may reach conclusions based upon size rather than sex differences. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influences of sex, height, and age on spatiotemporal metrics during non-pathological gait over the course of adult aging. DATA SOURCES: Potentially relevant articles were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using the key words 'gait,' 'walk', 'gender,' 'sex,' 'female,' 'male,' 'gait speed,' 'step length,' and 'cadence.' ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: (1) article could be obtained in English, (2) contained information about non-pathological subjects, (3) analyzed kinematics of walking, (4) provided female and male data, (5) average female/male age difference not more than 5 years, (6) reported a measure of variance and number of subjects, and (7) no known retractions associated with the publication. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Non-dimensional gait speed analysis suggests that gait speed differences between men and women may be an artifact of size rather than sex. In both raw and dimensionless data, this analysis indicates that men may take longer step lengths than women, and women may have a higher cadence than men. This analysis also identified a possible increase in many metrics between 20 and 40 years of age, before decreasing around the fifth decade of life. Future studies should examine these trends across the entire lifespan. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors: Alexandra M V Wennberg; Timothy G Lesnick; Christopher G Schwarz; Rodolfo Savica; Clinton E Hagen; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; John H Hollman; Prashanthi Vemuri; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Woei-Nan Bair; Michael Petr; Irene Alfaras; Sarah J Mitchell; Michel Bernier; Luigi Ferrucci; Stephanie A Studenski; Rafael De Cabo Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Anne-Marie De Cock; Erik Fransen; Stany Perkisas; Veronique Verhoeven; Olivier Beauchet; Roy Remmen; Maurits Vandewoude Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Kimberly Byrnes; Corina Nüesch; Stefan Loske; Andrea Leuenberger; Stefan Schären; Cordula Netzer; Annegret Mündermann Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 4.566