Literature DB >> 25702071

Safety, efficacy and acceptability of outpatient mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion through 70 days since last menstrual period in public sector facilities in Mexico City.

Patricio Sanhueza Smith1, Melanie Peña2, Ilana G Dzuba3, María Laura García Martinez4, Ana Gabriela Aranguré Peraza5, Manuel Bousiéguez6, Tara Shochet7, Beverly Winikoff8.   

Abstract

Extensive evidence exists regarding the efficacy and acceptability of medical abortion through 63 days since last menstrual period (LMP). In Mexico City's Secretariat of Health (SSDF) outpatient facilities, mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion is the first-line approach for abortion care in this pregnancy range. Recent research demonstrates continued high rates of complete abortion through 70 days LMP. To expand access to legal abortion services in Mexico City (where abortion is legal through 12 weeks LMP), this study sought to assess the efficacy and acceptability of the standard outpatient approach through 70 days in two SSDF points of service. One thousand and one women seeking pregnancy termination were enrolled and given 200 mg mifepristone followed by 800 μg misoprostol 24-48 hours later. Women were asked to return to the clinic one week later for evaluation. The great majority of women (93.3%; 95% CI: 91.6-94.8) had complete abortions. Women with pregnancies ≤ 8 weeks LMP had significantly higher success rates than women in the 9th or 10th weeks (94.9% vs. 90.5%; p = 0.01). The difference in success rates between the 9th and 10th weeks was not significant (90.0% vs. 91.2%; p = 0.71). The majority of women found the side effects (82.9%) and the use of misoprostol (84.4%) to be very acceptable or acceptable. This study provides additional evidence supporting an extended outpatient medical abortion regimen through 10 weeks LMP.
Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Health Matters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mexico; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25702071     DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(15)43825-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  6 in total

1.  Mifepristone.

Authors:  Sheila Dunn; Melissa Brooks
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Telemedicine and medical abortion: dispelling safety myths, with facts.

Authors:  Roopan Gill; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 3.  Reducing the harms of unsafe abortion: a systematic review of the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of harm reduction counselling for pregnant persons seeking induced abortion.

Authors:  Bianca Maria Stifani; Roopan Gill; Caron Rahn Kim
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-11

4.  Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Deborah Constant; Jane Harries; Jennifer Moodley; Landon Myer
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Accuracy of Assessment of Eligibility for Early Medical Abortion by Community Health Workers in Ethiopia, India and South Africa.

Authors:  Heidi Bart Johnston; Bela Ganatra; My Huong Nguyen; Ndema Habib; Mesganaw Fantahun Afework; Jane Harries; Kirti Iyengar; Jennifer Moodley; Hailu Yeneneh Lema; Deborah Constant; Swapnaleen Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio's Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Nicole E Johns; Sarah L Combellick; Julia E Kohn; Lisa M Keder; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.