INTRODUCTION: Administration of anticoagulation is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Vitamin K antagonists require regular monitoring and dosage adjustment. Dabigatran administered in a standard dose twice daily is more convenient and achieves a stable anticoagulant effect, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with LVADs has not been investigated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether dabigatran can be used safely as a second-line anticoagulation option in patients with a HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD. METHODS: The study population consisted of 7 consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent HMII implantation and sequentially received acenocoumarol and dabigatran. Occurrence of stroke, systematic embolism, device thrombosis and major or life-threatening bleeding were included in the analysis. An acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >2 g/dL or a need for transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) was defined as major bleeding, while an acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >5 g/dL, fatal, symptomatic intracranial bleed, need for transfusion of at least 4 units PRBC, or association with hypotension requiring the use of intravenous inotropic agents or surgical intervention was defined as life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: The duration of follow up was 1564 ± 292 days. Patients received acenocoumarol for 855 ± 246 days, followed by dabigatran for 708 ± 368 days. The rates of thromboembolic events were similar under dabigatran and acenocoumarol treatment: strokes, 0.094 vs. 0 /patient-year, p=0.36; systemic embolism, no event in either group; and device thrombosis, 0.053 vs. 0.258 events/patient-year, p=0.19, respectively. Compared to an adjusted acenocoumarol dose, the standard dabigatran dose resulted in similar rates of life-threatening bleeding, but significantly lower rates of major bleeding (0.18 vs. 0.27 bleeds/patient-years, p=0.76, and 0.047 vs. 0.547, p<0.001, for dabigatran and acenocoumarol, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The safe and effective use of dabigatran as a second-line anticoagulation therapy in patients with HMII seems feasible. However, these data must be confirmed in a randomized study.
INTRODUCTION: Administration of anticoagulation is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Vitamin K antagonists require regular monitoring and dosage adjustment. Dabigatran administered in a standard dose twice daily is more convenient and achieves a stable anticoagulant effect, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with LVADs has not been investigated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether dabigatran can be used safely as a second-line anticoagulation option in patients with a HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD. METHODS: The study population consisted of 7 consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent HMII implantation and sequentially received acenocoumarol and dabigatran. Occurrence of stroke, systematic embolism, device thrombosis and major or life-threatening bleeding were included in the analysis. An acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >2 g/dL or a need for transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) was defined as major bleeding, while an acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >5 g/dL, fatal, symptomatic intracranial bleed, need for transfusion of at least 4 units PRBC, or association with hypotension requiring the use of intravenous inotropic agents or surgical intervention was defined as life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: The duration of follow up was 1564 ± 292 days. Patients received acenocoumarol for 855 ± 246 days, followed by dabigatran for 708 ± 368 days. The rates of thromboembolic events were similar under dabigatran and acenocoumarol treatment: strokes, 0.094 vs. 0 /patient-year, p=0.36; systemic embolism, no event in either group; and device thrombosis, 0.053 vs. 0.258 events/patient-year, p=0.19, respectively. Compared to an adjusted acenocoumarol dose, the standard dabigatran dose resulted in similar rates of life-threatening bleeding, but significantly lower rates of major bleeding (0.18 vs. 0.27 bleeds/patient-years, p=0.76, and 0.047 vs. 0.547, p<0.001, for dabigatran and acenocoumarol, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The safe and effective use of dabigatran as a second-line anticoagulation therapy in patients with HMII seems feasible. However, these data must be confirmed in a randomized study.
Authors: Amish N Raval; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Mina K Chung; Larry J Diaz-Sandoval; Deborah Diercks; Jonathan P Piccini; Hee Soo Jung; Jeffrey B Washam; Babu G Welch; Allyson R Zazulia; Sean P Collins Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Noah Weingarten; Cindy Song; Amit Iyengar; David Alan Herbst; Mark Helmers; Danika Meldrum; Sara Guevara-Plunkett; Jessica Dominic; Pavan Atluri Journal: Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2022-09-21
Authors: Martin Andreas; Roxana Moayedifar; Georg Wieselthaler; Michael Wolzt; Julia Riebandt; Thomas Haberl; Philipp Angleitner; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Dominik Wiedemann; Heinrich Schima; Guenther Laufer; Daniel Zimpfer Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 8.790