Literature DB >> 25701532

A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.

Xian Quan Shi1, Jun Lai Li2, Wen Bo Wan1, Yan Huang3.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether a combination of shear wave elastography (SWE) quantitative parameters could improve the accuracy of ultrasonography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Two hundred seventy-nine breast lesions in 251 women were evaluated with ultrasonography and SWE; pathologic results of all lesions were available. Each lesion was classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for ultrasound. SWE quantitative parameters, including maximum elastic value (Emax), mean elastic value (E mean), standard deviation (SD) and ratio of E mean of the lesion to E mean of the surrounding parenchyma (E ratio), were recorded. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine their cutoff values. When any of the four parameters was equal to or higher than the cutoff value, the set of SWE parameters was counted as positive. When both BI-RADS and the set were positive, lesions were evaluated as positive for malignancy. We compared the performance of this combination with use of BI-RADS, Emax, E mean, SD or E ratio alone and also with the combination of BI-RADS and Emax for benign/malignant differentiation. The combination of Emax, E mean, SD, or E ratio with BI-RADS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and Youden index of 0.967, 0.912, 0.908, 0.969, 0.938 and 0.879, respectively. The accuracy was the highest (p < 0.01) without loss of sensitivity. Combining a set of SWE quantitative parameters (E max, E mean, SD and E ratio) could improve the accuracy of ultrasonography in differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, without loss of sensitivity.
Copyright © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Routine diagnostic tests; Shear wave elastography; Sonoelastography; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25701532     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values.

Authors:  Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Alessia Angela Maria Orlando; Mariangela Dimarco; Calogero Zarcaro; Fabiola Ferraro; Alessandra Cirino; Domenica Matranga; Salvatore Vieni; Daniela Cabibi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Which combination of different ultrasonography modalities is more appropriate to diagnose breast cancer?: A network meta-analysis (a PRISMA-compliant article).

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Jialing Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Yun Woo Chang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Role of "Stiff Rim" sign obtained by shear wave elastography in diagnosis and guiding therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Xu; Hui-Ling Gong; Bin Hu; Bing Hu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.