Literature DB >> 25701278

Not all attention orienting is created equal: recognition memory is enhanced when attention orienting involves distractor suppression.

Julie Markant1, Michael S Worden2, Dima Amso3.   

Abstract

Learning through visual exploration often requires orienting of attention to meaningful information in a cluttered world. Previous work has shown that attention modulates visual cortex activity, with enhanced activity for attended targets and suppressed activity for competing inputs, thus enhancing the visual experience. Here we examined the idea that learning may be engaged differentially with variations in attention orienting mechanisms that drive eye movements during visual search and exploration. We hypothesized that attention orienting mechanisms that engaged suppression of a previously attended location would boost memory encoding of the currently attended target objects to a greater extent than those that involve target enhancement alone. To test this hypothesis we capitalized on the classic spatial cueing task and the inhibition of return (IOR) mechanism (Posner, 1980; Posner, Rafal, & Choate, 1985) to demonstrate that object images encoded in the context of concurrent suppression at a previously attended location were encoded more effectively and remembered better than those encoded without concurrent suppression. Furthermore, fMRI analyses revealed that this memory benefit was driven by attention modulation of visual cortex activity, as increased suppression of the previously attended location in visual cortex during target object encoding predicted better subsequent recognition memory performance. These results suggest that not all attention orienting impacts learning and memory equally.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distractor suppression; Recognition memory; Selective attention; Spatial cueing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25701278      PMCID: PMC4397169          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  51 in total

1.  Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Jens Schwarzbach; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Ethan M Meyers; Narcisse P Bichot; Thomas Serre; Tomaso A Poggio; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Control of spatial and feature-based attention in frontoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Adam S Greenberg; Michael Esterman; Daryl Wilson; John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Space-based but not object-based inhibition of return is impaired in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin; J Vincent Filoteo; David D Song; David P Salmon
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Recognition Memory in Marmoset and Macaque Monkeys: A Comparison of Active Vision.

Authors:  Samuel U Nummela; Michael J Jutras; John T Wixted; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Cory T Miller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Visual selective attention biases contribute to the other-race effect among 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Lisa M Oakes; Dima Amso
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  What underlies visual selective attention development? Evidence that age-related improvements in visual feature integration influence visual selective attention performance.

Authors:  Andrew Lynn; Elena K Festa; William C Heindel; Dima Amso
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-11-23

4.  The Relation between Infant Covert Orienting, Sustained Attention and Brain Activity.

Authors:  Wanze Xie; John E Richards
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  The Role of Visual Association Cortex in Associative Memory Formation across Development.

Authors:  Maya L Rosen; Margaret A Sheridan; Kelly A Sambrook; Matthew R Peverill; Andrew N Meltzoff; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 7.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The Development of Selective Attention Orienting is an Agent of Change in Learning and Memory Efficacy.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Dima Amso
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2015-08-14

9.  When increasing distraction helps learning: Distractor number and content interact in their effects on memory.

Authors:  Kate Nussenbaum; Dima Amso; Julie Markant
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.