Literature DB >> 25701272

Informed choice in screening needs more than information.

Minna Johansson1, John Brodersen2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25701272     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60258-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Do invitations for cervical screening provide sufficient information to enable informed choice? A cross-sectional study of invitations for publicly funded cervical screening.

Authors:  Sie Karen Kolthoff; Mie Sara Hestbech; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; John Brodersen
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Informed decision-making and breast cancer screening.

Authors:  P D Sasieni; R A Smith; S W Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Impact of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management on women's knowledge and intentions: a randomised online experimental survey study.

Authors:  Susanne F Meisel; Maddie Freeman; Jo Waller; Lindsay Fraser; Sue Gessler; Ian Jacobs; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Ranjit Manchanda; Belinda Rahman; Lucy Side; Jane Wardle; Anne Lanceley; Saskia C Sanderson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2020-02-03

7.  Why are the public so positive about colorectal cancer screening?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Factors Related to Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: Retrospective Cohort Study of 120,587 French Men Over the Age of 50 Years.

Authors:  Heloise Schmeltz; Sylvain Rocher; Cédric Rat; France Nanin; Aurélie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2018-10-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.