Timothée Jacquesson1, Moncef Berhouma2, Stéphane Tringali3, Emile Simon4, Emmanuel Jouanneau2. 1. Skull Base Multidisciplinary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon Cedex, France; Department of Anatomy, University of Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: timothee.jacquesson@neurochirurgie.fr. 2. Skull Base Multidisciplinary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon Cedex, France. 3. Skull Base Multidisciplinary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon Cedex, France; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pierre Benite, France. 4. Department of Anatomy, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Petroclival tumors remain a surgical challenge. Classically, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) has long been used to reach such tumors, whereas the anterior petrosectomy (AP) has been proposed to avoid crossing cranial nerves. More recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach has been "expanded" (i.e., EEEA) to the petroclival region. We aimed to compare these 3 approaches to help in the surgical management of petroclival tumors. METHODS: Petroclival approaches were performed on 5 specimens after they were prepared with formaldehyde colored via latex injection. RESULTS: The EEEA provides a simple straightforward route to the clivus, but reaching the petrous apex requires the surgeon to circumvent the internal carotid artery either via a medial transclival, an inferior transpterygoid, or a lateral variant through the Meckel's cave. In contrast, the AP offers a narrow direct superolateral access to the petroclival region crossed by the trigeminal nerve. Finally, the RSA provides a wide simple and quick exposure of the cerebellopontine angle, but access to the petroclival region needs the surgeon to deal with the V(th) to XI(th) cranial nerves. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: The EEEA should be preferred for extradural midline tumors (chordomas, chondrosarcomas) or for cystic lesions when drainage is essential. The AP could be optimal for the radical removal of intradural vascularized tumors (meningiomas) with intrapetrous or supratentorial extensions. The RSA retains an advantage for small or cystic tumors near the internal acoustic meatus. The skull base surgeon has to master all of these routes to choose the more appropriate one according to the surgical objective, the tumor characteristics, and the patient's medical status.
OBJECTIVE:Petroclival tumors remain a surgical challenge. Classically, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) has long been used to reach such tumors, whereas the anterior petrosectomy (AP) has been proposed to avoid crossing cranial nerves. More recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach has been "expanded" (i.e., EEEA) to the petroclival region. We aimed to compare these 3 approaches to help in the surgical management of petroclival tumors. METHODS: Petroclival approaches were performed on 5 specimens after they were prepared with formaldehyde colored via latex injection. RESULTS: The EEEA provides a simple straightforward route to the clivus, but reaching the petrous apex requires the surgeon to circumvent the internal carotid artery either via a medial transclival, an inferior transpterygoid, or a lateral variant through the Meckel's cave. In contrast, the AP offers a narrow direct superolateral access to the petroclival region crossed by the trigeminal nerve. Finally, the RSA provides a wide simple and quick exposure of the cerebellopontine angle, but access to the petroclival region needs the surgeon to deal with the V(th) to XI(th) cranial nerves. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: The EEEA should be preferred for extradural midline tumors (chordomas, chondrosarcomas) or for cystic lesions when drainage is essential. The AP could be optimal for the radical removal of intradural vascularized tumors (meningiomas) with intrapetrous or supratentorial extensions. The RSA retains an advantage for small or cystic tumors near the internal acoustic meatus. The skull base surgeon has to master all of these routes to choose the more appropriate one according to the surgical objective, the tumor characteristics, and the patient's medical status.
Authors: Hazem M Negm; Harminder Singh; Sivashanmugam Dhandapani; Salomon Cohen; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2017-08-17
Authors: Zaid Aljuboori; Ahmad Alhourani; Mohammed Nuru; Candice Nguyen; Heegook Yeo; Brian Williams; Norberto Andaluz Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2020-09-10
Authors: João Mangussi-Gomes; João T Alves-Belo; Huy Q Truong; Gustavo F Nogueira; Eric W Wang; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2020-09-10
Authors: Jianfeng Liu; Carlos D Pinheiro-Neto; Dazhang Yang; Eric Wang; Paul A Gardner; Barry E Hirsch; Carl H Snyderman; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-07-05
Authors: E Suero Molina; J M Revuelta Barbero; C Ewelt; W Stummer; R L Carrau; D M Prevedello Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.042