Literature DB >> 25700703

Tumor plasma flow determined by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI predicts response to induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Jonathan M Bernstein1, Lucy E Kershaw2, Stephanie B Withey2, Natalie M Lowe3, Jarrod J Homer4, Nicholas J Slevin3, Suzanne C Bonington5, Bernadette M Carrington5, Catharine M West3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Non-response to induction chemotherapy (IC) occurs in 30% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and has been predicted by tumor plasma flow (Fp) derived by perfusion computed tomography. The present study was designed to test whether baseline tumor Fp determined by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) would predict IC response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective open study powered to test the relationship between tumor Fp and response to IC (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) enrolled 50 patients with stage IV HNSCC. Response after two IC cycles was measured by MRI using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in 37 patients. Tumor Fp (primary end point) and multiple parameters in tumors and lymph nodes (secondary end points) were generated at baseline. Differences in baseline DCE-MRI parameters according to IC response were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test, and predictive value by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Median baseline tumor Fp was 53.2ml/100ml/min in 25 responders and 23.9 in 12 non-responders (U 82; P=0.027; area under ROC curve (AUC) 0.73). Median baseline Fp in lymph nodes was 25.8ml/100ml/min for 37 nodes in 25 responders and 17.1 for 15 nodes in 12 non-responders (U 186, P=0.066; AUC 0.67). Frequency of IC response in 37 patients was 68% overall, 83% for tumor Fp above the median (40.6ml/100ml/min) and 45% below the median. Other DCE-MRI parameters were not associated with IC response.
CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment tumor Fp determined by DCE-MRI predicts IC response in HNSCC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE–MRI); Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; Induction chemotherapy; Plasma flow; Treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25700703     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  10 in total

1.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Intracellular Water Lifetime (τ i ): A Prognostic Marker for Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  S Chawla; L A Loevner; S G Kim; W-T Hwang; S Wang; G Verma; S Mohan; V LiVolsi; H Quon; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Differential diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in non-cystic lesions in floor of the mouth.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Mengda Jiang; Lizhong Wu; Xiaofeng Tao
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Taxane, platinum and 5-FU prior to chemoradiotherapy benefits patients with stage IV neck node-positive head and neck cancer and a good performance status.

Authors:  Natalie M Lowe; Jonathan M Bernstein; Kathleen Mais; Kate Garcez; Lip W Lee; Andrew Sykes; David J Thomson; Jarrod J Homer; Catharine M West; Nicholas J Slevin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Normalized Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and DWI-ADC for Differentiation between Posttreatment Changes and Recurrence in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  A Baba; R Kurokawa; E Rawie; M Kurokawa; Y Ota; A Srinivasan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 5.  Predictive Biomarkers for Response and Toxicity of Induction Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Łukasz Boguszewicz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Evaluation of Head and Neck Tumors with Functional MR Imaging.

Authors:  Jacobus F A Jansen; Carlos Parra; Yonggang Lu; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Pre-treatment tumour perfusion parameters and initial RECIST response do not predict long-term survival outcomes for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Natalie M Lowe; Lucy E Kershaw; Jonathan M Bernstein; Stephanie B Withey; Kathleen Mais; Jarrod J Homer; Nicholas J Slevin; Suzanne C Bonington; Bernadette M Carrington; Catharine M West
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Correlations of tumour permeability parameters with apparent diffusion coefficient in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Alan W L Mui; Anne W M Lee; W T Ng; Victor H F Lee; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Shei S Y Man; Daniel T T Chua; X Y Guan
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 9.  Functional MRI for Treatment Evaluation in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review of the Literature from a Radiologist Perspective.

Authors:  Roland P Nooij; Jan J Hof; Peter Jan van Laar; Anouk van der Hoorn
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-22

10.  Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16- High Risk Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Madhava Aryal; Pin Li; Choonik Lee; Matthew Schipper; Peter G Hawkins; Christina Chapman; Dawn Owen; Aleksandar F Dragovic; Paul Swiecicki; Keith Casper; Francis Worden; Theodore S Lawrence; Avraham Eisbruch; Michelle Mierzwa
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.