Literature DB >> 2569997

A comparison of acrivastine versus clemastine and placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.

F Leyh1, S G Harvey, J R Gibson, V K Manna.   

Abstract

Twenty patients of mean age 41.3 years, with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were assessed in a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of acrivastine at two doses (8 mg and 4 mg) versus 1 mg clemastine and placebo, given three times per day. All active preparations were found to be effective, and significantly better than placebo, in controlling the signs and symptoms of urticaria. There was a higher incidence of sedation with clemastine than with either acrivastine or placebo, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance in this small study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2569997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  3 in total

Review 1.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

Review 2.  Acrivastine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in allergic rhinitis, urticaria and related disorders.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Urticaria. Recognition, causes and treatment.

Authors:  A D Ormerod
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.