Literature DB >> 2569995

A comparison of acrivastine versus terfenadine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

T van Joost1, F B Blog, W Westerhof, F C Jansen, T M Starink, M S den Boer, J J Kuneman, S G Harvey, J R Gibson.   

Abstract

Patients (n = 56) with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were assessed in a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of acrivastine at two doses (8 and 4 mg) versus 60 mg terfenadine and placebo administered three times daily. All three active preparations were found to be effective, and significantly better than placebo, in controlling the signs and symptoms of urticaria. No significant differences were found between the active preparations, although in some cases efficacy trends favoured 8 mg acrivastine and terfenadine over 4 mg acrivastine. No significant differences were noted between the active treatments and placebo with regard to reports of drowsiness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2569995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  4 in total

1.  Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review.

Authors:  J W Slater; A D Zechnich; D G Haxby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

Review 3.  Acrivastine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in allergic rhinitis, urticaria and related disorders.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  A Review of Antithrombotic Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia After Endovascular Intervention.

Authors:  Amol Gupta; Michael S Lee; Kush Gupta; Vinod Kumar; Sarath Reddy
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2019-10-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.