Literature DB >> 25699478

What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes?

Natalia Basile1, Mauro Caiazzo, Marcos Meseguer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Time lapse technology represents a new tool in the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory. It can aid the embryologist in the detection of objective and quantifiable markers associated with embryo viability and implantation. The purpose of this review is to explain how embryo morphokinetics can be used as an adjunct to standard morphological assessment and to evaluate its potential value to improve IVF outcomes. RECENT
FINDINGS: Several algorithms have been developed. Some utilize early kinetic markers, whereas others rely more on later stages of embryo development. Even though over a handful of randomized control trials are in progress, at this point, only one has been published demonstrating a significant increase in implantation rates and ongoing pregnancy rates when selecting embryos on the basis of a combination of morphological assessment and morphokinetics.
SUMMARY: We believe that standard morphological assessment should remain the gold standard to initiate embryo evaluation; however, if possible, it can be complemented with the use of morphokinetics. This new approach will allow the embryologist to perform a more accurate and objective embryo selection and therefore reduce the number of embryos transferred while maintaining or even improving clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25699478     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  8 in total

1.  IVF: a short but exciting story.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Garcia Velasco; Emre Seli
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Improving the safety of the embryo and the patient during in vitro fertilization procedures.

Authors:  Artur Wdowiak; Edyta Wdowiak; Iwona Bojar
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Early Fertilization Abnormalities in the Human: An Exhausted Area of Research?

Authors:  Bernd Rosenbusch
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

5.  Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome.

Authors:  Emma Adolfsson; Anna Nowosad Andershed
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01

6.  Pseudo contrastive labeling for predicting IVF embryo developmental potential.

Authors:  I Erlich; A Ben-Meir; I Har-Vardi; J Grifo; F Wang; C Mccaffrey; D McCulloh; Y Or; L Wolf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Embryonic Development in Relation to Maternal Obesity Does Not Affect Pregnancy Outcomes in FET Cycles.

Authors:  Adham Fawarseh; Yuval Atzmon; Nardin Aslih; Asaf Bilgory; Einat Shalom-Paz
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10

8.  MicroRNA Profiles in Spontaneous Decidualized Menstrual Endometrium and Early Pregnancy Decidua with Successfully Implanted Embryos.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yang Lv; Shujun Gao; Yuanyuan Zhang; Jiajia Sun; Chunling Gong; Xiujuan Chen; Guangpeng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.