Literature DB >> 25699002

Measurement equivalence in mixed mode surveys.

Joop J Hox1, Edith D De Leeuw1, Eva A O Zijlmans2.   

Abstract

Surveys increasingly use mixed mode data collection (e.g., combining face-to-face and web) because this controls costs and helps to maintain good response rates. However, a combination of different survey modes in one study, be it cross-sectional or longitudinal, can lead to different kinds of measurement errors. For example, respondents in a face-to-face survey or a web survey may interpret the same question differently, and might give a different answer, just because of the way the question is presented. This effect of survey mode on the question-answer process is called measurement mode effect. This study develops methodological and statistical tools to identify the existence and size of mode effects in a mixed mode survey. In addition, it assesses the size and importance of mode effects in measurement instruments using a specific mixed mode panel survey (Netherlands Kinship Panel Study). Most measurement instruments in the NKPS are multi-item scales, therefore confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) will be used as the main analysis tool, using propensity score methods to correct for selection effects. The results show that the NKPS scales by and large have measurement equivalence, but in most cases only partial measurement equivalence. Controlling for respondent differences on demographic variables, and on scale scores from the previous uni-mode measurement occasion, tends to improve measurement equivalence, but not for all scales. The discussion ends with a review of the implications of our results for analyses employing these scales.

Entities:  

Keywords:  measurement equivalence; measurement invariance; mixed mode survey; mode effect; propensity score adjustment; selection bias

Year:  2015        PMID: 25699002      PMCID: PMC4318282          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  3 in total

1.  Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches.

Authors:  M Couper
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.

Authors:  Michael W Link; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

3.  Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance.

Authors:  Rens van de Schoot; Anouck Kluytmans; Lars Tummers; Peter Lugtig; Joop Hox; Bengt Muthén
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-23
  3 in total
  14 in total

1.  Estimation of Mode Effects in the Health and Retirement Study Using Measurement Models.

Authors:  Alexandru Cernat; Mick P Couper; Mary Beth Ofstedal
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2016-10-07

2.  Some Behaviorial Science Measurement Concerns and Proposals.

Authors:  John R Nesselroade; Peter C M Molenaar
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Ramadan: the month of fasting for muslim and social cohesion-mapping the unexplored effect.

Authors:  Nurus Shalihin; Muhammad Sholihin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-07

4.  Using the Web to Collect Data on Sensitive Behaviours: A Study Looking at Mode Effects on the British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.

Authors:  Sarah Burkill; Andrew Copas; Mick P Couper; Soazig Clifton; Philip Prah; Jessica Datta; Frederick Conrad; Kaye Wellings; Anne M Johnson; Bob Erens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey.

Authors:  Marcella K Jones; Liviana Calzavara; Dan Allman; Catherine A Worthington; Mark Tyndall; James Iveniuk
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-07-29

6.  Mixing modes in a population-based interview survey: comparison of a sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public health research.

Authors:  Elvira Mauz; Elena von der Lippe; Jennifer Allen; Ralph Schilling; Stephan Müters; Jens Hoebel; Patrick Schmich; Matthias Wetzstein; Panagiotis Kamtsiuris; Cornelia Lange
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2018-01-04

7.  Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.

Authors:  Elvira Mauz; Robert Hoffmann; Robin Houben; Laura Krause; Panagiotis Kamtsiuris; Antje Gößwald
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Intergenerational Educational Pathways and Self-Rated Health in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: Results of the German KiGGS Cohort.

Authors:  Julia Waldhauer; Benjamin Kuntz; Elvira Mauz; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Editorial: Measurement Invariance.

Authors:  Rens Van De Schoot; Peter Schmidt; Alain De Beuckelaer; Kimberley Lek; Marielle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-28

10.  The Importance of Isomorphism for Conclusions about Homology: A Bayesian Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling Approach with Ordinal Indicators.

Authors:  Nigel Guenole
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.