Literature DB >> 25698757

Positively charged amino acids at the SNAP-25 C terminus determine fusion rates, fusion pore properties, and energetics of tight SNARE complex zippering.

Qinghua Fang1, Ying Zhao1, Adam Drew Herbst2, Brian N Kim2, Manfred Lindau3.   

Abstract

SNAP-25 is a Q-SNARE protein mediating exocytosis of neurosecretory vesicles including chromaffin granules. Previous results with a SNAP-25 construct lacking the nine C terminal residues (SNAP-25Δ9) showed changed fusion pore properties (Fang et al., 2008), suggesting a model for fusion pore mechanics that couple C terminal zipping of the SNARE complex to the opening of the fusion pore. The deleted fragment contains the positively charged residues R198 and K201, adjacent to layers 7 and 8 of the SNARE complex. To determine how fusion pore conductance and dynamics depend on these residues, single exocytotic events in bovine chromaffin cells expressing R198Q, R198E, K201Q, or K201E mutants were investigated by carbon fiber amperometry and cell-attached patch capacitance measurements. Coarse grain molecular dynamics simulations revealed spontaneous transitions between a loose and tightly zippered state at the SNARE complex C terminus. The SNAP-25 K201Q mutant showed no changes compared with SNAP-25 wild-type. However, K201E, R198Q, and R198E displayed reduced release frequencies, slower release kinetics, and prolonged fusion pore duration that were correlated with reduced probability to engage in the tightly zippered state. The results show that the positively charged amino acids at the SNAP-25 C terminus promote tight SNARE complex zippering and are required for high release frequency and rapid release in individual fusion events.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/353230-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNAP-25; amperometry; capacitance; chromaffin cells; exocytosis; fusion pore

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698757      PMCID: PMC4331636          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2905-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  High calcium concentrations shift the mode of exocytosis to the kiss-and-run mechanism.

Authors:  E Alés; L Tabares; J M Poyato; V Valero; M Lindau; G Alvarez de Toledo
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Electrostatic interactions between the syntaxin membrane anchor and neurotransmitter passing through the fusion pore.

Authors:  Xue Han; Meyer B Jackson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Vesicle size determines unitary exocytic properties and their sensitivity to sphingosine.

Authors:  Ajda Flašker; Jernej Jorgačevski; Ana I Calejo; Marko Kreft; Robert Zorec
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 4.  Conflicting views on the membrane fusion machinery and the fusion pore.

Authors:  Jakob B Sørensen
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 A resolution.

Authors:  R B Sutton; D Fasshauer; R Jahn; A T Brunger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium regulator of release probability.

Authors:  R Fernández-Chacón; A Königstorfer; S H Gerber; J García; M F Matos; C F Stevens; N Brose; J Rizo; C Rosenmund; T C Südhof
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Modifications in the C terminus of the synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25) and in the complementary region of synaptobrevin affect the final steps of exocytosis.

Authors:  Anabel Gil; Luis M Gutiérrez; Carmen Carrasco-Serrano; M Teresa Alonso; Salvador Viniegra; Manuel Criado
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Synaptobrevin N-terminally bound to syntaxin-SNAP-25 defines the primed vesicle state in regulated exocytosis.

Authors:  Alexander M Walter; Katrin Wiederhold; Dieter Bruns; Dirk Fasshauer; Jakob B Sørensen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Exocytotic catecholamine release is not associated with cation flux through channels in the vesicle membrane but Na+ influx through the fusion pore.

Authors:  Liang-Wei Gong; Guillermo Alvarez de Toledo; Manfred Lindau
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  F-actin and myosin II accelerate catecholamine release from chromaffin granules.

Authors:  Khajak Berberian; Alexis J Torres; Qinghua Fang; Kassandra Kisler; Manfred Lindau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Extracellular and intracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate distinctly regulates exocytosis in chromaffin cells.

Authors:  Zhong-Jiao Jiang; Taylor L Delaney; Mark P Zanin; Rainer V Haberberger; Stuart M Pitson; Jian Huang; Simon Alford; Stephanie M Cologna; Damien J Keating; Liang-Wei Gong
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 5.372

2.  Multiscale Simulations of Biological Membranes: The Challenge To Understand Biological Phenomena in a Living Substance.

Authors:  Giray Enkavi; Matti Javanainen; Waldemar Kulig; Tomasz Róg; Ilpo Vattulainen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Gβγ Binds to the Extreme C Terminus of SNAP25 to Mediate the Action of Gi/o-Coupled G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Zack Zurawski; Shelagh Rodriguez; Karren Hyde; Simon Alford; Heidi E Hamm
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 4.  How does the stimulus define exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells?

Authors:  Fernando D Marengo; Ana M Cárdenas
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Symptomatic treatment of botulism with a clinically approved small molecule.

Authors:  Edwin Vazquez-Cintron; James Machamer; Celinia Ondeck; Kathleen Pagarigan; Brittany Winner; Paige Bodner; Kyle Kelly; M Ross Pennington; Patrick McNutt
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-01-30

6.  Disabling the Gβγ-SNARE interaction disrupts GPCR-mediated presynaptic inhibition, leading to physiological and behavioral phenotypes.

Authors:  Zack Zurawski; Analisa D Thompson Gray; Lillian J Brady; Brian Page; Emily Church; Nicholas A Harris; Michael R Dohn; Yun Young Yim; Karren Hyde; Douglas P Mortlock; Carrie K Jones; Danny G Winder; Simon Alford; Heidi E Hamm
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 7.  The fusion pore, 60 years after the first cartoon.

Authors:  Satyan Sharma; Manfred Lindau
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Synaptic Integration of Subquantal Neurotransmission by Colocalized G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Presynaptic Terminals.

Authors:  Emily Church; Edaeni Hamid; Zack Zurawski; Mariana Potcoava; Eden Flores-Barrera; Adriana Caballero; Kuei Y Tseng; Simon Alford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 9.  Membrane Fusion Involved in Neurotransmission: Glimpse from Electron Microscope and Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Zhiwei Yang; Lu Gou; Shuyu Chen; Na Li; Shengli Zhang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.