S Shams1, J Martola2, L Cavallin2, T Granberg2, M Shams2, P Aspelin2, L O Wahlund3, M Kristoffersen-Wiberg2. 1. From the Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Division of Medical Imaging and Technology (S.S., J.M., L.C., T.G., M.S., P.A., M.K.-W.) Department of Radiology (S.S., J.M., L.C., T.G., M.S., P.A., M.K.-W.) sara.shams@ki.se. 2. From the Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Division of Medical Imaging and Technology (S.S., J.M., L.C., T.G., M.S., P.A., M.K.-W.) Department of Radiology (S.S., J.M., L.C., T.G., M.S., P.A., M.K.-W.). 3. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society (L.O.W.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Division of Clinical Geriatrics (L.O.W.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral microbleeds are thought to have potentially important clinical implications in dementia and stroke. However, the use of both T2* and SWI MR imaging sequences for microbleed detection has complicated the cross-comparison of study results. We aimed to determine the impact of microbleed sequences on microbleed detection and associated clinical parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from our memory clinic (n = 246; 53% female; mean age, 62) prospectively underwent 3T MR imaging, with conventional thick-section T2*, thick-section SWI, and conventional thin-section SWI. Microbleeds were assessed separately on thick-section SWI, thin-section SWI, and T2* by 3 raters, with varying neuroradiologic experience. Clinical and radiologic parameters from the dementia investigation were analyzed in association with the number of microbleeds in negative binomial regression analyses. RESULTS: Prevalence and number of microbleeds were higher on thick-/thin-section SWI (20/21%) compared with T2*(17%). There was no difference in microbleed prevalence/number between thick- and thin-section SWI. Interrater agreement was excellent for all raters and sequences. Univariate comparisons of clinical parameters between patients with and without microbleeds yielded no difference across sequences. In the regression analysis, only minor differences in clinical associations with the number of microbleeds were noted across sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the increased detection of microbleeds, we recommend SWI as the sequence of choice in microbleed detection. Microbleeds and their association with clinical parameters are robust to the effects of varying MR imaging sequences, suggesting that comparison of results across studies is possible, despite differing microbleed sequences.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral microbleeds are thought to have potentially important clinical implications in dementia and stroke. However, the use of both T2* and SWI MR imaging sequences for microbleed detection has complicated the cross-comparison of study results. We aimed to determine the impact of microbleed sequences on microbleed detection and associated clinical parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients from our memory clinic (n = 246; 53% female; mean age, 62) prospectively underwent 3T MR imaging, with conventional thick-section T2*, thick-section SWI, and conventional thin-section SWI. Microbleeds were assessed separately on thick-section SWI, thin-section SWI, and T2* by 3 raters, with varying neuroradiologic experience. Clinical and radiologic parameters from the dementia investigation were analyzed in association with the number of microbleeds in negative binomial regression analyses. RESULTS: Prevalence and number of microbleeds were higher on thick-/thin-section SWI (20/21%) compared with T2*(17%). There was no difference in microbleed prevalence/number between thick- and thin-section SWI. Interrater agreement was excellent for all raters and sequences. Univariate comparisons of clinical parameters between patients with and without microbleeds yielded no difference across sequences. In the regression analysis, only minor differences in clinical associations with the number of microbleeds were noted across sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the increased detection of microbleeds, we recommend SWI as the sequence of choice in microbleed detection. Microbleeds and their association with clinical parameters are robust to the effects of varying MR imaging sequences, suggesting that comparison of results across studies is possible, despite differing microbleed sequences.
Authors: Ah-Ling Cheng; Saima Batool; Cheryl R McCreary; M L Lauzon; Richard Frayne; Mayank Goyal; Eric E Smith Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: F Fazekas; R Kleinert; H Offenbacher; F Payer; R Schmidt; G Kleinert; H Radner; H Lechner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1991 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: I Skoog; B Lernfelt; S Landahl; B Palmertz; L A Andreasson; L Nilsson; G Persson; A Odén; A Svanborg Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-04-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: S Shams; J Martola; T Granberg; X Li; M Shams; S M Fereshtehnejad; L Cavallin; P Aspelin; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg; L O Wahlund Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Matthew Schrag; Grant McAuley; Justine Pomakian; Arshad Jiffry; Spencer Tung; Claudius Mueller; Harry V Vinters; E Mark Haacke; Barbara Holshouser; Daniel Kido; Wolff M Kirsch Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Steven M Greenberg; Meike W Vernooij; Charlotte Cordonnier; Anand Viswanathan; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Steven Warach; Lenore J Launer; Mark A Van Buchem; Monique Mb Breteler Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Sara Shams; Tobias Granberg; Juha Martola; Andreas Charidimou; Xiaozhen Li; Mana Shams; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Lena Cavallin; Peter Aspelin; Maria Wiberg-Kristoffersen; Lars-Olof Wahlund Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Christian Herweh; Klaus Hess; Uta Meyding-Lamadé; Andreas J Bartsch; Christoph Stippich; Joachim Jost; Birgit Friedmann-Bette; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Gianvincenzo Sparacia; Francesco Agnello; Giuseppe La Tona; Alberto Iaia; Federico Midiri; Benedetta Sparacia Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2017-05-02
Authors: I Barnaure; M-L Montandon; C Rodriguez; F Herrmann; K O Lövblad; P Giannakopoulos; S Haller Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.825