Literature DB >> 25698469

Contextual reminders fail to trigger memory reconsolidation in aged rats and aged humans.

Bethany J Jones1, Stacey M Pest1, Iliana M Vargas2, Elizabeth L Glisky3, Jean-Marc Fellous4.   

Abstract

There is strong evidence that hippocampal memory returns to a labile state upon reactivation, initiating a reconsolidation process that restabilizes it and allows for its updating. Normal aging is associated with deficits in episodic memory processes. However, the effects of aging on memory reconsolidation and its neural substrate remain largely unknown, and an animal model is lacking. In this study we investigated the effects of aging on context-dependent reconsolidation using an episodic set-learning task in humans and an analogous set-learning spatial task in rats. In both tasks, young and older subjects learned a set of objects (humans) or feeder locations (rats; Set 1) in Context A on Day 1. On Day 2, a different set (Set 2) was learned in either Context A (Reminder condition) or Context B (No Reminder condition). On Day 3, subjects were instructed (humans) or cued (rats) to recall Set 1. Young rats and humans in the Reminder condition falsely recalled significantly more items from Set 2 than those in the No Reminder condition, suggesting that the reminder context triggered a reactivation of Set 1 on Day 2 and allowed the integration of Set 2 items into Set 1. In both species, older subjects displayed a different pattern of results than young subjects. In aged rats, there was no difference between conditions in the level of falsely recalled Set 2 items (intrusions). Older humans in the No Reminder condition made significantly more intrusions than those in the Reminder condition. Follow-up control experiments in aged rats suggested that intrusions in older animals reflected general interference, independent of context manipulations. We conclude that contextual reminders are not sufficient to trigger memory updating in aged rats or aged humans, unlike in younger individuals. Future studies using this animal model should further our understanding of the role of the hippocampus in memory maintenance and updating during normal aging.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Memory; Reconsolidation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698469     DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  8 in total

Review 1.  Modulating reconsolidation: a link to causal systems-level dynamics of human memories.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen; Nitzan Censor
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  PSD-95 in CA1 Area Regulates Spatial Choice Depending on Age.

Authors:  Anna Cały; Małgorzata A Śliwińska; Magdalena Ziółkowska; Kacper Łukasiewicz; Roberto Pagano; Jakub M Dzik; Katarzyna Kalita; Tytus Bernaś; Michael G Stewart; K Peter Giese; Kasia Radwanska
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Understanding the boundary conditions of memory reconsolidation.

Authors:  Matthew P Walker; Robert Stickgold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Circuit mechanisms of hippocampal reactivation during sleep.

Authors:  Paola Malerba; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Dorsoventral and Proximodistal Hippocampal Processing Account for the Influences of Sleep and Context on Memory (Re)consolidation: A Connectionist Model.

Authors:  Justin Lines; Kelsey Nation; Jean-Marc Fellous
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03

6.  Intrusions in episodic memory: reconsolidation or interference?

Authors:  Angela Klingmüller; Jeremy B Caplan; Tobias Sommer
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Behavioral reconsolidation interference with episodic memory within-subjects is elusive.

Authors:  Daniel A Levy; Rotem Mika; Cecilia Radzyminski; Shir Ben-Zvi; Roni Tibon
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Multi-input Synapses, but Not LTP-Strengthened Synapses, Correlate with Hippocampal Memory Storage in Aged Mice.

Authors:  Wajeeha Aziz; Igor Kraev; Keiko Mizuno; Alastair Kirby; Ton Fang; Huzefa Rupawala; Kamillia Kasbi; Stephanie Rothe; Felix Jozsa; Kobi Rosenblum; Michael G Stewart; K Peter Giese
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 10.834

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.