Literature DB >> 25697991

Duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in different acoustic environments.

Arianna Astolfi1, Alessio Carullo2, Lorenzo Pavese1, Giuseppina Emma Puglisi1.   

Abstract

This work deals with the duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in rooms with very different reverberation times (RTs). Measurements were conducted using the Ambulatory Phonation Monitoring (APM) 3200 (Kaypentax, Montvale, NJ) and Voice-Care devices (developed at the Politecnico di Torino, Italy), both of which have a contact microphone placed on the base of the neck to detect skin vibrations during phonation. Six university professors and 22 university students made short laboratory monologs in which they explained something that they knew well to a listener 6 m away. Seven students also described a map with the intention of correctly explaining directions to a listener who drew the path on a blank chart. Longer speech samples were made by 25 primary school teachers in classrooms. A tendency to increase the voicing periods as the RT increased was on average observed for the university professors, the school teachers, and the university students who described a map. These students also showed longer silence periods than the students who made short monologs. The recognized trends concerned voice professionals or subjects who were highly motivated to make themselves understood in a perturbed speaking situation. Nonparametric statistical tests, which were applied to detect the differences in distributions of voicing and silence periods, have basically supported the findings.

Year:  2015        PMID: 25697991     DOI: 10.1121/1.4906259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Teachers' voicing and silence periods during continuous speech in classrooms with different reverberation times.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Arianna Astolfi; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Differences in Weeklong Ambulatory Vocal Behavior Between Female Patients With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Controls.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech Adjustments for Room Acoustics and Their Effects on Vocal Effort.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Effects of Face Masks on Physiological Parameters and Voice Production during Cycling Activity.

Authors:  Arianna Astolfi; Giuseppina Emma Puglisi; Louena Shtrepi; Paolo Tronville; Jesús Alejandro Marval Diaz; Alessio Carullo; Alberto Vallan; Alessio Atzori; Ada Ferri; Francesca Dotti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Influence of Classroom Acoustics on Noise Disturbance and Well-Being for First Graders.

Authors:  Arianna Astolfi; Giuseppina Emma Puglisi; Silvia Murgia; Greta Minelli; Franco Pellerey; Andrea Prato; Tiziana Sacco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.