Literature DB >> 25697463

Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance accurately tracks direction of adiposity change in overweight and obese 7- to 13-year-old children.

Popi Kasvis1, Tamara R Cohen1, Sarah-Ève Loiselle1, Nicolas Kim1, Tom J Hazell2, Catherine A Vanstone1, Celia Rodd3, Hugues Plourde1, Hope A Weiler4.   

Abstract

Body composition measurements are valuable when evaluating pediatric obesity interventions. We hypothesized that foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will accurately track the direction of adiposity change, but not magnitude, in part due to differences in fat patterning. The purposes of this study were to examine the accuracy of body composition measurements of overweight and obese children over time using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and BIA and to determine if BIA accuracy was affected by fat patterning. Eighty-nine overweight or obese children (48 girls, 41 boys, age 7-13 years) participating in a randomized controlled trial providing a family-centered, lifestyle intervention, underwent DXA and BIA measurements every 3 months. Bland-Altman plots showed a poor level of agreement between devices for baseline percent body fat (%BF; mean, 0.398%; +2SD, 8.685%; -2SD, -7.889%). There was overall agreement between DXA and BIA in the direction of change over time for %BF (difference between visits 3 and 1: DXA -0.8 ± 0.5%, BIA -0.7 ± 0.5%; P = 1.000) and fat mass (FM; difference between visits 3 and 1: DXA 0.7 ± 0.5 kg, BIA 0.6 ± 0.5 kg; P = 1.000). Bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements of %BF and FM at baseline were significantly different in those with android and gynoid fat (%BF: 35.9% ± 1.4%, 32.2% ± 1.4%, P < .003; FM: 20.1 ± 0.8 kg, 18.4 ± 0.8, P < .013). Bioelectrical impedance analysis accurately reports the direction of change in FM and FFM in overweight and obese children; inaccuracy in the magnitude of BIA measurements may be a result of fat patterning differences.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absorptiometry; Adipose tissue; Body composition; Electric impedance; Pediatric obesity; Photon; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25697463     DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res        ISSN: 0271-5317            Impact factor:   3.315


  3 in total

1.  Handgrip strength cutoff for cardiometabolic risk index among Colombian children and adolescents: The FUPRECOL Study.

Authors:  Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Jhonatan Camilo Peña-Ibagon; Javier Martínez-Torres; Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders; Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista; Felipe Lobelo; Antonio García-Hermoso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Body fat assessment in youth with overweight or obesity by an automated bioelectrical impedance analysis device, in comparison with the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hanen Samouda; Jérémie Langlet
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN CHILDREN WITH CANCER: COMPARISON OF DEUTERIUM OXIDE DILUTION WITH BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS AND ANTHROPOMETRY.

Authors:  Estela Beatriz Behling; José Simon Camelo Júnior; Eduardo Ferriolli; Karina Pfrimer; Jacqueline Pontes Monteiro
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.