Literature DB >> 25695547

Clinicopathologic analysis with immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair protein expression in synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Yusuke Kobayashi1, Kanako Nakamura, Hiroyuki Nomura, Kouji Banno, Haruko Irie, Masataka Adachi, Miho Iida, Kiyoko Umene, Yuya Nogami, Kenta Masuda, Iori Kisu, Arisa Ueki, Wataru Yamagami, Fumio Kataoka, Akira Hirasawa, Eiichiro Tominaga, Nobuyuki Susumu, Daisuke Aoki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers have been an important topic in clinical medicine because it is sometimes difficult to distinguish whether there are 2 primary tumors or a single primary tumor and an associated metastasis. In addition, although these tumors are recommended for either immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins or a microsatellite instability test in the Bethesda guidelines as Lynch syndrome-associated cancers, few studies have completed these analyses. In this study, we characterized the clinicopathologic features and the expression pattern of MMR proteins in synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers.
METHODS: Clinicopathologic features and the expression pattern of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6) were characterized and analyzed in 32 synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers.
RESULTS: Most synchronous cancers are endometrioid type (endometrioid/endometrioid) (n = 24, 75%), grade 1 (n = 19, 59.4%), and diagnosed as stage I (n = 15, 46.9%) in both endometrium and ovary. It is worth mentioning that 75% of the patients (n = 24) had endometriosis, which was more common (n = 21, 87.5%) in endometrioid/endometrioid cancers, whereas only 3 cases (37.5%) were of different histology (P = 0.018). Loss of expression of at least 1 MMR protein was observed in 17 (53.1%) of the endometrial tumors and in 10 (31.3%) of ovarian tumors. Only 4 cases (12.5%) that had specific MMR protein loss showed the same type of loss for both endometrial and ovarian tumors, in which 3 of the cases were losses in MLH1. One case showed concordant MSH6 protein loss, although the cases did not meet the Amsterdam criteria II.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that most synchronous primary endometrial ovarian cancers are not hereditary cancers caused by germ line mutations but rather sporadic cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25695547     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  10 in total

1.  Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinoma: A Case Series.

Authors:  Georgios-Marios Makris; Georgia Manousopoulou; Marco-Johannes Battista; Ioannis Salloum; Georgios Chrelias; Charalampos Chrelias
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09

2.  Screening for Lynch syndrome using risk assessment criteria in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Takeda; Kosuke Tsuji; Kouji Banno; Megumi Yanokura; Yusuke Kobayashi; Eiichiro Tominaga; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: The Origin and Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Kosuke Murakami; Yasushi Kotani; Hidekatsu Nakai; Noriomi Matsumura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome with a MSH2 germline mutation: A case report.

Authors:  Takashi Takeda; Kouji Banno; Megumi Yanokura; Mayuka Anko; Arata Kobayashi; Asako Sera; Takayuki Takahashi; Masataka Adachi; Yusuke Kobayashi; Shigenori Hayashi; Hiroyuki Nomura; Akira Hirasawa; Eiichiro Tominaga; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 5.  The Role of Immunohistochemistry Markers in Endometrial Cancer with Mismatch Repair Deficiency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amelia Favier; Justine Varinot; Catherine Uzan; Alex Duval; Isabelle Brocheriou; Geoffroy Canlorbe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Predictive and Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Gynecologic Cancer (Endometrial and Ovarian).

Authors:  Camille Evrard; Jérôme Alexandre
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Comparison of clinicopathologic variables in coexistence cancers of the endometrium and ovary: A review of 55 cases in an academic center in Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Sadidi; Narges Izadi-Mood; Soheila Sarmadi; Fariba Yarandi; Soheila Amini-Moghaddam; Fatemeh Esfahani; Mohammad Sadidi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Methylation Analysis of DNA Mismatch Repair Genes Using DNA Derived from the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: Epimutation in Endometrial Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Takashi Takeda; Kouji Banno; Megumi Yanokura; Masataka Adachi; Moito Iijima; Haruko Kunitomi; Kanako Nakamura; Miho Iida; Yuya Nogami; Kiyoko Umene; Kenta Masuda; Yusuke Kobayashi; Wataru Yamagami; Akira Hirasawa; Eiichiro Tominaga; Nobuyuki Susumu; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  Potential for Mitochondrial DNA Sequencing in the Differential Diagnosis of Gynaecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Anna Myriam Perrone; Giulia Girolimetti; Martina Procaccini; Lorena Marchio; Alessandra Livi; Giulia Borghese; Anna Maria Porcelli; Pierandrea De Iaco; Giuseppe Gasparre
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Comparison and analysis of the clinicopathological features of SCEO and ECOM.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Xiaodan Zhang; Zhiying Lu; Junyan Wang; Keqin Hua
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.234

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.