| Literature DB >> 25695098 |
Siddharudha Shivalli1, J P Majra2, K M Akshaya1, Ghulam Jeelani Qadiri3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: "Health for All" still eludes public health experts despite many approaches to prevent disease and promote health among urban poor. Several key illness factors lie beyond the conventional healthcare boundaries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25695098 PMCID: PMC4322852 DOI: 10.1155/2015/419192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Bird's view of the study area Bengre in Mangalore City, India [14].
Figure 2An outline of family centered approach adopted in this study.
Key sociodemographic characteristics of the study population.
| Characteristic |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Total population | 5,368 | 100 |
| Total households | 809 | 100 |
| Religion | ||
| Muslim | 779 | 96.3 |
| Hindu | 26 | 3.2 |
| Christian | 4 | 0.5 |
| Type of family | ||
| Nuclear | 518 | 64 |
| Joint/extended | 291 | 36 |
| Number of reproductive age group women | 1539 | 28.7 |
| Number of eligible couples | 1409 | 26.2 |
| Under five children | ||
| Male | 295 | 5.4 |
| Female | 253 | 4.6 |
| Source of health services for the family | ||
| Public sector | 186 | 23 |
| Private/others | 623 | 77 |
Family planning (FP) status among eligible couples in the area before the implementation of family centered approach (n = 1409).
| Study variable | Mean/ | SD/% |
|---|---|---|
| Mean age of marriage for women | 18.6 | 1.2 |
| Mean age of marriage for men | 24.14 | 2.8 |
| Mean age at 1st child for women | 19.9 | 1.6 |
| Mean age at 1st child for men | 25.3 | 2.1 |
| Average number of children | 2.7 | 1.1 |
| Spontaneous abortions | 61 | 4.3% |
| MTPs* | 78 | 5.5% |
| Knowledge of FP | 302 | 21.4% |
| Ever practiced FP | 178 | 12.6% |
*Medical termination of pregnancy.
Status of child health interventions in the study area before the implementation of family centered approach (n = 548).
| Study variable |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Birth registered | 527 | 96.1 |
| Mother received essential obstetric care | 543 | 99.1 |
| Mother received postnatal care | 542 | 98.9 |
| Delivery in a healthcare setup | 528 | 96.3 |
| Delivery by LSCS* | 64 | 11.7 |
| Low birth weight babies | 73 | 13.3 |
| Fully immunized children | 499 | 91.1 |
| Exclusively breast fed for 6 months | 513 | 93.6 |
| Vitamin A prophylaxis# | 219 | 40.0 |
*Lower segment caesarean section. #Children aged >9 months.
Figure 3Average monthly outpatient turnout in the study area (Jun. 2011–Nov. 2013) (family centered approach was initiated in Jan. 2012).
Key study variables before and after the implementation of family centered approach (FCA) in the study area.
| Study variable | Pre-FCA | Post-FCA# |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of houses using bed net ( | 21.2 | 62 | 34.26 | <0.001 |
| Proportion of houses with wire meshed windows ( | 19.8 | 58 | 30.67 | <0.001 |
| Incidence of malaria (per 1000 population) | 150 | 90 | 17.045 | <0.001 |
| Proportion of eligible couples who ever practiced any method of family planning ( | 12.6 | 32 | 8.635 | 0.003 |
| Proportion of pregnant and lactating women who ate one extra meal ( | 52 | 71 | 7.623 | 0.006 |
| Proportion of under five children with ADD in the last fifteen days ( | 43 | 29.2 | 4.128 | 0.04 |
FCA: family centered approach.
#Post-FCA assessment was done on 106 families/households selected by systematic random sampling.